选举期间和之后Facebook上的政治存在:葡萄牙案例

Nazmiye Gizem Bacaksizlar Turbic, Jorge Martins Rosa
{"title":"选举期间和之后Facebook上的政治存在:葡萄牙案例","authors":"Nazmiye Gizem Bacaksizlar Turbic, Jorge Martins Rosa","doi":"10.15847/obsobs17220232132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motivated by the conjecture that traditional political communication patterns and strategies are broken within social network sites, this paper investigates the presence of Portuguese political parties on Facebook during a year with two major elections (European and Legislative), both from the posting activity aspect and the user engagement. The following research questions are formulated: Is it possible to identify distinctive styles adopted by different parties or to demonstrate that their audience acknowledges them in a different manner? If such distinction is possible, can it be correlated with the party’s foundation time, relative size, or place within the political spectrum? Our analysis shows that the common assumptions that older parties do not behave like newer ones fail when tested against the collected data. We also observe higher levels of user engagement attracted by newly founded, minor, and right-leaning parties, compared to their older, major, and left-leaning counterparts, respectively.","PeriodicalId":149155,"journal":{"name":"Observatorio (OBS*)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Presence on Facebook during and beyond Election Campaigns: The Portuguese Case\",\"authors\":\"Nazmiye Gizem Bacaksizlar Turbic, Jorge Martins Rosa\",\"doi\":\"10.15847/obsobs17220232132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Motivated by the conjecture that traditional political communication patterns and strategies are broken within social network sites, this paper investigates the presence of Portuguese political parties on Facebook during a year with two major elections (European and Legislative), both from the posting activity aspect and the user engagement. The following research questions are formulated: Is it possible to identify distinctive styles adopted by different parties or to demonstrate that their audience acknowledges them in a different manner? If such distinction is possible, can it be correlated with the party’s foundation time, relative size, or place within the political spectrum? Our analysis shows that the common assumptions that older parties do not behave like newer ones fail when tested against the collected data. We also observe higher levels of user engagement attracted by newly founded, minor, and right-leaning parties, compared to their older, major, and left-leaning counterparts, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Observatorio (OBS*)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Observatorio (OBS*)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15847/obsobs17220232132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observatorio (OBS*)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15847/obsobs17220232132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于传统的政治沟通模式和策略在社交网站中被打破的猜想,本文从发帖活动和用户参与度两方面调查了葡萄牙政党在Facebook上的存在,这一年有两次主要选举(欧洲和立法)。制定了以下研究问题:是否有可能识别不同政党采用的独特风格,或者证明他们的听众以不同的方式承认他们?如果这种区别是可能的,它是否与党的成立时间、相对规模或在政治光谱中的位置有关?我们的分析表明,在针对收集到的数据进行测试时,“老政党不像新政党那样行事”的普遍假设是不成立的。我们还观察到,与老牌政党、主流政党和左倾政党相比,新成立政党、小党派和右倾政党所吸引的用户参与度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Political Presence on Facebook during and beyond Election Campaigns: The Portuguese Case
Motivated by the conjecture that traditional political communication patterns and strategies are broken within social network sites, this paper investigates the presence of Portuguese political parties on Facebook during a year with two major elections (European and Legislative), both from the posting activity aspect and the user engagement. The following research questions are formulated: Is it possible to identify distinctive styles adopted by different parties or to demonstrate that their audience acknowledges them in a different manner? If such distinction is possible, can it be correlated with the party’s foundation time, relative size, or place within the political spectrum? Our analysis shows that the common assumptions that older parties do not behave like newer ones fail when tested against the collected data. We also observe higher levels of user engagement attracted by newly founded, minor, and right-leaning parties, compared to their older, major, and left-leaning counterparts, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How is Portugal addressing disinformation? Results of a mapping of initiatives (2010-2023) Decoding algorithmic literacy among journalists Perceptions of University Students in Communication about Disinformation: Special Issue (2024) Media Literacy to Tackle Disinformation A taxonomy for Media Literacy in Portugal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1