{"title":"新政府,新机会,以及获得精神卫生保健的老问题","authors":"D. Gratzer, D. Goldbloom","doi":"10.1177/0706743716669084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For those concerned about access to mental health services, the present moment in politics holds promise. A federal Liberal government has been elected promising to address mental health access issues, a commitment recently reaffirmed by the Minister of Health. In Ottawa, bettering mental health care is nonpartisan: in the last election, every major political party promised action on improving services (unprecedented in federal campaigns); in the last Parliament, all parties supported a national suicide strategy. Good news is frankly welcome news. The interest is there and the need is great: 1 in 5 Canadians experiences a mental health problem in any given year, and they face a patchwork of care; many Ontarians have their first contact with the mental health system through the emergency room (roughly 1 in 3 with an anxiety disorder), according to a newly released Health Quality Ontario–Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (HQO-ICES) report. Access is problematic—especially if the bar is raised to the standard of access to evidence-based care. Consider recent articles published in this journal:","PeriodicalId":309115,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Government, New Opportunity, and an Old Problem with Access to Mental Health Care\",\"authors\":\"D. Gratzer, D. Goldbloom\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0706743716669084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For those concerned about access to mental health services, the present moment in politics holds promise. A federal Liberal government has been elected promising to address mental health access issues, a commitment recently reaffirmed by the Minister of Health. In Ottawa, bettering mental health care is nonpartisan: in the last election, every major political party promised action on improving services (unprecedented in federal campaigns); in the last Parliament, all parties supported a national suicide strategy. Good news is frankly welcome news. The interest is there and the need is great: 1 in 5 Canadians experiences a mental health problem in any given year, and they face a patchwork of care; many Ontarians have their first contact with the mental health system through the emergency room (roughly 1 in 3 with an anxiety disorder), according to a newly released Health Quality Ontario–Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (HQO-ICES) report. Access is problematic—especially if the bar is raised to the standard of access to evidence-based care. Consider recent articles published in this journal:\",\"PeriodicalId\":309115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743716669084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743716669084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
New Government, New Opportunity, and an Old Problem with Access to Mental Health Care
For those concerned about access to mental health services, the present moment in politics holds promise. A federal Liberal government has been elected promising to address mental health access issues, a commitment recently reaffirmed by the Minister of Health. In Ottawa, bettering mental health care is nonpartisan: in the last election, every major political party promised action on improving services (unprecedented in federal campaigns); in the last Parliament, all parties supported a national suicide strategy. Good news is frankly welcome news. The interest is there and the need is great: 1 in 5 Canadians experiences a mental health problem in any given year, and they face a patchwork of care; many Ontarians have their first contact with the mental health system through the emergency room (roughly 1 in 3 with an anxiety disorder), according to a newly released Health Quality Ontario–Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (HQO-ICES) report. Access is problematic—especially if the bar is raised to the standard of access to evidence-based care. Consider recent articles published in this journal: