EM-Coffee: M-Coffee的改良版

Nguyen Ha Anh Tuan, Ha Tuan Cuong, N. H. Dũng, L. Vinh, Tu Minh Phuong
{"title":"EM-Coffee: M-Coffee的改良版","authors":"Nguyen Ha Anh Tuan, Ha Tuan Cuong, N. H. Dũng, L. Vinh, Tu Minh Phuong","doi":"10.1109/KSE.2010.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiple sequence alignment is a basic of sequence analysis. In the development of multiple sequence alignment (MSA) approaches, M-Coffee [1] was proposed as a meta-method for assembling outputs from different individual multiple aligners into one single MSA to boost the accuracy. Authors showed that M-Coffee outperformed individual alignment methods. In this paper, we propose an improvement of M-coffee, called EM-Coffee, by introducing a new weighting scheme for combining input alignments. Experiments with benchmark datasets showed that EM-Coffee produced better results than M-Coffee, T-Coffee, Muscle and some other widely used methods. Thus, we provide an alternative option for researchers to align sequences.","PeriodicalId":158823,"journal":{"name":"2010 Second International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EM-Coffee: An Improvement of M-Coffee\",\"authors\":\"Nguyen Ha Anh Tuan, Ha Tuan Cuong, N. H. Dũng, L. Vinh, Tu Minh Phuong\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/KSE.2010.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multiple sequence alignment is a basic of sequence analysis. In the development of multiple sequence alignment (MSA) approaches, M-Coffee [1] was proposed as a meta-method for assembling outputs from different individual multiple aligners into one single MSA to boost the accuracy. Authors showed that M-Coffee outperformed individual alignment methods. In this paper, we propose an improvement of M-coffee, called EM-Coffee, by introducing a new weighting scheme for combining input alignments. Experiments with benchmark datasets showed that EM-Coffee produced better results than M-Coffee, T-Coffee, Muscle and some other widely used methods. Thus, we provide an alternative option for researchers to align sequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 Second International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 Second International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/KSE.2010.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Second International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/KSE.2010.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多序列比对是序列分析的基础。在多序列比对(MSA)方法的发展中,M-Coffee[1]被提出作为一种元方法,将不同的多个序列比对器的输出集合到一个单一的MSA中,以提高精度。作者表明M-Coffee优于个体对齐方法。在本文中,我们提出了M-coffee的改进,称为EM-Coffee,通过引入一个新的加权方案来组合输入对齐。基于基准数据集的实验表明,EM-Coffee比M-Coffee、T-Coffee、Muscle和其他一些广泛使用的方法产生了更好的结果。因此,我们为研究人员提供了另一种选择来排列序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EM-Coffee: An Improvement of M-Coffee
Multiple sequence alignment is a basic of sequence analysis. In the development of multiple sequence alignment (MSA) approaches, M-Coffee [1] was proposed as a meta-method for assembling outputs from different individual multiple aligners into one single MSA to boost the accuracy. Authors showed that M-Coffee outperformed individual alignment methods. In this paper, we propose an improvement of M-coffee, called EM-Coffee, by introducing a new weighting scheme for combining input alignments. Experiments with benchmark datasets showed that EM-Coffee produced better results than M-Coffee, T-Coffee, Muscle and some other widely used methods. Thus, we provide an alternative option for researchers to align sequences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Effective Method for Ontology Integration by Propagating Inconsistency An Improvement of PIP for Time Series Dimensionality Reduction and Its Index Structure Smoothing Supervised Learning of Neural Networks for Function Approximation A Runtime Approach to Verify Scenario in Multi-agent Systems Supervised Feature Evaluation by Consistency Analysis: Application to Measure Sets Used to Characterise Geographic Objects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1