正偏度、反杠杆、反向波动不对称与卖空约束:来自中国市场的证据

Liang Wu, Jingyi Luo, Yingkai Tang, Gregory Bardes
{"title":"正偏度、反杠杆、反向波动不对称与卖空约束:来自中国市场的证据","authors":"Liang Wu, Jingyi Luo, Yingkai Tang, Gregory Bardes","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2690988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are some statistical anomalies in the Chinese stock market, i.e., positive return skewness, anti-leverage effect (positive returns induce higher volatility than negative returns); and reverse volatility asymmetry (contemporaneous return-volatility correlation is positive). In this paper, we first confirm the existence of these anomalies using daily firm-level stock return data on the raw returns, excess returns and normalized excess returns. We empirically show that the asymmetry response of investors to news is one cause of the statistical anomalies if short sales are constrained. Then in the context of slow adoption of security lending policy, we conduct panel analysis and empirically verify that the lifting of short sale constraints leads to significantly less skewness, less anti-leverage effect and less reverse volatility asymmetry. Positive skewness is a feature of lottery. Investors are encouraged to bet on the upside lottery like potentials in the Chinese markets where the stocks skew more to the upside when short sales are constrained.","PeriodicalId":250928,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: General Finance","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positive Skewness, Anti-Leverage, Reverse Volatility Asymmetry, and Short Sale Constraints: Evidence from the Chinese Markets\",\"authors\":\"Liang Wu, Jingyi Luo, Yingkai Tang, Gregory Bardes\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2690988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are some statistical anomalies in the Chinese stock market, i.e., positive return skewness, anti-leverage effect (positive returns induce higher volatility than negative returns); and reverse volatility asymmetry (contemporaneous return-volatility correlation is positive). In this paper, we first confirm the existence of these anomalies using daily firm-level stock return data on the raw returns, excess returns and normalized excess returns. We empirically show that the asymmetry response of investors to news is one cause of the statistical anomalies if short sales are constrained. Then in the context of slow adoption of security lending policy, we conduct panel analysis and empirically verify that the lifting of short sale constraints leads to significantly less skewness, less anti-leverage effect and less reverse volatility asymmetry. Positive skewness is a feature of lottery. Investors are encouraged to bet on the upside lottery like potentials in the Chinese markets where the stocks skew more to the upside when short sales are constrained.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: General Finance\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: General Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2690988\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: General Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2690988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国股票市场存在一些统计异常,即正收益偏态、反杠杆效应(正收益比负收益诱导更高的波动率);反向波动率不对称(同期收益-波动率相关性为正)。在本文中,我们首先利用公司层面股票的原始收益、超额收益和标准化超额收益的每日数据来证实这些异常的存在。我们的经验表明,如果卖空受到限制,投资者对新闻的不对称反应是统计异常的一个原因。然后,在证券借贷政策实施缓慢的背景下,我们进行了面板分析,并实证验证了卖空约束的解除导致偏度显著降低,反杠杆效应显著降低,反向波动不对称性显著降低。正偏度是彩票的一个特征。投资者被鼓励押注上行彩票,比如中国市场的潜力。当卖空受到限制时,中国股市更倾向于上行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Positive Skewness, Anti-Leverage, Reverse Volatility Asymmetry, and Short Sale Constraints: Evidence from the Chinese Markets
There are some statistical anomalies in the Chinese stock market, i.e., positive return skewness, anti-leverage effect (positive returns induce higher volatility than negative returns); and reverse volatility asymmetry (contemporaneous return-volatility correlation is positive). In this paper, we first confirm the existence of these anomalies using daily firm-level stock return data on the raw returns, excess returns and normalized excess returns. We empirically show that the asymmetry response of investors to news is one cause of the statistical anomalies if short sales are constrained. Then in the context of slow adoption of security lending policy, we conduct panel analysis and empirically verify that the lifting of short sale constraints leads to significantly less skewness, less anti-leverage effect and less reverse volatility asymmetry. Positive skewness is a feature of lottery. Investors are encouraged to bet on the upside lottery like potentials in the Chinese markets where the stocks skew more to the upside when short sales are constrained.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Long-Term Debt on the Financial Growth of Non-Financial Firms Listed at the Nairobi Securities Exchange Obamacare and a Fix for the IRS Iteration Optimizing the Reliability of a Bank with Logistic Regression and Particle Swarm Optimization Trading in Complex Networks A Policy Compass for Ecological Economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1