社会媒体主导政府成绩单影响养老院需求吗?

Yuanchen Li, Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu, S. F. Lu
{"title":"社会媒体主导政府成绩单影响养老院需求吗?","authors":"Yuanchen Li, Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu, S. F. Lu","doi":"10.1287/msom.2021.0303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem definition: Social media has become an indispensable platform for disseminating quality information to consumers across various service sectors. Recently, it has extended its influence to healthcare services, which traditionally relied on government report cards to disclose standardized quality information to the public. This article explores the impact of social media on consumer demand for healthcare services and compares its effectiveness with government report cards. Methodology/results: We analyze quality ratings of U.S. nursing homes collected from two information channels: (1) consumer ratings on Yelp and (2) government ratings on Nursing Home Compare, both of which adopt a five-star quality rating scale and are accessible on the Internet. We employ the method of difference-in-differences with continuous treatment intensity and instrumental variables to analyze the data. Using nursing home resident admissions as a proxy for consumer demand, we find that higher Yelp ratings led to higher consumer demand, particularly among Medicare-covered consumers. Furthermore, the effect of Yelp ratings was primarily driven by extreme ratings (one-star or five-star), as opposed to neutral ratings. We also find that Yelp ratings exerted a stronger effect on consumer demand than government ratings. This dominance of Yelp ratings over government ratings was observed primarily in markets with high Yelp penetration or markets with low and medium consumer education levels. Although higher Yelp ratings were associated with increased net incomes, we find little evidence that nursing homes made quality improvement in response to their Yelp ratings. Managerial implications: We recommend that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recognize social media platforms as valuable sources of information and collaborate with reputable platforms, such as Yelp, to promote public awareness of government report cards like Nursing Home Compare. Moreover, we advise nursing home operators to proactively manage their reputation on social media by promptly addressing consumer complaints and implementing quality improvement measures. Funding: Y. Li was supported by the Shanghai Sailing Program [Grant 22YF1451000] and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. S. F. Lu was supported by the Gerald Lyles rising star fund. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0303 .","PeriodicalId":119284,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","volume":"4 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Social Media Dominate Government Report Cards in Influencing Nursing Home Demand?\",\"authors\":\"Yuanchen Li, Lauren Xiaoyuan Lu, S. F. Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/msom.2021.0303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Problem definition: Social media has become an indispensable platform for disseminating quality information to consumers across various service sectors. Recently, it has extended its influence to healthcare services, which traditionally relied on government report cards to disclose standardized quality information to the public. This article explores the impact of social media on consumer demand for healthcare services and compares its effectiveness with government report cards. Methodology/results: We analyze quality ratings of U.S. nursing homes collected from two information channels: (1) consumer ratings on Yelp and (2) government ratings on Nursing Home Compare, both of which adopt a five-star quality rating scale and are accessible on the Internet. We employ the method of difference-in-differences with continuous treatment intensity and instrumental variables to analyze the data. Using nursing home resident admissions as a proxy for consumer demand, we find that higher Yelp ratings led to higher consumer demand, particularly among Medicare-covered consumers. Furthermore, the effect of Yelp ratings was primarily driven by extreme ratings (one-star or five-star), as opposed to neutral ratings. We also find that Yelp ratings exerted a stronger effect on consumer demand than government ratings. This dominance of Yelp ratings over government ratings was observed primarily in markets with high Yelp penetration or markets with low and medium consumer education levels. Although higher Yelp ratings were associated with increased net incomes, we find little evidence that nursing homes made quality improvement in response to their Yelp ratings. Managerial implications: We recommend that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recognize social media platforms as valuable sources of information and collaborate with reputable platforms, such as Yelp, to promote public awareness of government report cards like Nursing Home Compare. Moreover, we advise nursing home operators to proactively manage their reputation on social media by promptly addressing consumer complaints and implementing quality improvement measures. Funding: Y. Li was supported by the Shanghai Sailing Program [Grant 22YF1451000] and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. S. F. Lu was supported by the Gerald Lyles rising star fund. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0303 .\",\"PeriodicalId\":119284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management\",\"volume\":\"4 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

问题定义:社交媒体已经成为向各个服务部门的消费者传播高质量信息的不可或缺的平台。最近,它已将影响力扩大到医疗保健服务领域,传统上,医疗保健服务依赖政府成绩单向公众披露标准化的质量信息。本文探讨了社交媒体对消费者医疗保健服务需求的影响,并将其有效性与政府报告卡进行了比较。方法/结果:我们分析了从两个信息渠道收集的美国养老院的质量评级:(1)Yelp上的消费者评级和(2)nursing Home Compare上的政府评级,这两个信息渠道都采用了五星级的质量评级量表,并且可以在互联网上获得。我们采用连续治疗强度和工具变量的差中差法来分析数据。使用养老院居民入院率作为消费者需求的代理,我们发现更高的Yelp评级导致更高的消费者需求,特别是在医疗保险覆盖的消费者中。此外,Yelp评级的影响主要是由极端评级(一星或五星)驱动的,而不是中性评级。我们还发现Yelp评级对消费者需求的影响强于政府评级。这种Yelp评级高于政府评级的主导地位主要出现在Yelp渗透率较高的市场或消费者教育水平较低和中等的市场。虽然较高的Yelp评级与净收入增加有关,但我们发现很少有证据表明养老院在回应其Yelp评级时做出了质量改进。管理意义:我们建议医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心将社交媒体平台视为有价值的信息来源,并与Yelp等知名平台合作,以提高公众对养老院比较等政府成绩单的认识。此外,我们建议养老院经营者积极管理其在社交媒体上的声誉,及时处理消费者投诉并实施质量改进措施。基金资助:李毅获上海帆船计划[基金号:22YF1451000]和中央高校基本科研业务费专项资助。吕绍夫得到了杰拉尔德莱尔斯新星基金的支持。补充材料:在线附录可在https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0303上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Social Media Dominate Government Report Cards in Influencing Nursing Home Demand?
Problem definition: Social media has become an indispensable platform for disseminating quality information to consumers across various service sectors. Recently, it has extended its influence to healthcare services, which traditionally relied on government report cards to disclose standardized quality information to the public. This article explores the impact of social media on consumer demand for healthcare services and compares its effectiveness with government report cards. Methodology/results: We analyze quality ratings of U.S. nursing homes collected from two information channels: (1) consumer ratings on Yelp and (2) government ratings on Nursing Home Compare, both of which adopt a five-star quality rating scale and are accessible on the Internet. We employ the method of difference-in-differences with continuous treatment intensity and instrumental variables to analyze the data. Using nursing home resident admissions as a proxy for consumer demand, we find that higher Yelp ratings led to higher consumer demand, particularly among Medicare-covered consumers. Furthermore, the effect of Yelp ratings was primarily driven by extreme ratings (one-star or five-star), as opposed to neutral ratings. We also find that Yelp ratings exerted a stronger effect on consumer demand than government ratings. This dominance of Yelp ratings over government ratings was observed primarily in markets with high Yelp penetration or markets with low and medium consumer education levels. Although higher Yelp ratings were associated with increased net incomes, we find little evidence that nursing homes made quality improvement in response to their Yelp ratings. Managerial implications: We recommend that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recognize social media platforms as valuable sources of information and collaborate with reputable platforms, such as Yelp, to promote public awareness of government report cards like Nursing Home Compare. Moreover, we advise nursing home operators to proactively manage their reputation on social media by promptly addressing consumer complaints and implementing quality improvement measures. Funding: Y. Li was supported by the Shanghai Sailing Program [Grant 22YF1451000] and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. S. F. Lu was supported by the Gerald Lyles rising star fund. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0303 .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physician Adoption of AI Assistant Disclosing Delivery Performance Information When Consumers Are Sensitive to Promised Delivery Time, Delivery Reliability, and Price Loyalty Currency and Mental Accounting: Do Consumers Treat Points Like Money? Dealership or Marketplace with Fulfillment Services: A Dynamic Comparison Introduction: Frontiers in Operations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1