瑞芬太尼与右美托咪定在全麻鼻整形术中的效果比较

Z. Ersoy, A. Uslu, BegümNemika Gökdemir, N. Çekmen, S. Jafarov
{"title":"瑞芬太尼与右美托咪定在全麻鼻整形术中的效果比较","authors":"Z. Ersoy, A. Uslu, BegümNemika Gökdemir, N. Çekmen, S. Jafarov","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_2_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective We aim to compare the effects of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine administered under general anesthesia in patients undergoing rhinoplasty. The primary outcomes were hemodynamics, postoperative pain, and recovery; the secondary outcomes were PONV, shivering, and patient and surgeon satisfaction. Methods In this randomized controlled, double-blind trial, 62 patients 18–65 years of age and ASA I-II class who underwent rhinoplasty under elective conditions were accepted to the study and divided into two groups. Group R (n = 31) received 0.25 μg/kg/min intravenously infusion during the operation without a loading dose. Group D (n = 31) was initiated with a bolus of 1 μg/kg over 10 min before induction of anesthesia and then received 0.5 μg/kg/h intravenously infusion during the operation. The patient’s pain level was assessed at 5 min, 30 min, and 12 h after surgery. Intraoperative hemodynamics, vital parameters, PONV, shivering, and patient and surgical satisfaction were evaluated. Results Remifentanil and dexmedetomidine had similar effects on hemodynamics and additional analgesic requirements. No postoperative complications, including PONV, occurred in either group. Recovery from anesthesia was faster, and pain scores were lower in the dexmedetomidine group. While patient satisfaction was similar, surgeon satisfaction was higher in the remifentanil group. Conclusion We think dexmedetomidine can be used safely and effectively as an adjuvant during general anesthesia for nasal surgery.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the effects of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine in patients under general anesthesia for rhinoplasty\",\"authors\":\"Z. Ersoy, A. Uslu, BegümNemika Gökdemir, N. Çekmen, S. Jafarov\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/roaic.roaic_2_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective We aim to compare the effects of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine administered under general anesthesia in patients undergoing rhinoplasty. The primary outcomes were hemodynamics, postoperative pain, and recovery; the secondary outcomes were PONV, shivering, and patient and surgeon satisfaction. Methods In this randomized controlled, double-blind trial, 62 patients 18–65 years of age and ASA I-II class who underwent rhinoplasty under elective conditions were accepted to the study and divided into two groups. Group R (n = 31) received 0.25 μg/kg/min intravenously infusion during the operation without a loading dose. Group D (n = 31) was initiated with a bolus of 1 μg/kg over 10 min before induction of anesthesia and then received 0.5 μg/kg/h intravenously infusion during the operation. The patient’s pain level was assessed at 5 min, 30 min, and 12 h after surgery. Intraoperative hemodynamics, vital parameters, PONV, shivering, and patient and surgical satisfaction were evaluated. Results Remifentanil and dexmedetomidine had similar effects on hemodynamics and additional analgesic requirements. No postoperative complications, including PONV, occurred in either group. Recovery from anesthesia was faster, and pain scores were lower in the dexmedetomidine group. While patient satisfaction was similar, surgeon satisfaction was higher in the remifentanil group. Conclusion We think dexmedetomidine can be used safely and effectively as an adjuvant during general anesthesia for nasal surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_2_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_2_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较全身麻醉下瑞芬太尼与右美托咪定在鼻整形术中的应用效果。主要结局是血流动力学、术后疼痛和恢复;次要结果为PONV、颤抖、患者和外科医生满意度。方法随机对照双盲试验,选取62例18-65岁ASA I-II级择期行鼻整形术的患者,分为两组。R组(n = 31)术中静脉滴注0.25 μg/kg/min,不加负荷剂量。D组(31例)在麻醉诱导前10 min内滴注1 μg/kg,术中静脉滴注0.5 μg/kg/h。分别于术后5分钟、30分钟和12小时评估患者的疼痛水平。评估术中血流动力学、生命参数、PONV、寒颤以及患者和手术满意度。结果瑞芬太尼和右美托咪定对血流动力学和额外镇痛需求的影响相似。两组均未发生包括PONV在内的术后并发症。右美托咪定组麻醉后恢复较快,疼痛评分较低。虽然患者满意度相似,但瑞芬太尼组的外科医生满意度更高。结论右美托咪定可作为鼻外科全身麻醉的辅助用药,安全有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the effects of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine in patients under general anesthesia for rhinoplasty
Objective We aim to compare the effects of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine administered under general anesthesia in patients undergoing rhinoplasty. The primary outcomes were hemodynamics, postoperative pain, and recovery; the secondary outcomes were PONV, shivering, and patient and surgeon satisfaction. Methods In this randomized controlled, double-blind trial, 62 patients 18–65 years of age and ASA I-II class who underwent rhinoplasty under elective conditions were accepted to the study and divided into two groups. Group R (n = 31) received 0.25 μg/kg/min intravenously infusion during the operation without a loading dose. Group D (n = 31) was initiated with a bolus of 1 μg/kg over 10 min before induction of anesthesia and then received 0.5 μg/kg/h intravenously infusion during the operation. The patient’s pain level was assessed at 5 min, 30 min, and 12 h after surgery. Intraoperative hemodynamics, vital parameters, PONV, shivering, and patient and surgical satisfaction were evaluated. Results Remifentanil and dexmedetomidine had similar effects on hemodynamics and additional analgesic requirements. No postoperative complications, including PONV, occurred in either group. Recovery from anesthesia was faster, and pain scores were lower in the dexmedetomidine group. While patient satisfaction was similar, surgeon satisfaction was higher in the remifentanil group. Conclusion We think dexmedetomidine can be used safely and effectively as an adjuvant during general anesthesia for nasal surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of combined pulsed radiofrequency and steroid injection to the dorsal root ganglion in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a prospective randomized clinical trial Sacrococcygeal local anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for pilonidal sinus surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study Role of enteral metoprolol tartrate on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of septic shock patients of various pretargeted heart rate groups Prediction of protective lung tidal volume using the ulna length in Egyptian adults Characteristics and clinical outcomes of critically ill pregnant patients with COVID-19 disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1