生产设计

Peg McClellan
{"title":"生产设计","authors":"Peg McClellan","doi":"10.5040/9781350096479.ch-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally, mathematics teachers have instructed by explaining algorithms, theorems, and sample problems to large groups of students who are presumably interested in the topic at hand. Lectures may be an efficient means of transmitting information and facts from one mind to another. However, lectures may not effectively create opportunities for students to make the mathematical thought their own or allow teachers to evaluate understanding. By comparison, collaborative group work requires students to verbalize their ideas, hear the ideas of their peers, and challenge one another. The main benefit from instituting group work, therefore, is that within that framework students have a chance to think for themselves and share their developing thoughts. This process could be as simple as a teacher posing a series of questions about the properties of polygons that students discuss in small groups and report on in a large group discussion. Alternatively, groups might be involved in a more elaborate investigation that guides students in setting key criteria for classifying plane shapes. In these exchanges, teachers can more easily assess student progress and identify individual strengths and weaknesses.","PeriodicalId":167128,"journal":{"name":"Trouble in Paradise","volume":"9 11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Production Design\",\"authors\":\"Peg McClellan\",\"doi\":\"10.5040/9781350096479.ch-005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditionally, mathematics teachers have instructed by explaining algorithms, theorems, and sample problems to large groups of students who are presumably interested in the topic at hand. Lectures may be an efficient means of transmitting information and facts from one mind to another. However, lectures may not effectively create opportunities for students to make the mathematical thought their own or allow teachers to evaluate understanding. By comparison, collaborative group work requires students to verbalize their ideas, hear the ideas of their peers, and challenge one another. The main benefit from instituting group work, therefore, is that within that framework students have a chance to think for themselves and share their developing thoughts. This process could be as simple as a teacher posing a series of questions about the properties of polygons that students discuss in small groups and report on in a large group discussion. Alternatively, groups might be involved in a more elaborate investigation that guides students in setting key criteria for classifying plane shapes. In these exchanges, teachers can more easily assess student progress and identify individual strengths and weaknesses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trouble in Paradise\",\"volume\":\"9 11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trouble in Paradise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350096479.ch-005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trouble in Paradise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350096479.ch-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

传统上,数学老师通过解释算法、定理和例题来指导学生,这些学生可能对手头的主题感兴趣。讲座可能是将信息和事实从一个人的头脑传递给另一个人的有效手段。然而,讲课可能不能有效地为学生创造机会,使他们自己的数学思想或让教师评估理解。相比之下,合作小组作业要求学生用语言表达他们的想法,听取同龄人的想法,并相互挑战。因此,建立小组作业的主要好处是,在这个框架内,学生有机会自己思考并分享他们正在发展的想法。这个过程可以很简单,就像老师提出一系列关于多边形属性的问题,学生在小组讨论中讨论,然后在大小组讨论中报告。或者,小组可以参与一个更详细的调查,指导学生设定分类平面形状的关键标准。在这些交流中,教师可以更容易地评估学生的进步,并确定个人的长处和短处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Production Design
Traditionally, mathematics teachers have instructed by explaining algorithms, theorems, and sample problems to large groups of students who are presumably interested in the topic at hand. Lectures may be an efficient means of transmitting information and facts from one mind to another. However, lectures may not effectively create opportunities for students to make the mathematical thought their own or allow teachers to evaluate understanding. By comparison, collaborative group work requires students to verbalize their ideas, hear the ideas of their peers, and challenge one another. The main benefit from instituting group work, therefore, is that within that framework students have a chance to think for themselves and share their developing thoughts. This process could be as simple as a teacher posing a series of questions about the properties of polygons that students discuss in small groups and report on in a large group discussion. Alternatively, groups might be involved in a more elaborate investigation that guides students in setting key criteria for classifying plane shapes. In these exchanges, teachers can more easily assess student progress and identify individual strengths and weaknesses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Production Design Conclusion: The Lubitsch Touch Credits Scenario Lubitsch’s Career
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1