外判安排的策略性操作

A. Plugge, Mark Borman, M. Janssen
{"title":"外判安排的策略性操作","authors":"A. Plugge, Mark Borman, M. Janssen","doi":"10.1108/SO-12-2015-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nAdaptation is often seen as a key competitive advantage for outsourcing vendors. Outsourcing research has often assumed that vendor capabilities are static. However, as a result of uncertainties and/or changes in the client environment, vendors need to be able to adapt their outsourcing capabilities. The aim of our research is to compare two contrasting outsourcing approaches and illustrate how an adaptive approach may deliver better results for clients in the long term. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nThe paper uses a combination of literature and case study research. A retrospective case study approach was adopted, using interviews, observations and analysis of reports. Two case studies utilizing contrasting clients approaches were investigated and compared. In one of the case studies, the client reorganized activities first and then outsourced them, while in the other, the client did the reverse – outsourced first and then reorganized. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThe findings indicate that reorganizing first and outsourcing afterwards contributes to a more controlled implementation, which results in a more defined and stable set of vendor outsourcing capabilities that contributed to short-term success. In contrast, outsourcing first and reorganizing later demonstrates a less controlled redesign of the client’s organizational structure, which requires a malleable set of outsourcing capabilities to accommodate future change. The latter strategic manoeuver results in an extended adaptation period, as some capabilities need to be developed over time. However, it may improve success over time as subsequent changes in the client environment can be catered for in a better way. \n \n \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \n \n \n \n \nOnly two explorative case studies were performed, limiting confidence in the degree of generalization of the results. We plea for more research on the effect of context dependency as various contingencies may impact the adaptation of outsourcing capabilities; for example, the volatility of the client’s market or the stability of the technology concerned. \n \n \n \n \nPractical implications \n \n \n \n \nWhen a client applies a proactive manoeuver, reorganizing first and then applying outsourcing, the number of adaptive capabilities required of the outsourcing vendor is reduced, limiting the risk for the client in the short term. In the longer term, however, subsequent change requirements may be less well-accommodated. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nStrategic manoeuvers within an outsourcing context have received limited attention in research. As far as we know, this is the first empirical research that investigates the benefits of vendors having adaptive capability.","PeriodicalId":319712,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic manoeuvers in outsourcing arrangements\",\"authors\":\"A. Plugge, Mark Borman, M. Janssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/SO-12-2015-0031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nAdaptation is often seen as a key competitive advantage for outsourcing vendors. Outsourcing research has often assumed that vendor capabilities are static. However, as a result of uncertainties and/or changes in the client environment, vendors need to be able to adapt their outsourcing capabilities. The aim of our research is to compare two contrasting outsourcing approaches and illustrate how an adaptive approach may deliver better results for clients in the long term. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nDesign/methodology/approach \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe paper uses a combination of literature and case study research. A retrospective case study approach was adopted, using interviews, observations and analysis of reports. Two case studies utilizing contrasting clients approaches were investigated and compared. In one of the case studies, the client reorganized activities first and then outsourced them, while in the other, the client did the reverse – outsourced first and then reorganized. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nFindings \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe findings indicate that reorganizing first and outsourcing afterwards contributes to a more controlled implementation, which results in a more defined and stable set of vendor outsourcing capabilities that contributed to short-term success. In contrast, outsourcing first and reorganizing later demonstrates a less controlled redesign of the client’s organizational structure, which requires a malleable set of outsourcing capabilities to accommodate future change. The latter strategic manoeuver results in an extended adaptation period, as some capabilities need to be developed over time. However, it may improve success over time as subsequent changes in the client environment can be catered for in a better way. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nResearch limitations/implications \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nOnly two explorative case studies were performed, limiting confidence in the degree of generalization of the results. We plea for more research on the effect of context dependency as various contingencies may impact the adaptation of outsourcing capabilities; for example, the volatility of the client’s market or the stability of the technology concerned. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nPractical implications \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nWhen a client applies a proactive manoeuver, reorganizing first and then applying outsourcing, the number of adaptive capabilities required of the outsourcing vendor is reduced, limiting the risk for the client in the short term. In the longer term, however, subsequent change requirements may be less well-accommodated. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nOriginality/value \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nStrategic manoeuvers within an outsourcing context have received limited attention in research. As far as we know, this is the first empirical research that investigates the benefits of vendors having adaptive capability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":319712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/SO-12-2015-0031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/SO-12-2015-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

适应性通常被视为外包供应商的关键竞争优势。外包研究通常假设供应商的能力是静态的。然而,由于客户环境的不确定性和/或变化,供应商需要能够调整其外包能力。我们研究的目的是比较两种截然不同的外包方法,并说明适应性方法如何在长期内为客户提供更好的结果。这篇论文采用了文献和案例研究相结合的方法。采用了回顾性案例研究方法,利用访谈、观察和分析报告。两个案例研究利用不同的客户方法进行了调查和比较。在其中一个案例研究中,客户首先重组活动,然后将其外包,而在另一个案例研究中,客户则相反——先外包,然后重组。研究结果表明,先重组后外包有助于更可控的实施,从而形成一套更明确、更稳定的供应商外包能力,有助于短期成功。相比之下,先外包后重组展示了对客户组织结构的不太受控制的重新设计,这需要一组可扩展的外包能力来适应未来的变化。后一种战略操作导致了较长的适应期,因为有些能力需要随着时间的推移而发展。但是,随着时间的推移,它可能会提高成功程度,因为可以以更好的方式满足客户机环境的后续更改。研究局限/启示仅进行了两个探索性案例研究,限制了对结果推广程度的信心。我们呼吁对上下文依赖的影响进行更多的研究,因为各种突发事件可能会影响外包能力的适应;例如,客户市场的波动性或相关技术的稳定性。当客户采用主动策略,首先重组,然后应用外包时,外包供应商所需的自适应能力的数量就会减少,从而在短期内限制了客户的风险。然而,从长期来看,后续的变更需求可能不太容易适应。原创性/价值外包环境中的战略操作在研究中受到的关注有限。据我们所知,这是第一个调查具有自适应能力的供应商的好处的实证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Strategic manoeuvers in outsourcing arrangements
Purpose Adaptation is often seen as a key competitive advantage for outsourcing vendors. Outsourcing research has often assumed that vendor capabilities are static. However, as a result of uncertainties and/or changes in the client environment, vendors need to be able to adapt their outsourcing capabilities. The aim of our research is to compare two contrasting outsourcing approaches and illustrate how an adaptive approach may deliver better results for clients in the long term. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses a combination of literature and case study research. A retrospective case study approach was adopted, using interviews, observations and analysis of reports. Two case studies utilizing contrasting clients approaches were investigated and compared. In one of the case studies, the client reorganized activities first and then outsourced them, while in the other, the client did the reverse – outsourced first and then reorganized. Findings The findings indicate that reorganizing first and outsourcing afterwards contributes to a more controlled implementation, which results in a more defined and stable set of vendor outsourcing capabilities that contributed to short-term success. In contrast, outsourcing first and reorganizing later demonstrates a less controlled redesign of the client’s organizational structure, which requires a malleable set of outsourcing capabilities to accommodate future change. The latter strategic manoeuver results in an extended adaptation period, as some capabilities need to be developed over time. However, it may improve success over time as subsequent changes in the client environment can be catered for in a better way. Research limitations/implications Only two explorative case studies were performed, limiting confidence in the degree of generalization of the results. We plea for more research on the effect of context dependency as various contingencies may impact the adaptation of outsourcing capabilities; for example, the volatility of the client’s market or the stability of the technology concerned. Practical implications When a client applies a proactive manoeuver, reorganizing first and then applying outsourcing, the number of adaptive capabilities required of the outsourcing vendor is reduced, limiting the risk for the client in the short term. In the longer term, however, subsequent change requirements may be less well-accommodated. Originality/value Strategic manoeuvers within an outsourcing context have received limited attention in research. As far as we know, this is the first empirical research that investigates the benefits of vendors having adaptive capability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determinants of ICT outsourcing among the locally-owned manufacturers in Malaysia ISO 37500 – Comparing outsourcing life-cycle models An exploratory study on the impact of recruitment process outsourcing on employer branding of an organisation Local industry technological capability development using outsourcing opportunities Servitization in contract manufacturing – evidence from Polar business cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1