中国和俄罗斯的宗教和良心自由:寻找新的共同点

N. Shumakova, E. Titova
{"title":"中国和俄罗斯的宗教和良心自由:寻找新的共同点","authors":"N. Shumakova, E. Titova","doi":"10.54934/ijlcw.v2i1.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main hypothesis of this article is a possibility of creating a new conventionbyChina and Russia for protecting the fundamental human right to freedom of religion and conscience on a new international level, independent from the West. The need of developing such a convention or even a new international organization is conditioned by the withdrawal of Russia from the Council of Europe and the European Convention on Human Rights. We suggest that this cooperation can be beneficial for both parties because it should help secure their sovereignty and improve the implementation of national legislations. The aim of our research is to propose measures of increasing the efficiency of realization of freedom of religion and conscience in China in Russia. In oder to reach it, we employed such methods of legal comparativistics as functional, normative and external comparative analysis andstudiedthe Chinese and Russianspecifics of the legal recognition and protectionof this right. The findingsof our studysuggest that theexisting limitations of itshould be seen as a response to challenges China and Russia have been facing as developing multicultural and policonfessional states. We also discovered that despite its cultural, ideological and political differences, Russia and China share a number of almost identical mechanisms for the realisation of religious liberty.","PeriodicalId":212137,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law in Changing World","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND CONSCIENCE IN CHINA AND RUSSIA: SEARCHING FORNEW COMMONS\",\"authors\":\"N. Shumakova, E. Titova\",\"doi\":\"10.54934/ijlcw.v2i1.46\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main hypothesis of this article is a possibility of creating a new conventionbyChina and Russia for protecting the fundamental human right to freedom of religion and conscience on a new international level, independent from the West. The need of developing such a convention or even a new international organization is conditioned by the withdrawal of Russia from the Council of Europe and the European Convention on Human Rights. We suggest that this cooperation can be beneficial for both parties because it should help secure their sovereignty and improve the implementation of national legislations. The aim of our research is to propose measures of increasing the efficiency of realization of freedom of religion and conscience in China in Russia. In oder to reach it, we employed such methods of legal comparativistics as functional, normative and external comparative analysis andstudiedthe Chinese and Russianspecifics of the legal recognition and protectionof this right. The findingsof our studysuggest that theexisting limitations of itshould be seen as a response to challenges China and Russia have been facing as developing multicultural and policonfessional states. We also discovered that despite its cultural, ideological and political differences, Russia and China share a number of almost identical mechanisms for the realisation of religious liberty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law in Changing World\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law in Changing World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v2i1.46\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law in Changing World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54934/ijlcw.v2i1.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的主要假设是中国和俄罗斯有可能在新的国际层面上独立于西方,建立一个新的公约,以保护宗教自由和良心自由的基本人权。制定这样一项公约或甚至一个新的国际组织的需要,是以俄罗斯退出欧洲委员会和《欧洲人权公约》为条件的。我们建议,这种合作对双方都是有益的,因为它应有助于确保它们的主权和改进国家立法的执行。我们的研究目的是提出提高中国在俄罗斯实现宗教和良心自由效率的措施。为此,我们运用功能比较、规范比较和外部比较分析等法律比较方法,研究了中俄两国对这一权利的法律承认与保护的具体情况。我们的研究结果表明,现有的限制应被视为对中国和俄罗斯作为发展中的多元文化和政治专业国家所面临的挑战的回应。我们还发现,尽管在文化、意识形态和政治上存在差异,但俄罗斯和中国在实现宗教自由方面有着许多几乎相同的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND CONSCIENCE IN CHINA AND RUSSIA: SEARCHING FORNEW COMMONS
The main hypothesis of this article is a possibility of creating a new conventionbyChina and Russia for protecting the fundamental human right to freedom of religion and conscience on a new international level, independent from the West. The need of developing such a convention or even a new international organization is conditioned by the withdrawal of Russia from the Council of Europe and the European Convention on Human Rights. We suggest that this cooperation can be beneficial for both parties because it should help secure their sovereignty and improve the implementation of national legislations. The aim of our research is to propose measures of increasing the efficiency of realization of freedom of religion and conscience in China in Russia. In oder to reach it, we employed such methods of legal comparativistics as functional, normative and external comparative analysis andstudiedthe Chinese and Russianspecifics of the legal recognition and protectionof this right. The findingsof our studysuggest that theexisting limitations of itshould be seen as a response to challenges China and Russia have been facing as developing multicultural and policonfessional states. We also discovered that despite its cultural, ideological and political differences, Russia and China share a number of almost identical mechanisms for the realisation of religious liberty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY: PERSPECTIVE OF THE GLOBAL SOUTH EMPLOYMENT IMPLICATIONS FOR NATURALIZED SOUTH AFRICAN CITIZENS Introduction to the Second Issue of 2023 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ITS ROLE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FUTURE OF ARBITRATION THE HUMAN RIGHT TO SAFE DRINKING WATER:A STUDY OF THE PROSPECTS FOR THE ACCESSION OF ARAB COUNTRIES TO THE 1992 WATER CONVENTION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1