集体诉诸司法

Michael Molavi
{"title":"集体诉诸司法","authors":"Michael Molavi","doi":"10.2307/J.CTV1GHV4H0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter begins by elaborating England and Wales's need for increasing access to justice. It notes the observance of justice stakeholders that the capacity of people to access justice is paramount in a democracy governed by the rule of law. It also discusses the Competition Appeal Tribunal, which was a legislation introduced in Parliament on 23 January 2014 and is considered the only area where class actions are available. The chapter explains the decision of England and Wales to introduce class actions on a sectoral basis, rather than using a generic or trans-substantive approach, which is in contrast to other regimes and well-established principles of civil procedure since the 1870s. It discusses claims that are covered in the Competition Appeal Tribunal which remain unfulfilled in every other area of law.","PeriodicalId":197774,"journal":{"name":"Collective Access to Justice","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collective Access to Justice\",\"authors\":\"Michael Molavi\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/J.CTV1GHV4H0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter begins by elaborating England and Wales's need for increasing access to justice. It notes the observance of justice stakeholders that the capacity of people to access justice is paramount in a democracy governed by the rule of law. It also discusses the Competition Appeal Tribunal, which was a legislation introduced in Parliament on 23 January 2014 and is considered the only area where class actions are available. The chapter explains the decision of England and Wales to introduce class actions on a sectoral basis, rather than using a generic or trans-substantive approach, which is in contrast to other regimes and well-established principles of civil procedure since the 1870s. It discusses claims that are covered in the Competition Appeal Tribunal which remain unfulfilled in every other area of law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collective Access to Justice\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collective Access to Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/J.CTV1GHV4H0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collective Access to Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/J.CTV1GHV4H0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章首先阐述英格兰和威尔士需要增加诉诸司法的机会。委员会注意到司法利益攸关方遵守的原则是,人民获得司法救助的能力在法治民主中至关重要。它还讨论了竞争上诉法庭,这是2014年1月23日在议会提出的一项立法,被认为是唯一可以进行集体诉讼的领域。本章解释了英格兰和威尔士在部门基础上引入集体诉讼的决定,而不是使用通用或跨实体的方法,这与自19世纪70年代以来的其他制度和完善的民事诉讼原则形成对比。它讨论了竞争上诉法庭所涵盖的索赔,这些索赔在其他法律领域都没有得到履行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collective Access to Justice
This chapter begins by elaborating England and Wales's need for increasing access to justice. It notes the observance of justice stakeholders that the capacity of people to access justice is paramount in a democracy governed by the rule of law. It also discusses the Competition Appeal Tribunal, which was a legislation introduced in Parliament on 23 January 2014 and is considered the only area where class actions are available. The chapter explains the decision of England and Wales to introduce class actions on a sectoral basis, rather than using a generic or trans-substantive approach, which is in contrast to other regimes and well-established principles of civil procedure since the 1870s. It discusses claims that are covered in the Competition Appeal Tribunal which remain unfulfilled in every other area of law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collective Access to Justice Uncovering the Politics of Class Actions Class Actions in Historical and Comparative Perspective Understanding the Economics of Class Actions Conclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1