沙特阿拉伯2019年疑似冠状病毒病急诊患者嗅觉缺失和老年痴呆检测

Osama Kentab, A. Ibrahim, Khaled R Soliman, Marzooqah Alanazi, Ahmed Alsunaid, Abdalmohsen Ababtain, Abdulaziz I Alresseeni, Abdulaziz Algarni, Khlalid Aljohani, Muna Aljahany
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯2019年疑似冠状病毒病急诊患者嗅觉缺失和老年痴呆检测","authors":"Osama Kentab, A. Ibrahim, Khaled R Soliman, Marzooqah Alanazi, Ahmed Alsunaid, Abdalmohsen Ababtain, Abdulaziz I Alresseeni, Abdulaziz Algarni, Khlalid Aljohani, Muna Aljahany","doi":"10.1177/03000605221096280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective This study investigated the role of objective olfactory dysfunction (OD) and gustatory dysfunction (GD) testing among patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who presented with respiratory symptoms. Methods A prospective, blinded, observational study was conducted in the emergency units of two tertiary hospitals. Participants were asked to identify scents in the pocket smell test (PST) and flavors in four different solutions in the gustatory dysfunction test (GDT). We assessed the level of agreement between objective findings and self-reported symptoms. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of chemosensory dysfunction for diagnosing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Results Of 250 participants, 74 (29.6%) were SARS-CoV-2-positive. There was slight agreement between self-reported symptoms and objective findings (kappa = 0.13 and 0.10 for OD and GD, respectively). OD assessed by the PST was independently associated with COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio = 1.89, 95% confidence interval, 1.04–3.46). This association was stronger when OD was combined with objective GD, cough, and fever (adjusted odds ratio = 7.33, 95% confidence interval, 1.17–45.84). Conclusions Neither the PST nor GDT alone are useful screening tools for COVID-19. However, a diagnostic scale based on objective OD, GD, fever, and cough may help triage patients with suspected COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":245557,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of International Medical Research","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing for anosmia and ageusia in patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 in Saudi Arabia\",\"authors\":\"Osama Kentab, A. Ibrahim, Khaled R Soliman, Marzooqah Alanazi, Ahmed Alsunaid, Abdalmohsen Ababtain, Abdulaziz I Alresseeni, Abdulaziz Algarni, Khlalid Aljohani, Muna Aljahany\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03000605221096280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective This study investigated the role of objective olfactory dysfunction (OD) and gustatory dysfunction (GD) testing among patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who presented with respiratory symptoms. Methods A prospective, blinded, observational study was conducted in the emergency units of two tertiary hospitals. Participants were asked to identify scents in the pocket smell test (PST) and flavors in four different solutions in the gustatory dysfunction test (GDT). We assessed the level of agreement between objective findings and self-reported symptoms. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of chemosensory dysfunction for diagnosing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Results Of 250 participants, 74 (29.6%) were SARS-CoV-2-positive. There was slight agreement between self-reported symptoms and objective findings (kappa = 0.13 and 0.10 for OD and GD, respectively). OD assessed by the PST was independently associated with COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio = 1.89, 95% confidence interval, 1.04–3.46). This association was stronger when OD was combined with objective GD, cough, and fever (adjusted odds ratio = 7.33, 95% confidence interval, 1.17–45.84). Conclusions Neither the PST nor GDT alone are useful screening tools for COVID-19. However, a diagnostic scale based on objective OD, GD, fever, and cough may help triage patients with suspected COVID-19.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of International Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of International Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605221096280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605221096280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨客观嗅觉功能障碍(OD)和味觉功能障碍(GD)检测在疑似2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)呼吸道症状患者中的作用。方法在两所三级医院的急诊科进行前瞻性、盲法、观察性研究。参与者被要求在口袋气味测试(PST)中识别气味,在味觉功能障碍测试(GDT)中识别四种不同溶液中的味道。我们评估了客观结果和自我报告症状之间的一致程度。我们评估了化学感觉功能障碍诊断严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染的准确性。结果在250名参与者中,74人(29.6%)为sars - cov -2阳性。自我报告的症状和客观结果之间有轻微的一致(OD和GD的kappa分别为0.13和0.10)。PST评估的OD与COVID-19独立相关(校正优势比= 1.89,95%可信区间为1.04-3.46)。当OD与客观GD、咳嗽和发烧合并时,这种关联更强(调整后的优势比= 7.33,95%可信区间为1.17-45.84)。结论单独的PST和GDT都不是有用的COVID-19筛查工具。然而,基于客观OD、GD、发烧和咳嗽的诊断量表可能有助于对疑似COVID-19患者进行分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing for anosmia and ageusia in patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 in Saudi Arabia
Objective This study investigated the role of objective olfactory dysfunction (OD) and gustatory dysfunction (GD) testing among patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who presented with respiratory symptoms. Methods A prospective, blinded, observational study was conducted in the emergency units of two tertiary hospitals. Participants were asked to identify scents in the pocket smell test (PST) and flavors in four different solutions in the gustatory dysfunction test (GDT). We assessed the level of agreement between objective findings and self-reported symptoms. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of chemosensory dysfunction for diagnosing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Results Of 250 participants, 74 (29.6%) were SARS-CoV-2-positive. There was slight agreement between self-reported symptoms and objective findings (kappa = 0.13 and 0.10 for OD and GD, respectively). OD assessed by the PST was independently associated with COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio = 1.89, 95% confidence interval, 1.04–3.46). This association was stronger when OD was combined with objective GD, cough, and fever (adjusted odds ratio = 7.33, 95% confidence interval, 1.17–45.84). Conclusions Neither the PST nor GDT alone are useful screening tools for COVID-19. However, a diagnostic scale based on objective OD, GD, fever, and cough may help triage patients with suspected COVID-19.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Serological analysis of autoantibody mimicking anti-Rh(e) specificity: a case report Evaluation of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of the micropapillary component of stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Successful guselkumab treatment of a refractory psoriasis patient with Graves’ disease: a case report Deep learning in the radiologic diagnosis of osteoporosis: a literature review Assessing emerging causes of mitral regurgitation: atrial functional mitral regurgitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1