数学实体的存在问题

E. Beth
{"title":"数学实体的存在问题","authors":"E. Beth","doi":"10.1017/S0950563600001913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"of Paper read on 2nd March, 1951. The problem of the existence of mathematical entities takes its origin from the fact that, while the truths of mathematics belong to those elements in human knowledge to which we ascribe the highest degree of certainty, we search in vain, in the world of human experience, for entities which present the properties described in these truths. The first attempts to solve i t : platonism, aristotelianism, and constructivism (Plotinus, Nicolaus Cusanus, Kepler, Hobbes), belong to speculative philosophy. The crisis in the foundations of mathematics, however, forced the mathematicians to consider the problem from their own point of view. At first, they borrowed their solutions from speculative philosophy. Later, the development of axiomatics in geometry led Poincare and Hilbert to accept the formal consistency of a system of axioms as a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a model. I t was observed by L. Lowenheim (1915) that, for axiom systems formulated within the Peirce-Schroder calculus, the existence of a model can be discussed in a rigorous manner. The development of his ideas led finally to the Lowenheim-Skolem-Godel theorem : an axiom system formulated within elementary logic has a model, if and only if it is formally consistent. Recently, this result has been extended to various other logical systems by A. Mostowski, L. Henkin, and Helena Rasiowa. Far from leading to a final settlement of the problem, however, this result was shown by Th. Skolem to give rise to a complete relativisation of mathematical existence. So it seems reasonable to reconsider the problem from the point of view of speculative philosophy ; of course, we cannot expect to obtain, on this basis, a deductive theory of mathematical existence. Nevertheless, it is felt that a realistic and pluralistic conception of human knowledge, which can borrow precious elements from older doctrines, may contribute to a clarification of the situation. terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950563600001913 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 207.241.231.83, on 30 Oct 2018 at 04:32:48, subject to the Cambridge Core","PeriodicalId":208421,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of The British Society for The History of Science","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1951-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Problem of the Existence of Mathematical Entities\",\"authors\":\"E. Beth\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0950563600001913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"of Paper read on 2nd March, 1951. The problem of the existence of mathematical entities takes its origin from the fact that, while the truths of mathematics belong to those elements in human knowledge to which we ascribe the highest degree of certainty, we search in vain, in the world of human experience, for entities which present the properties described in these truths. The first attempts to solve i t : platonism, aristotelianism, and constructivism (Plotinus, Nicolaus Cusanus, Kepler, Hobbes), belong to speculative philosophy. The crisis in the foundations of mathematics, however, forced the mathematicians to consider the problem from their own point of view. At first, they borrowed their solutions from speculative philosophy. Later, the development of axiomatics in geometry led Poincare and Hilbert to accept the formal consistency of a system of axioms as a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a model. I t was observed by L. Lowenheim (1915) that, for axiom systems formulated within the Peirce-Schroder calculus, the existence of a model can be discussed in a rigorous manner. The development of his ideas led finally to the Lowenheim-Skolem-Godel theorem : an axiom system formulated within elementary logic has a model, if and only if it is formally consistent. Recently, this result has been extended to various other logical systems by A. Mostowski, L. Henkin, and Helena Rasiowa. Far from leading to a final settlement of the problem, however, this result was shown by Th. Skolem to give rise to a complete relativisation of mathematical existence. So it seems reasonable to reconsider the problem from the point of view of speculative philosophy ; of course, we cannot expect to obtain, on this basis, a deductive theory of mathematical existence. Nevertheless, it is felt that a realistic and pluralistic conception of human knowledge, which can borrow precious elements from older doctrines, may contribute to a clarification of the situation. terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950563600001913 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 207.241.231.83, on 30 Oct 2018 at 04:32:48, subject to the Cambridge Core\",\"PeriodicalId\":208421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of The British Society for The History of Science\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1951-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of The British Society for The History of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950563600001913\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of The British Society for The History of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950563600001913","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

发表于1951年3月2日。数学实体存在的问题源于这样一个事实:虽然数学真理属于人类知识中那些我们认为具有最高确定性的要素,但我们在人类经验的世界中寻找具有这些真理所描述的性质的实体是徒劳的。最初试图解决这个问题的柏拉图主义、亚里士多德主义和建构主义(普罗提诺、库萨努斯、开普勒、霍布斯)属于思辨哲学。然而,数学基础的危机迫使数学家们从他们自己的角度来考虑这个问题。起初,他们从思辨哲学中借用了他们的解决方案。后来,几何中公理化的发展使庞加莱和希尔伯特接受了公理系统的形式一致性作为模型存在的充分必要条件。L. Lowenheim(1915)观察到,对于在Peirce-Schroder演算中表述的公理系统,可以严格地讨论模型的存在性。他的思想的发展最终导致了洛温海姆-斯科勒姆-哥德尔定理:在初等逻辑中表述的公理系统有一个模型,当且仅当它是形式上一致的。最近,这一结果被A. Mostowski, L. Henkin和Helena Rasiowa推广到其他各种逻辑系统。然而,这一结果远没有导致问题的最终解决。Skolem产生了数学存在的完全相对性。因此,从思辨哲学的角度重新思考这个问题似乎是合理的;当然,我们不能指望在此基础上得到数学存在的演绎理论。然而,人们认为,人类知识的现实和多元的概念可以从旧的学说中借鉴宝贵的因素,可能有助于澄清情况。使用条款,可在https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms。https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950563600001913从https://www.cambridge.org/core下载。IP地址:207.241.231.83,于2018年10月30日04:32:48,以剑桥核心为准
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Problem of the Existence of Mathematical Entities
of Paper read on 2nd March, 1951. The problem of the existence of mathematical entities takes its origin from the fact that, while the truths of mathematics belong to those elements in human knowledge to which we ascribe the highest degree of certainty, we search in vain, in the world of human experience, for entities which present the properties described in these truths. The first attempts to solve i t : platonism, aristotelianism, and constructivism (Plotinus, Nicolaus Cusanus, Kepler, Hobbes), belong to speculative philosophy. The crisis in the foundations of mathematics, however, forced the mathematicians to consider the problem from their own point of view. At first, they borrowed their solutions from speculative philosophy. Later, the development of axiomatics in geometry led Poincare and Hilbert to accept the formal consistency of a system of axioms as a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a model. I t was observed by L. Lowenheim (1915) that, for axiom systems formulated within the Peirce-Schroder calculus, the existence of a model can be discussed in a rigorous manner. The development of his ideas led finally to the Lowenheim-Skolem-Godel theorem : an axiom system formulated within elementary logic has a model, if and only if it is formally consistent. Recently, this result has been extended to various other logical systems by A. Mostowski, L. Henkin, and Helena Rasiowa. Far from leading to a final settlement of the problem, however, this result was shown by Th. Skolem to give rise to a complete relativisation of mathematical existence. So it seems reasonable to reconsider the problem from the point of view of speculative philosophy ; of course, we cannot expect to obtain, on this basis, a deductive theory of mathematical existence. Nevertheless, it is felt that a realistic and pluralistic conception of human knowledge, which can borrow precious elements from older doctrines, may contribute to a clarification of the situation. terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950563600001913 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 207.241.231.83, on 30 Oct 2018 at 04:32:48, subject to the Cambridge Core
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Georgius Agricola (1494–1555) . A monograph in the History of Science and Technology. Pp. 235; 206 illustrations. Published by the Polish Academy of Science, Wroclaw 1957. Price 42zJ. (14s. approx.). [In Polish]. The Dependence of Science on its History The Science Museum: The First Hundred Years . P. x + 85, with 37 illustrations. London, 1957: H.M. Stationery Office. 15s. net. The History of the Determination of the Ohm Arabic Astronomical and Astrological Sciences in Latin Translation: A Critical Bibliography , By Francis J. Carmody. Pp. vi + 193. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California, 1956: University of California Press (Agents: Cambridge University Press). 21 s . net.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1