Farhan P. Putra, Prima Dewi Purnamasari, A. A. P. Ratna, Lea Santiar
{"title":"日语考试作文自动评分系统中MLP-BPNN与MLP-PSO的比较","authors":"Farhan P. Putra, Prima Dewi Purnamasari, A. A. P. Ratna, Lea Santiar","doi":"10.1109/QIR54354.2021.9716163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a study was conducted for a hybrid model for Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) with Particle Swarm optimization (PSO). The PSO was used to replace the Backpropagation method for the weight optimization. The comparison was conducted between MLP-BPNN and MLPPSO for an automated essay grading system for Japanese language exam. The MLP-PSO model achieved a more accurate but less stable result. The MLP-PSO model with 10 particles trained for 15 steps achieves the best result out of the two MLP-PSO models tested, with an average 8.48% error for the grade population. Compared to the MLP-PSO model, it was discovered that MLP-BPNN with Adam optimizer achieves better overall performance and results concerning both the accuracy and the stability of the model.","PeriodicalId":446396,"journal":{"name":"2021 17th International Conference on Quality in Research (QIR): International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of MLP-BPNN and MLP-PSO for Automatic Essay Grading System for Japanese Language Exam\",\"authors\":\"Farhan P. Putra, Prima Dewi Purnamasari, A. A. P. Ratna, Lea Santiar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/QIR54354.2021.9716163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a study was conducted for a hybrid model for Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) with Particle Swarm optimization (PSO). The PSO was used to replace the Backpropagation method for the weight optimization. The comparison was conducted between MLP-BPNN and MLPPSO for an automated essay grading system for Japanese language exam. The MLP-PSO model achieved a more accurate but less stable result. The MLP-PSO model with 10 particles trained for 15 steps achieves the best result out of the two MLP-PSO models tested, with an average 8.48% error for the grade population. Compared to the MLP-PSO model, it was discovered that MLP-BPNN with Adam optimizer achieves better overall performance and results concerning both the accuracy and the stability of the model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 17th International Conference on Quality in Research (QIR): International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 17th International Conference on Quality in Research (QIR): International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/QIR54354.2021.9716163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 17th International Conference on Quality in Research (QIR): International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QIR54354.2021.9716163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of MLP-BPNN and MLP-PSO for Automatic Essay Grading System for Japanese Language Exam
In this paper, a study was conducted for a hybrid model for Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) with Particle Swarm optimization (PSO). The PSO was used to replace the Backpropagation method for the weight optimization. The comparison was conducted between MLP-BPNN and MLPPSO for an automated essay grading system for Japanese language exam. The MLP-PSO model achieved a more accurate but less stable result. The MLP-PSO model with 10 particles trained for 15 steps achieves the best result out of the two MLP-PSO models tested, with an average 8.48% error for the grade population. Compared to the MLP-PSO model, it was discovered that MLP-BPNN with Adam optimizer achieves better overall performance and results concerning both the accuracy and the stability of the model.