为出版而写作:研究生研究写作的在线教学

N. Smirnova
{"title":"为出版而写作:研究生研究写作的在线教学","authors":"N. Smirnova","doi":"10.1163/9789004304338_005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Publish or perish” pressure is increasing and has been experienced by researchers all over the world, as well as by post/graduate students who are facing the challenge of writing their research papers in highly diverse, multinational and competitive academic environments. <br>Research studies on writing for publication are grounded in various theoretical frameworks, and focus on such issues as: the importance of English linguistic competence within local contexts (Casanave &amp; Hubbard, 1992), inequality in centre vs periphery scholars’ experiences in the process of knowledge production (Canagarajah, 1996; Curry &amp; Lillis, 2004, 2010; see the chapter by Habibie in this volume), discourse analysis of professional writing (Swales, 1981; 1990; 2004), the intelligibility of a researcher’s community (Flowerdew, 2001, 2008), as well as pedagogies of teaching writing for publication (e.g., Mezek, 2013). Successful approaches of teaching how to write for publication include using “moves” which have emerged from discourse analysis and corpus linguistics; writing guidelines for effective autonomous research writing and independent study; and English-medium text books on academic and scientific writing for classroom-based modes (e.g., “Academic writing for graduate students” by Swales and Feak, 2012). Although the research in the field of writing for publication has been conducted for more than 20 years, and a number of pedagogical models on teaching writing for publication have been developed (e.g., “Writing for scholarly publication”, n.d.; “Writing a scientific research article”, n.d.), the effectiveness of these models has not been established. <br>This chapter investigates whether effective online synchronous instruction on writing to publish (both at the linguistic and metalinguistic levels) combined with a developed self-regulated learning framework can facilitate the process of writing research at a post/graduate level. The main goal of the study is to develop pedagogy to improve post/graduate students’ research literacies (writing) in relation to their self-regulated learning. To this end, a unique online course was developed combining SRL and writing research in English. Two specific goals of the study are: <br>• to assess the effectiveness of a five-month online writing course for post/graduate students aimed at improving their research writing competencies (at the linguistic and meta-linguistic levels) and SRL competence; <br>• to examine if an online course aimed at teaching both writing research, within the framework of self-regulated learning would lead to higher SRL results and better writing for publication skills.","PeriodicalId":121269,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Postsecondary Education (Topic)","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing-for-Publication: Online Pedagogy for Post/Graduate Research Writing\",\"authors\":\"N. Smirnova\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004304338_005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“Publish or perish” pressure is increasing and has been experienced by researchers all over the world, as well as by post/graduate students who are facing the challenge of writing their research papers in highly diverse, multinational and competitive academic environments. <br>Research studies on writing for publication are grounded in various theoretical frameworks, and focus on such issues as: the importance of English linguistic competence within local contexts (Casanave &amp; Hubbard, 1992), inequality in centre vs periphery scholars’ experiences in the process of knowledge production (Canagarajah, 1996; Curry &amp; Lillis, 2004, 2010; see the chapter by Habibie in this volume), discourse analysis of professional writing (Swales, 1981; 1990; 2004), the intelligibility of a researcher’s community (Flowerdew, 2001, 2008), as well as pedagogies of teaching writing for publication (e.g., Mezek, 2013). Successful approaches of teaching how to write for publication include using “moves” which have emerged from discourse analysis and corpus linguistics; writing guidelines for effective autonomous research writing and independent study; and English-medium text books on academic and scientific writing for classroom-based modes (e.g., “Academic writing for graduate students” by Swales and Feak, 2012). Although the research in the field of writing for publication has been conducted for more than 20 years, and a number of pedagogical models on teaching writing for publication have been developed (e.g., “Writing for scholarly publication”, n.d.; “Writing a scientific research article”, n.d.), the effectiveness of these models has not been established. <br>This chapter investigates whether effective online synchronous instruction on writing to publish (both at the linguistic and metalinguistic levels) combined with a developed self-regulated learning framework can facilitate the process of writing research at a post/graduate level. The main goal of the study is to develop pedagogy to improve post/graduate students’ research literacies (writing) in relation to their self-regulated learning. To this end, a unique online course was developed combining SRL and writing research in English. Two specific goals of the study are: <br>• to assess the effectiveness of a five-month online writing course for post/graduate students aimed at improving their research writing competencies (at the linguistic and meta-linguistic levels) and SRL competence; <br>• to examine if an online course aimed at teaching both writing research, within the framework of self-regulated learning would lead to higher SRL results and better writing for publication skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EduRN: Postsecondary Education (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"139 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EduRN: Postsecondary Education (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004304338_005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Postsecondary Education (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004304338_005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

“发表或灭亡”的压力正在增加,世界各地的研究人员以及在高度多样化、跨国和竞争激烈的学术环境中面临撰写研究论文挑战的研究生都经历了这种压力。关于出版写作的研究以各种理论框架为基础,重点关注以下问题:英语语言能力在当地语境中的重要性(Casanave &Hubbard, 1992),中心与边缘学者在知识生产过程中的不平等(Canagarajah, 1996;咖喱,Lillis, 2004,2010;参见本卷哈比比的章节),专业写作的话语分析(斯韦尔斯,1981;1990;2004年),研究者群体的可理解性(Flowerdew, 2001年,2008年),以及出版写作教学的教学法(例如,Mezek, 2013年)。成功的教学方法包括使用话语分析和语料库语言学中出现的“动作”;有效自主研究写作和独立学习的写作指南;以及以课堂为基础的学术和科学写作的英语教材(例如,Swales和Feak, 2012年出版的《研究生学术写作》)。虽然出版写作领域的研究已经进行了20多年,并且已经形成了许多出版写作教学的教学模式(如“学术出版写作”,n.d;“写一篇科学研究文章”,n.d),这些模型的有效性尚未建立。本章探讨了有效的在线同步写作教学(包括语言和元语言层面)与发达的自我调节学习框架相结合是否可以促进研究生写作研究的过程。本研究的主要目标是发展教学方法,以提高研究生的研究素养(写作)与他们的自我调节学习。为此,我们开发了一门独特的在线课程,结合了SRL和英语写作研究。本研究的两个具体目标是:•评估为期五个月的研究生在线写作课程的有效性,该课程旨在提高他们的研究写作能力(在语言和元语言层面)和SRL能力;•在自我调节学习的框架内,检查一门旨在教授写作研究的在线课程是否会导致更高的SRL结果和更好的写作出版技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Writing-for-Publication: Online Pedagogy for Post/Graduate Research Writing
“Publish or perish” pressure is increasing and has been experienced by researchers all over the world, as well as by post/graduate students who are facing the challenge of writing their research papers in highly diverse, multinational and competitive academic environments.
Research studies on writing for publication are grounded in various theoretical frameworks, and focus on such issues as: the importance of English linguistic competence within local contexts (Casanave & Hubbard, 1992), inequality in centre vs periphery scholars’ experiences in the process of knowledge production (Canagarajah, 1996; Curry & Lillis, 2004, 2010; see the chapter by Habibie in this volume), discourse analysis of professional writing (Swales, 1981; 1990; 2004), the intelligibility of a researcher’s community (Flowerdew, 2001, 2008), as well as pedagogies of teaching writing for publication (e.g., Mezek, 2013). Successful approaches of teaching how to write for publication include using “moves” which have emerged from discourse analysis and corpus linguistics; writing guidelines for effective autonomous research writing and independent study; and English-medium text books on academic and scientific writing for classroom-based modes (e.g., “Academic writing for graduate students” by Swales and Feak, 2012). Although the research in the field of writing for publication has been conducted for more than 20 years, and a number of pedagogical models on teaching writing for publication have been developed (e.g., “Writing for scholarly publication”, n.d.; “Writing a scientific research article”, n.d.), the effectiveness of these models has not been established.
This chapter investigates whether effective online synchronous instruction on writing to publish (both at the linguistic and metalinguistic levels) combined with a developed self-regulated learning framework can facilitate the process of writing research at a post/graduate level. The main goal of the study is to develop pedagogy to improve post/graduate students’ research literacies (writing) in relation to their self-regulated learning. To this end, a unique online course was developed combining SRL and writing research in English. Two specific goals of the study are:
• to assess the effectiveness of a five-month online writing course for post/graduate students aimed at improving their research writing competencies (at the linguistic and meta-linguistic levels) and SRL competence;
• to examine if an online course aimed at teaching both writing research, within the framework of self-regulated learning would lead to higher SRL results and better writing for publication skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Who Benefits from the GED? New Regression Discontinuity Evidence from Massachusetts Exploring the Influence of Personal Motivations, Beliefs and Attitudes on Students’ Post-Graduation Migration Intentions: Evidence from Three Major Romanian Universities UQ Summer Research Scholar Program: Insights and Reflections from the Pitching Research 'I-TEMPLATES' Team Writing-for-Publication: Online Pedagogy for Post/Graduate Research Writing MBA Strategy and Research Project Series 3, 2001, Sims Action Research & Recap. (Presentation Slides)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1