索洛维约夫的索菲亚和但丁的比阿特丽斯

W.E. Helleman
{"title":"索洛维约夫的索菲亚和但丁的比阿特丽斯","authors":"W.E. Helleman","doi":"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.1.065-079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the author claims that symbolist poets, such as A. Blok, who saw echoes of Dante's Beatrice in the image of Sofia by Vladimir Solovyov, were not mistaken. Parallels are drawn in the development of the theme of love in the works of symbolists and V. Solovyov. It is noted that the symbolist understanding of Sofia did not take into account the influence of Romanticism on the image of Sofia V. Solovyov, dominating in Russian culture and aesthetics of the late XIX century. Using historical, literary and philosophical methods, the author analyzes the reception of the image of Dante's Beatrice and Blokov's Beautiful Lady in the works of V. Solovyov. It is proved that the theme of love for a Beautiful Lady among the troubadours, transformed into a means of expressing love for God in the Divine Comedy, is also characteristic of Solovyov's theurgic approach to the transformative nature of beauty and love. Recognizing the historical distance between Dante and Solovyov, using literary and philosophical analysis, the use of themes of Christian Platonism is argued to solve two significant unresolved problems in understanding the image of Sophia: firstly, the gnostic dualism of the image of Sophia in Solovyov; secondly, the question of the divine status of Sophia. It is concluded that the reception of Platonism in Solovyov's work and his mystical understanding of the image of Sophia remained predominantly monistic, in accordance with traditional Neoplatonic mysticism.","PeriodicalId":445879,"journal":{"name":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"V.S. Solovyov’s Sophia and Dante’s Beatrice\",\"authors\":\"W.E. Helleman\",\"doi\":\"10.17588/2076-9210.2023.1.065-079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, the author claims that symbolist poets, such as A. Blok, who saw echoes of Dante's Beatrice in the image of Sofia by Vladimir Solovyov, were not mistaken. Parallels are drawn in the development of the theme of love in the works of symbolists and V. Solovyov. It is noted that the symbolist understanding of Sofia did not take into account the influence of Romanticism on the image of Sofia V. Solovyov, dominating in Russian culture and aesthetics of the late XIX century. Using historical, literary and philosophical methods, the author analyzes the reception of the image of Dante's Beatrice and Blokov's Beautiful Lady in the works of V. Solovyov. It is proved that the theme of love for a Beautiful Lady among the troubadours, transformed into a means of expressing love for God in the Divine Comedy, is also characteristic of Solovyov's theurgic approach to the transformative nature of beauty and love. Recognizing the historical distance between Dante and Solovyov, using literary and philosophical analysis, the use of themes of Christian Platonism is argued to solve two significant unresolved problems in understanding the image of Sophia: firstly, the gnostic dualism of the image of Sophia in Solovyov; secondly, the question of the divine status of Sophia. It is concluded that the reception of Platonism in Solovyov's work and his mystical understanding of the image of Sophia remained predominantly monistic, in accordance with traditional Neoplatonic mysticism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":445879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Solov’evskie issledovaniya\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Solov’evskie issledovaniya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.1.065-079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solov’evskie issledovaniya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17588/2076-9210.2023.1.065-079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,作者声称,象征主义诗人,如A.布洛克,在弗拉基米尔·索洛维约夫的索菲亚形象中看到但丁的比阿特丽斯的影子,并没有错。在象征主义者和索洛维约夫的作品中,爱情主题的发展也有相似之处。值得注意的是,对索非亚的象征主义理解没有考虑到浪漫主义对索非亚V.索洛维约夫形象的影响,这在十九世纪后期的俄罗斯文化和美学中占主导地位。作者运用历史、文学和哲学的方法,分析了但丁的比阿特丽斯和布洛科夫的美女形象在索洛维约夫作品中的接受情况。在《神曲》中,游吟诗人对美丽女子的爱这一主题被转化为对上帝的爱的一种表达方式,这也是索洛维约夫对美与爱的转化本质的一种魔法方法的特点。认识到但丁和索洛维约夫之间的历史距离,运用文学和哲学分析,运用基督教柏拉图主义的主题来解决理解索菲亚形象的两个重要的未解决的问题:首先,索洛维约夫的索菲亚形象的诺斯替主义二元论;第二,索菲亚的神圣地位问题。结论是,索洛维约夫作品中柏拉图主义的接受和他对索菲亚形象的神秘理解仍然主要是一元论,与传统的新柏拉图主义神秘主义一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
V.S. Solovyov’s Sophia and Dante’s Beatrice
In this study, the author claims that symbolist poets, such as A. Blok, who saw echoes of Dante's Beatrice in the image of Sofia by Vladimir Solovyov, were not mistaken. Parallels are drawn in the development of the theme of love in the works of symbolists and V. Solovyov. It is noted that the symbolist understanding of Sofia did not take into account the influence of Romanticism on the image of Sofia V. Solovyov, dominating in Russian culture and aesthetics of the late XIX century. Using historical, literary and philosophical methods, the author analyzes the reception of the image of Dante's Beatrice and Blokov's Beautiful Lady in the works of V. Solovyov. It is proved that the theme of love for a Beautiful Lady among the troubadours, transformed into a means of expressing love for God in the Divine Comedy, is also characteristic of Solovyov's theurgic approach to the transformative nature of beauty and love. Recognizing the historical distance between Dante and Solovyov, using literary and philosophical analysis, the use of themes of Christian Platonism is argued to solve two significant unresolved problems in understanding the image of Sophia: firstly, the gnostic dualism of the image of Sophia in Solovyov; secondly, the question of the divine status of Sophia. It is concluded that the reception of Platonism in Solovyov's work and his mystical understanding of the image of Sophia remained predominantly monistic, in accordance with traditional Neoplatonic mysticism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The First Edition of “The Justification of Good” (1897): Contemporaries’ Response. Part 4 The image of Philostratus in the works of K.K. Vaginov: experience of deconstruction “Real Deed of an Artist” and Philosophy of Art: Solovyev – Fyodorov – Chekrygin V.Y. Bryusov, N.F. Fedorov and the Fedorovians of the 1900s-1920s: The Question of Meaning and Goals of Art. Article one. What were Bryusov and Fedorov Arguing about in the House of Yu.P. Bartenev V.I. Lamansky. Historical letters on the attitude of Russian people to their tribesmen. The letter VI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1