反跨性别女权主义中的反女权主义

Alyosxa Tudor
{"title":"反跨性别女权主义中的反女权主义","authors":"Alyosxa Tudor","doi":"10.1177/13505068231164217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 4 February 2023, the Centre for Gender Studies as SOAS University of London in the United Kingdom spontaneously hosted a conference titled We are the feminisms in the lecture theatres (and in the streets). The event was put together within 10 days and speakers from London-based SOAS, University College London (UCL), London School of Economics and Cardiff University, Glasgow School of Arts as well as independent scholars promptly agreed to share their work and – as the subtitle to the conference promised – their understanding of feminisms as ‘intersectional, transnational and interconnected with fighting racism and hate against lesbians, trans + queer people’1 (CGS, 2023). The conference took place on the same day as another event, across the road from SOAS, at the UCL-based IOE. Under the title Education for women’s liberation,2 this conference hosted an arsenal of academic and activist speakers known for their essentialist views on women and sex, their discriminatory views and politics towards trans people and trans women in particular and for their various documented overlaps with conservative and far-right agendas.3 In this article,4 I want to take the SOAS event as a ground for pondering: How can we continue to imagine the political potentials of transfeminisms while also attending to a current political moment in which globally critical scholarship and activism on gender, sexuality, race and migration is under attack? These attacks come from a variety of actors, ranging from the far right including both the conservative mainstream and Christian fanatics to liberals or traditionally left-wing institutions like strands within socialist parties, trade unions and certain strands of feminism (Corrêa 2018). We are currently witnessing a supernational unification of far right, centrist and leftist agents using anti-gender, anti-feminist and transphobic mobilisations, populist affects and strategic disinformation as accelerators for hateful and anti-democratic agendas. Ultimately, this leads to a consolidation of the global shift to the right.","PeriodicalId":312959,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Women's Studies","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The anti-feminism of anti-trans feminism\",\"authors\":\"Alyosxa Tudor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13505068231164217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On 4 February 2023, the Centre for Gender Studies as SOAS University of London in the United Kingdom spontaneously hosted a conference titled We are the feminisms in the lecture theatres (and in the streets). The event was put together within 10 days and speakers from London-based SOAS, University College London (UCL), London School of Economics and Cardiff University, Glasgow School of Arts as well as independent scholars promptly agreed to share their work and – as the subtitle to the conference promised – their understanding of feminisms as ‘intersectional, transnational and interconnected with fighting racism and hate against lesbians, trans + queer people’1 (CGS, 2023). The conference took place on the same day as another event, across the road from SOAS, at the UCL-based IOE. Under the title Education for women’s liberation,2 this conference hosted an arsenal of academic and activist speakers known for their essentialist views on women and sex, their discriminatory views and politics towards trans people and trans women in particular and for their various documented overlaps with conservative and far-right agendas.3 In this article,4 I want to take the SOAS event as a ground for pondering: How can we continue to imagine the political potentials of transfeminisms while also attending to a current political moment in which globally critical scholarship and activism on gender, sexuality, race and migration is under attack? These attacks come from a variety of actors, ranging from the far right including both the conservative mainstream and Christian fanatics to liberals or traditionally left-wing institutions like strands within socialist parties, trade unions and certain strands of feminism (Corrêa 2018). We are currently witnessing a supernational unification of far right, centrist and leftist agents using anti-gender, anti-feminist and transphobic mobilisations, populist affects and strategic disinformation as accelerators for hateful and anti-democratic agendas. Ultimately, this leads to a consolidation of the global shift to the right.\",\"PeriodicalId\":312959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Women's Studies\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Women's Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068231164217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Women's Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068231164217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2023年2月4日,英国伦敦大学亚非学院(SOAS)性别研究中心自发举办了一场题为“我们是女权主义者”的会议,在演讲厅(和街头)举行。该活动在10天内组织起来,来自伦敦SOAS、伦敦大学学院(UCL)、伦敦经济学院、卡迪夫大学、格拉斯哥艺术学院的演讲者以及独立学者迅速同意分享他们的工作,正如会议的副标题所承诺的那样,他们对女权主义的理解是“交叉的、跨国的,与反对种族主义和对女同性恋、跨性别者和酷儿群体的仇恨相关联”1 (CGS, 2023)。会议与另一场活动在同一天举行,地点就在SOAS对面,位于伦敦大学学院的IOE。本次会议以“妇女解放教育”为主题,邀请了一大批学者和活动人士发言,他们以对女性和性的本质主义观点、对跨性别者(尤其是跨性别女性)的歧视性观点和政治观点,以及与保守派和极右翼议程的各种记录重叠而闻名在这篇文章中,我想把SOAS事件作为思考的基础:我们如何才能继续想象跨性别主义的政治潜力,同时也关注当前的政治时刻,在这个政治时刻,全球批判性的学术研究和关于性别、性、种族和移民的行动主义受到攻击?这些攻击来自各种各样的行动者,从包括保守派主流和基督教狂热分子在内的极右翼,到自由主义者或传统左翼机构,如社会主义政党、工会和某些女权主义派别(Corrêa 2018)。我们目前正在目睹极右翼、中间派和左翼代理人的跨国联合,他们利用反性别、反女权主义和反跨性别的动员、民粹主义影响和战略性虚假信息,作为仇恨和反民主议程的加速器。最终,这将导致全球向右转移的巩固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The anti-feminism of anti-trans feminism
On 4 February 2023, the Centre for Gender Studies as SOAS University of London in the United Kingdom spontaneously hosted a conference titled We are the feminisms in the lecture theatres (and in the streets). The event was put together within 10 days and speakers from London-based SOAS, University College London (UCL), London School of Economics and Cardiff University, Glasgow School of Arts as well as independent scholars promptly agreed to share their work and – as the subtitle to the conference promised – their understanding of feminisms as ‘intersectional, transnational and interconnected with fighting racism and hate against lesbians, trans + queer people’1 (CGS, 2023). The conference took place on the same day as another event, across the road from SOAS, at the UCL-based IOE. Under the title Education for women’s liberation,2 this conference hosted an arsenal of academic and activist speakers known for their essentialist views on women and sex, their discriminatory views and politics towards trans people and trans women in particular and for their various documented overlaps with conservative and far-right agendas.3 In this article,4 I want to take the SOAS event as a ground for pondering: How can we continue to imagine the political potentials of transfeminisms while also attending to a current political moment in which globally critical scholarship and activism on gender, sexuality, race and migration is under attack? These attacks come from a variety of actors, ranging from the far right including both the conservative mainstream and Christian fanatics to liberals or traditionally left-wing institutions like strands within socialist parties, trade unions and certain strands of feminism (Corrêa 2018). We are currently witnessing a supernational unification of far right, centrist and leftist agents using anti-gender, anti-feminist and transphobic mobilisations, populist affects and strategic disinformation as accelerators for hateful and anti-democratic agendas. Ultimately, this leads to a consolidation of the global shift to the right.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Touching through distance: Cyborg affective touch during Covid-19 pandemic Pandemic narra(c)tions. Collective audiovisual configurations and participatory self-care Domestic closed circuits (of violence) Unveiling urban landscapes: Alisa Oleva’s performances during the pandemic Young women, dating apps, and affective assemblages in the time of pandemic: No relationship is a linear transition to a fixed point
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1