{"title":"使用集成机器学习的信用评分","authors":"Ping Yao","doi":"10.1109/HIS.2009.264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we applied ensemble machine learning to evaluate credit scoring. With decision tree as the baseline algorithm, two popular ensemble learning methods, bagging and boosting, were evaluated across different experiment conditions: using all 14 features, using selected 6 features on Australian credit data form UCI data set. Results showed that in experiments with all features improved performance was achieved by ensemble learning. The best result was obtained in adaboost CART with 14 features, in which the overall correct rate increases from 83.25% to 85.86%.","PeriodicalId":414085,"journal":{"name":"2009 Ninth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Credit Scoring Using Ensemble Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"Ping Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HIS.2009.264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we applied ensemble machine learning to evaluate credit scoring. With decision tree as the baseline algorithm, two popular ensemble learning methods, bagging and boosting, were evaluated across different experiment conditions: using all 14 features, using selected 6 features on Australian credit data form UCI data set. Results showed that in experiments with all features improved performance was achieved by ensemble learning. The best result was obtained in adaboost CART with 14 features, in which the overall correct rate increases from 83.25% to 85.86%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 Ninth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 Ninth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HIS.2009.264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 Ninth International Conference on Hybrid Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HIS.2009.264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In this study, we applied ensemble machine learning to evaluate credit scoring. With decision tree as the baseline algorithm, two popular ensemble learning methods, bagging and boosting, were evaluated across different experiment conditions: using all 14 features, using selected 6 features on Australian credit data form UCI data set. Results showed that in experiments with all features improved performance was achieved by ensemble learning. The best result was obtained in adaboost CART with 14 features, in which the overall correct rate increases from 83.25% to 85.86%.