键盘上完成的乐谱:作曲家创造力的扩展

ACM '83 Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.1145/800173.809742
Alan D. Talbot
{"title":"键盘上完成的乐谱:作曲家创造力的扩展","authors":"Alan D. Talbot","doi":"10.1145/800173.809742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Music copying (the writing of musical scores) does not lend itself easily to automation. Like language, music notation has evolved over a long period of time, resulting in notational conventions which are complicated and often illogical. Many of the symbols required are quite elaborate, and some can vary in size and proportion. For a musician to be able to read the music quickly and correctly in a performance situation, the notation must follow a very precise set of aesthetic rules. For these reasons music is almost always hand copied, even today. Composers typically draw up their own scores and then send them to a copyist to have the parts extracted. The parts usually contain mistakes, and the scores are often not as legible as they should be. Furthermore, musicians often compose under extreme pressure, allowing little time for proofreading and revision. The following is a description of a computer system which offers an alternative to this expensive and time consuming process by automatically transcribing keyboard performances into legible musical scores.\n In designing an automated music printing system, a number of complex problems arise. The user should not be expected to be a computer expert. Input to such a system should be simple and natural and not require unusual skills. The system should be able to produce valid music with minimal user interaction, and therefore must handle unassisted many complex aspects of written music. For the system to do everything completely automatically would require artificial intelligence capabilities which could not be implemented in a small system affordable to the musician. Instead, comprehensive, flexible editing must be provided to allow the user to step in where the machine fails to copy correctly. Finally the system must provide quick, clean output on durable paper so that the music can be reproduced easily and will withstand the demands of stage performance.","PeriodicalId":306306,"journal":{"name":"ACM '83","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finished musical scores from the keyboard: An expansion of the composer's creativity\",\"authors\":\"Alan D. Talbot\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/800173.809742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Music copying (the writing of musical scores) does not lend itself easily to automation. Like language, music notation has evolved over a long period of time, resulting in notational conventions which are complicated and often illogical. Many of the symbols required are quite elaborate, and some can vary in size and proportion. For a musician to be able to read the music quickly and correctly in a performance situation, the notation must follow a very precise set of aesthetic rules. For these reasons music is almost always hand copied, even today. Composers typically draw up their own scores and then send them to a copyist to have the parts extracted. The parts usually contain mistakes, and the scores are often not as legible as they should be. Furthermore, musicians often compose under extreme pressure, allowing little time for proofreading and revision. The following is a description of a computer system which offers an alternative to this expensive and time consuming process by automatically transcribing keyboard performances into legible musical scores.\\n In designing an automated music printing system, a number of complex problems arise. The user should not be expected to be a computer expert. Input to such a system should be simple and natural and not require unusual skills. The system should be able to produce valid music with minimal user interaction, and therefore must handle unassisted many complex aspects of written music. For the system to do everything completely automatically would require artificial intelligence capabilities which could not be implemented in a small system affordable to the musician. Instead, comprehensive, flexible editing must be provided to allow the user to step in where the machine fails to copy correctly. Finally the system must provide quick, clean output on durable paper so that the music can be reproduced easily and will withstand the demands of stage performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM '83\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM '83\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/800173.809742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM '83","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/800173.809742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

音乐复制(乐谱的书写)不容易实现自动化。像语言一样,音乐记谱法也经历了很长一段时间的演变,导致了复杂且往往不合逻辑的记谱惯例。所需的许多符号都非常复杂,有些符号的大小和比例可能会有所不同。一个音乐家要想在演奏中快速准确地读懂乐谱,乐谱必须遵循一套非常精确的美学规则。由于这些原因,即使在今天,音乐几乎都是手工复制的。作曲家通常会自己写乐谱,然后把它们交给抄写员,让他们摘抄其中的部分。这些部分通常包含错误,而且分数通常不像他们应该的那样清晰。此外,音乐家经常在极端的压力下创作,几乎没有时间进行校对和修改。下面是对一种计算机系统的描述,该系统通过自动将键盘演奏转换成清晰的乐谱,为这种昂贵而耗时的过程提供了另一种选择。在设计自动音乐印刷系统时,会出现许多复杂的问题。不应期望用户是计算机专家。输入这样一个系统应该是简单和自然的,不需要不寻常的技能。该系统应该能够以最少的用户交互产生有效的音乐,因此必须处理书面音乐的许多复杂方面。要让系统完全自动地完成所有事情,就需要人工智能能力,而这在音乐家负担得起的小型系统中是无法实现的。相反,必须提供全面、灵活的编辑,以便在机器无法正确复制的地方允许用户介入。最后,系统必须在耐用的纸张上提供快速、干净的输出,这样音乐才能轻松再现,并能承受舞台表演的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Finished musical scores from the keyboard: An expansion of the composer's creativity
Music copying (the writing of musical scores) does not lend itself easily to automation. Like language, music notation has evolved over a long period of time, resulting in notational conventions which are complicated and often illogical. Many of the symbols required are quite elaborate, and some can vary in size and proportion. For a musician to be able to read the music quickly and correctly in a performance situation, the notation must follow a very precise set of aesthetic rules. For these reasons music is almost always hand copied, even today. Composers typically draw up their own scores and then send them to a copyist to have the parts extracted. The parts usually contain mistakes, and the scores are often not as legible as they should be. Furthermore, musicians often compose under extreme pressure, allowing little time for proofreading and revision. The following is a description of a computer system which offers an alternative to this expensive and time consuming process by automatically transcribing keyboard performances into legible musical scores. In designing an automated music printing system, a number of complex problems arise. The user should not be expected to be a computer expert. Input to such a system should be simple and natural and not require unusual skills. The system should be able to produce valid music with minimal user interaction, and therefore must handle unassisted many complex aspects of written music. For the system to do everything completely automatically would require artificial intelligence capabilities which could not be implemented in a small system affordable to the musician. Instead, comprehensive, flexible editing must be provided to allow the user to step in where the machine fails to copy correctly. Finally the system must provide quick, clean output on durable paper so that the music can be reproduced easily and will withstand the demands of stage performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optical storage of page images and pictorial data - opportunities and needed advances in information retrieval Office automation and the changing definition of the workplace Why Ada is not just another programming language Session M4: Women in the workplace Network protocol: A structured approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1