评估模型对中小企业组合预期信用损失(ECL)的影响

Saâd Benbachir, Mohamed Habachi
{"title":"评估模型对中小企业组合预期信用损失(ECL)的影响","authors":"Saâd Benbachir, Mohamed Habachi","doi":"10.13189/UJM.2018.061005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the impact of the internal modelling on the calculation of expected credit loss in the framework of the international standard IFRS 9. Indeed, the probability of default of counterparty depends on the model used for the conception of the internal rating system. The multitude of probabilistic models renders uncertain and imprecise, the calculation of the expected loss for the same SMEs portfolio of a Moroccan bank, as well as the comparison of losses over time due to the non-permanence of the rating system used. As a result, the regulator will be unable to guarantee an equitable and transparent system of provisioning of the losses because of the absence of standardization of the elaboration process of the rating tool. To show this risk associated with the multitude of models, this paper studied the impact of choice of the model on the expected credit loss, by calculating of the probability of default for several types of modelling based respectively on the pure logistic regression and the logistic regression on the principal components.","PeriodicalId":211193,"journal":{"name":"Universal journal of management","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Impact of Modelling on the Expected Credit Loss (ECL) of a Portfolio of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises\",\"authors\":\"Saâd Benbachir, Mohamed Habachi\",\"doi\":\"10.13189/UJM.2018.061005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper studies the impact of the internal modelling on the calculation of expected credit loss in the framework of the international standard IFRS 9. Indeed, the probability of default of counterparty depends on the model used for the conception of the internal rating system. The multitude of probabilistic models renders uncertain and imprecise, the calculation of the expected loss for the same SMEs portfolio of a Moroccan bank, as well as the comparison of losses over time due to the non-permanence of the rating system used. As a result, the regulator will be unable to guarantee an equitable and transparent system of provisioning of the losses because of the absence of standardization of the elaboration process of the rating tool. To show this risk associated with the multitude of models, this paper studied the impact of choice of the model on the expected credit loss, by calculating of the probability of default for several types of modelling based respectively on the pure logistic regression and the logistic regression on the principal components.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universal journal of management\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universal journal of management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13189/UJM.2018.061005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universal journal of management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13189/UJM.2018.061005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文研究了国际会计准则IFRS 9框架下内部建模对预期信用损失计算的影响。实际上,交易对手违约的概率取决于内部评级系统概念所使用的模型。大量的概率模型使得摩洛哥银行同一中小企业投资组合的预期损失计算不确定和不精确,以及由于所使用的评级系统的非永久性而导致的损失随时间的比较。因此,由于评级工具的制定过程缺乏标准化,监管机构将无法保证一个公平和透明的损失准备体系。为了显示这种风险与众多模型相关,本文通过分别基于纯逻辑回归和主成分逻辑回归计算几种模型的违约概率,研究了模型选择对预期信用损失的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the Impact of Modelling on the Expected Credit Loss (ECL) of a Portfolio of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises
This paper studies the impact of the internal modelling on the calculation of expected credit loss in the framework of the international standard IFRS 9. Indeed, the probability of default of counterparty depends on the model used for the conception of the internal rating system. The multitude of probabilistic models renders uncertain and imprecise, the calculation of the expected loss for the same SMEs portfolio of a Moroccan bank, as well as the comparison of losses over time due to the non-permanence of the rating system used. As a result, the regulator will be unable to guarantee an equitable and transparent system of provisioning of the losses because of the absence of standardization of the elaboration process of the rating tool. To show this risk associated with the multitude of models, this paper studied the impact of choice of the model on the expected credit loss, by calculating of the probability of default for several types of modelling based respectively on the pure logistic regression and the logistic regression on the principal components.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Quality Management Practices on Operational and Financial Performance The Link between Organizational Culture and Mental Health of Employees in Higher Education Institutions during COVID-19 Relationship between Onboarding Process and Employee Engagement in the Pharmaceutical Industry in North Macedonia What Drives Creativity in the Workplace? Exchange and Contextual Variables in Their Relationship to Supervisor and Self-Report Creativity The Demographic Profile of School Principals in Greece in Relation to Their Personality and Authentic Leadership
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1