面向团队的顶点设计课程管理:团队形成与评估的新途径

J. Emanuel, K. Worthington
{"title":"面向团队的顶点设计课程管理:团队形成与评估的新途径","authors":"J. Emanuel, K. Worthington","doi":"10.1109/FIE.1989.69408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors report on a scheme for evaluating students involved in team-oriented capstone engineering design projects. This scheme, implemented in Bradley's Industrial Engineering Department, addresses the problems associated with forming teams, potential interpersonal conflicts within the team, and the difficulty in assigning grades to individuals when the project is a team project. Under the scheme the categories, point values, and weights will vary for different programs. This method of evaluation give the faculty a more objective (and more defensible) approach to team project grading. The faculty involved in each program will have to decide on modifications to this scheme depending on their own requirements.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":319513,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1989 Frontiers in Education Conference","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Team oriented capstone design course management: a new approach to team formulation and evaluation\",\"authors\":\"J. Emanuel, K. Worthington\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/FIE.1989.69408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors report on a scheme for evaluating students involved in team-oriented capstone engineering design projects. This scheme, implemented in Bradley's Industrial Engineering Department, addresses the problems associated with forming teams, potential interpersonal conflicts within the team, and the difficulty in assigning grades to individuals when the project is a team project. Under the scheme the categories, point values, and weights will vary for different programs. This method of evaluation give the faculty a more objective (and more defensible) approach to team project grading. The faculty involved in each program will have to decide on modifications to this scheme depending on their own requirements.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":319513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 1989 Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 1989 Frontiers in Education Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1989.69408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1989 Frontiers in Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.1989.69408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

作者报告了一种评估学生参与团队导向的顶点工程设计项目的方案。这个方案在布拉德利的工业工程部门实施,解决了与组建团队有关的问题,团队内部潜在的人际冲突,以及当项目是一个团队项目时给个人打分的困难。在该方案下,不同项目的分类、积分值和权重会有所不同。这种评估方法为教师提供了一个更客观(也更站得住脚)的方法来给团队项目评分。参与每个项目的教师将不得不根据自己的需求决定对该方案的修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Team oriented capstone design course management: a new approach to team formulation and evaluation
The authors report on a scheme for evaluating students involved in team-oriented capstone engineering design projects. This scheme, implemented in Bradley's Industrial Engineering Department, addresses the problems associated with forming teams, potential interpersonal conflicts within the team, and the difficulty in assigning grades to individuals when the project is a team project. Under the scheme the categories, point values, and weights will vary for different programs. This method of evaluation give the faculty a more objective (and more defensible) approach to team project grading. The faculty involved in each program will have to decide on modifications to this scheme depending on their own requirements.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A graphical animation authoring system for in-class demonstration of circuit operation Experiences with the New Jersey Master Faculty Program Teaching circuit analysis with MICRO-CAP II On the implementation of a nationwide expertise educational network Cooperation not competition (engineering education)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1