{"title":"版权法对功能兼容微程序设备开发的影响","authors":"Douglas K. Derwin, D. Siegel","doi":"10.1145/379531.379533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On September 22, 1986, a federal court ruled, for the first time, that microcode is copyrightable. NEC Corp. v. Intel Corp., 645 F. Supp. 590 (N.D. Cal. 1986). The wisdom of this ruling is open to question, but its effect is not: the microcode community will have to adapt to new rules, some of them difficult to understand, most of them involving additional cost and labor.","PeriodicalId":138968,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigmicro Newsletter","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of copyright law on the development of functionally compatible functionally compatible microprogrammed devices\",\"authors\":\"Douglas K. Derwin, D. Siegel\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/379531.379533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On September 22, 1986, a federal court ruled, for the first time, that microcode is copyrightable. NEC Corp. v. Intel Corp., 645 F. Supp. 590 (N.D. Cal. 1986). The wisdom of this ruling is open to question, but its effect is not: the microcode community will have to adapt to new rules, some of them difficult to understand, most of them involving additional cost and labor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Sigmicro Newsletter\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Sigmicro Newsletter\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/379531.379533\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigmicro Newsletter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/379531.379533","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of copyright law on the development of functionally compatible functionally compatible microprogrammed devices
On September 22, 1986, a federal court ruled, for the first time, that microcode is copyrightable. NEC Corp. v. Intel Corp., 645 F. Supp. 590 (N.D. Cal. 1986). The wisdom of this ruling is open to question, but its effect is not: the microcode community will have to adapt to new rules, some of them difficult to understand, most of them involving additional cost and labor.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
