对技术征税:国际经济法下澳大利亚数字服务税的风险

A. Mitchell, Tania Voon, J. Hepburn
{"title":"对技术征税:国际经济法下澳大利亚数字服务税的风险","authors":"A. Mitchell, Tania Voon, J. Hepburn","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3347655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Along with many other countries, Australia is considering implementing a tax on digital services to try to capture more of the revenues of digital businesses, which may operate without a substantial physical presence in the country. Although traditional approaches to tax may need wholesale revision to adjust to the digitalisation of the global economy, these changes are best pursued through a multilateral process, which is already ongoing through the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the G20, and in which Australia is participating. An interim Australian digital services tax risks breaching Australia’s obligations under international economic law: namely international trade law and international investment law. The relevant trade and investment rules contain certain flexibilities, including some specific references to taxation, that might assist in justifying such a tax. However, the overarching problem that may lead to a breach of at least some of the relevant treaties is that an Australian digital services tax is likely to burden United States businesses disproportionately, particularly if smaller businesses are exempt as is envisaged. In the current global economic and political climate, provoking retaliation of the United States or further closing of national economies through the imposition of an Australian digital services tax is undesirable.","PeriodicalId":131289,"journal":{"name":"International Institutions: Laws","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taxing Tech: Risks of an Australian Digital Services Tax under International Economic Law\",\"authors\":\"A. Mitchell, Tania Voon, J. Hepburn\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3347655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Along with many other countries, Australia is considering implementing a tax on digital services to try to capture more of the revenues of digital businesses, which may operate without a substantial physical presence in the country. Although traditional approaches to tax may need wholesale revision to adjust to the digitalisation of the global economy, these changes are best pursued through a multilateral process, which is already ongoing through the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the G20, and in which Australia is participating. An interim Australian digital services tax risks breaching Australia’s obligations under international economic law: namely international trade law and international investment law. The relevant trade and investment rules contain certain flexibilities, including some specific references to taxation, that might assist in justifying such a tax. However, the overarching problem that may lead to a breach of at least some of the relevant treaties is that an Australian digital services tax is likely to burden United States businesses disproportionately, particularly if smaller businesses are exempt as is envisaged. In the current global economic and political climate, provoking retaliation of the United States or further closing of national economies through the imposition of an Australian digital services tax is undesirable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Institutions: Laws\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Institutions: Laws\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3347655\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Institutions: Laws","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3347655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

与许多其他国家一样,澳大利亚正在考虑对数字服务征税,以试图从数字业务中获取更多收入,这些业务可能在该国没有实质性的实体存在。尽管传统的税收方法可能需要大规模修改以适应全球经济的数字化,但这些变化最好通过多边进程来实现,这一进程已经通过经济合作与发展组织(oecd)和20国集团(G20)进行,澳大利亚正在参与其中。澳大利亚临时征收数字服务税可能会违反澳大利亚在国际经济法(即国际贸易法和国际投资法)下的义务。有关的贸易和投资规则具有某些灵活性,包括一些具体提到的税收,这可能有助于证明这种税收是合理的。然而,可能导致违反至少一些相关条约的首要问题是,澳大利亚的数字服务税可能会给美国企业带来不成比例的负担,特别是如果小型企业按照设想获得豁免的话。在当前的全球经济和政治气候下,通过征收澳大利亚数字服务税来引发美国的报复或进一步关闭国民经济是不可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taxing Tech: Risks of an Australian Digital Services Tax under International Economic Law
Along with many other countries, Australia is considering implementing a tax on digital services to try to capture more of the revenues of digital businesses, which may operate without a substantial physical presence in the country. Although traditional approaches to tax may need wholesale revision to adjust to the digitalisation of the global economy, these changes are best pursued through a multilateral process, which is already ongoing through the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the G20, and in which Australia is participating. An interim Australian digital services tax risks breaching Australia’s obligations under international economic law: namely international trade law and international investment law. The relevant trade and investment rules contain certain flexibilities, including some specific references to taxation, that might assist in justifying such a tax. However, the overarching problem that may lead to a breach of at least some of the relevant treaties is that an Australian digital services tax is likely to burden United States businesses disproportionately, particularly if smaller businesses are exempt as is envisaged. In the current global economic and political climate, provoking retaliation of the United States or further closing of national economies through the imposition of an Australian digital services tax is undesirable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
International Law of State Responsibility and COVID-19: an Ideology Critique Deferred Pay in Financial Services: Compliance, Productivity and Attracting Talent International Investment Law and Domestic Investment Rules: Tracing the Upstream and Downstream Flows On The Contribution of Investment Arbitration to Issues of Evidence and Procedure Before Other International Courts and Tribunals Human Rights Issues in Cameroon in the Case of the Independentists Arrested in Nigeria and Extradited to Cameroon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1