国际顶级品牌估值

S. Pavlov
{"title":"国际顶级品牌估值","authors":"S. Pavlov","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2432846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An integral part of quite a number of companies nowadays, a brand is an intangible asset directly influencing a business’ profitability. The present paper compares Forbes’ 2012 The World’s Most Valuable Brands rating with the results of its own evaluation based on analysing the price and price to earnings ratio of ordinary stocks and depositary receipts of the companies during the same period. As the method employed by Forbes differs from the one used in this paper, this raises a couple of issues, addressed below: 1) If Forbes’ method is considered perfect, would there be a significant relationship (e.g., regressional) between its results and the results obtained though the method used in the present paper? 2) If Forbes’ method cannot be taken for a reference, what prompted the results obtained through the present paper’s method?","PeriodicalId":269853,"journal":{"name":"MKTG: Branding & Brand Management (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Top International Brands Valuation\",\"authors\":\"S. Pavlov\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2432846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An integral part of quite a number of companies nowadays, a brand is an intangible asset directly influencing a business’ profitability. The present paper compares Forbes’ 2012 The World’s Most Valuable Brands rating with the results of its own evaluation based on analysing the price and price to earnings ratio of ordinary stocks and depositary receipts of the companies during the same period. As the method employed by Forbes differs from the one used in this paper, this raises a couple of issues, addressed below: 1) If Forbes’ method is considered perfect, would there be a significant relationship (e.g., regressional) between its results and the results obtained though the method used in the present paper? 2) If Forbes’ method cannot be taken for a reference, what prompted the results obtained through the present paper’s method?\",\"PeriodicalId\":269853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MKTG: Branding & Brand Management (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MKTG: Branding & Brand Management (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2432846\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MKTG: Branding & Brand Management (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2432846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

品牌是当今许多公司不可或缺的一部分,它是一种无形资产,直接影响着企业的盈利能力。本文将福布斯2012年全球最具价值品牌的排名与福布斯在分析公司同期普通股和存托凭证的价格和市盈率的基础上得出的评估结果进行比较。由于福布斯采用的方法与本文中使用的方法不同,这就提出了几个问题,如下所述:1)如果福布斯的方法被认为是完美的,那么其结果与本文中使用的方法获得的结果之间是否存在显著的关系(例如,回归)?2)如果福布斯的方法不能作为参考,那么是什么促使了本文方法得到的结果?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Top International Brands Valuation
An integral part of quite a number of companies nowadays, a brand is an intangible asset directly influencing a business’ profitability. The present paper compares Forbes’ 2012 The World’s Most Valuable Brands rating with the results of its own evaluation based on analysing the price and price to earnings ratio of ordinary stocks and depositary receipts of the companies during the same period. As the method employed by Forbes differs from the one used in this paper, this raises a couple of issues, addressed below: 1) If Forbes’ method is considered perfect, would there be a significant relationship (e.g., regressional) between its results and the results obtained though the method used in the present paper? 2) If Forbes’ method cannot be taken for a reference, what prompted the results obtained through the present paper’s method?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Brand Image on Consumer Buying Behaviour A Model of Brand Architecture Choice: A House of Brands vs. A Branded House Developing a Conceptual Model for Holistic Branding – Finding the Sweet Spot Where Internal Brand Culture Intersects With External Brand Experience The Effect of Brand Perception, Reputation and Personality on the Brand Loyalty: The Case Study of Turk Telecom Validating a Theoretical Model for Hotel Brand Love Amongst Young Indian Tourists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1