基于鹿儿岛县数据的SNEAT信效度验证——关于SNEAT标准化的研究

Changwan Han, Aiko Kohara
{"title":"基于鹿儿岛县数据的SNEAT信效度验证——关于SNEAT标准化的研究","authors":"Changwan Han, Aiko Kohara","doi":"10.14391/AJHS.11.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Special Needs Education Assessment Tool (SNEAT) were verified of reliability and validity. However, the reliability and validity has been verified is only Okinawa and Miyagi Prefecture, the national data has not been analyzed. Therefore, this study aimed to verify the reliability and construct validity of SNEAT in Kagoshima Prefecture as part of the national survey. SNEAT using 32 children collected from the classes on Jiritsu-Katusdo (independent activity) for children with disabilities in Kagosima Prefecture between October and November 2015. Survey data were collected in a longitudinal prospective cohort study. The reliability of SNEAT was verified via the internal consistency method; the coefficient of Cronbach’s α were over 0.7. The validity of SNEAT was also verified via the latent growth curve model. SNEAT is valid based on its goodness-of-fit values obtained using the latent growth curve model. These results indicate that SNEAT has high reliability and construct validity in Kagoshima Prefecture.","PeriodicalId":370734,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of human services","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Verification of Reliability and Validity of the SNEAT Based on the Data from Kagoshima Prefecture:A Study on the Standardization of the SNEAT\",\"authors\":\"Changwan Han, Aiko Kohara\",\"doi\":\"10.14391/AJHS.11.124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Special Needs Education Assessment Tool (SNEAT) were verified of reliability and validity. However, the reliability and validity has been verified is only Okinawa and Miyagi Prefecture, the national data has not been analyzed. Therefore, this study aimed to verify the reliability and construct validity of SNEAT in Kagoshima Prefecture as part of the national survey. SNEAT using 32 children collected from the classes on Jiritsu-Katusdo (independent activity) for children with disabilities in Kagosima Prefecture between October and November 2015. Survey data were collected in a longitudinal prospective cohort study. The reliability of SNEAT was verified via the internal consistency method; the coefficient of Cronbach’s α were over 0.7. The validity of SNEAT was also verified via the latent growth curve model. SNEAT is valid based on its goodness-of-fit values obtained using the latent growth curve model. These results indicate that SNEAT has high reliability and construct validity in Kagoshima Prefecture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian journal of human services\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian journal of human services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14391/AJHS.11.124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of human services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14391/AJHS.11.124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

对特殊需要教育评估工具(SNEAT)的信度和效度进行了验证。然而,信度和效度得到验证的仅是冲绳县和宫城县,全国数据尚未进行分析。因此,本研究旨在验证鹿儿岛县SNEAT作为全国调查的一部分的信度和构建效度。SNEAT使用了2015年10月至11月期间从鹿儿岛县残疾儿童独立活动Jiritsu-Katusdo(独立活动)班收集的32名儿童。调查数据收集于一项纵向前瞻性队列研究。通过内一致性法验证了SNEAT的可靠性;Cronbach’s α系数均大于0.7。通过潜在生长曲线模型验证了SNEAT的有效性。SNEAT是有效的,其拟合优度是由潜在生长曲线模型得到的。结果表明,SNEAT在鹿儿岛县具有较高的信度和结构效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Verification of Reliability and Validity of the SNEAT Based on the Data from Kagoshima Prefecture:A Study on the Standardization of the SNEAT
The Special Needs Education Assessment Tool (SNEAT) were verified of reliability and validity. However, the reliability and validity has been verified is only Okinawa and Miyagi Prefecture, the national data has not been analyzed. Therefore, this study aimed to verify the reliability and construct validity of SNEAT in Kagoshima Prefecture as part of the national survey. SNEAT using 32 children collected from the classes on Jiritsu-Katusdo (independent activity) for children with disabilities in Kagosima Prefecture between October and November 2015. Survey data were collected in a longitudinal prospective cohort study. The reliability of SNEAT was verified via the internal consistency method; the coefficient of Cronbach’s α were over 0.7. The validity of SNEAT was also verified via the latent growth curve model. SNEAT is valid based on its goodness-of-fit values obtained using the latent growth curve model. These results indicate that SNEAT has high reliability and construct validity in Kagoshima Prefecture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Critical Discourse Analysis of Feminism in Katherine Mansfield's Bliss A Japan-Korea Comparative Study on Welfare Professional Training Association between Autistic Traits and Maladaptive Behaviors in Preschool Children Using the Child Development Support Center in Japan Explaining Peers with Autism Spectrum Disorder to Others and Coping with Others’ and Siblings’ Negative Attitudes A Study on Awareness of Young Peer Supporters in a Japanese Secondary School Through Thematic Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1