评估四个非洲国家电子卫生政策中的战略优先因素

Dillys Larbi, K. Anthun, F. Asah, O. Debrah, Konstantinos Antypas
{"title":"评估四个非洲国家电子卫生政策中的战略优先因素","authors":"Dillys Larbi, K. Anthun, F. Asah, O. Debrah, Konstantinos Antypas","doi":"10.23919/IST-Africa56635.2022.9845650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of electronic health systems is rapidly spreading in low-and middle-income countries (LLMICs). Empirical evidence shows that eHealth systems can improve access, quality, and equitable healthcare delivery, especially for the poor and vulnerable. Studies suggest that a lack of systems thinking leads to inadequate technical infrastructure, lack of interoperability, streamlining of patient-and health information sharing. This article assesses the BETTEReHEALTH strategic priority factors from four African countries: Ethiopia, Ghana, Malawi, and Tunisia. The primary data source was eHealth policies from the four countries. A document analysis was conducted, complemented by deductive, qualitative content analysis. The results show these countries have adopted and implemented eHealth policies. They have dedicated governing bodies that aim to strengthen the coordination of eHealth efforts. However, there is a need for more robust government support and regulation in creating a sustainable national eHealth environment.","PeriodicalId":142887,"journal":{"name":"2022 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Strategic Priority Factors in eHealth Policies of Four African Countries\",\"authors\":\"Dillys Larbi, K. Anthun, F. Asah, O. Debrah, Konstantinos Antypas\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/IST-Africa56635.2022.9845650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of electronic health systems is rapidly spreading in low-and middle-income countries (LLMICs). Empirical evidence shows that eHealth systems can improve access, quality, and equitable healthcare delivery, especially for the poor and vulnerable. Studies suggest that a lack of systems thinking leads to inadequate technical infrastructure, lack of interoperability, streamlining of patient-and health information sharing. This article assesses the BETTEReHEALTH strategic priority factors from four African countries: Ethiopia, Ghana, Malawi, and Tunisia. The primary data source was eHealth policies from the four countries. A document analysis was conducted, complemented by deductive, qualitative content analysis. The results show these countries have adopted and implemented eHealth policies. They have dedicated governing bodies that aim to strengthen the coordination of eHealth efforts. However, there is a need for more robust government support and regulation in creating a sustainable national eHealth environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/IST-Africa56635.2022.9845650\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/IST-Africa56635.2022.9845650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

电子卫生系统的使用正在低收入和中等收入国家迅速普及。经验证据表明,电子卫生系统可以改善可及性、质量和公平的卫生保健服务,特别是对穷人和弱势群体。研究表明,缺乏系统思维会导致技术基础设施不足,缺乏互操作性,以及患者和健康信息共享的流线型。本文评估了四个非洲国家(埃塞俄比亚、加纳、马拉维和突尼斯)的better - health战略优先因素。主要数据来源是这四个国家的电子保健政策。进行文献分析,辅以演绎定性内容分析。结果表明,这些国家已经采纳并实施了电子卫生政策。它们有专门的理事机构,旨在加强电子保健工作的协调。然而,在创造可持续的国家电子卫生环境方面,需要更强有力的政府支持和监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing Strategic Priority Factors in eHealth Policies of Four African Countries
The use of electronic health systems is rapidly spreading in low-and middle-income countries (LLMICs). Empirical evidence shows that eHealth systems can improve access, quality, and equitable healthcare delivery, especially for the poor and vulnerable. Studies suggest that a lack of systems thinking leads to inadequate technical infrastructure, lack of interoperability, streamlining of patient-and health information sharing. This article assesses the BETTEReHEALTH strategic priority factors from four African countries: Ethiopia, Ghana, Malawi, and Tunisia. The primary data source was eHealth policies from the four countries. A document analysis was conducted, complemented by deductive, qualitative content analysis. The results show these countries have adopted and implemented eHealth policies. They have dedicated governing bodies that aim to strengthen the coordination of eHealth efforts. However, there is a need for more robust government support and regulation in creating a sustainable national eHealth environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Smart City Maturity Assessment Model for South African Municipalities Design of a Tomato Harvesting Robot for Agricultural Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Case Study on Data Collection of Kreol Morisien, a Low-Resourced Creole Language The Development of a Livestock Farm Management Information System (LFMIS) Equitable Access to eLearning during Covid-19 Pandemic and beyond. A Comparative Analysis between Rural and Urban Schools in Zimbabwe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1