国际私法中的礼让与正义的基本原则

James J. Edelman, Madeleine Salinger
{"title":"国际私法中的礼让与正义的基本原则","authors":"James J. Edelman, Madeleine Salinger","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198868958.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay considers the underlying rationale for the principle of comity in private international law. It explains the meaning and operation of a widely accepted limit to the principle which applies when comity runs contrary to fundamental principles of justice, by drawing on insights provided by Adrian Briggs in his lectures on comity to the Hague Academy of International Law. The essay uses the principle of privacy as a case study to assess whether new fundamental principles of justice might arise and, if so, how they might be recognised.","PeriodicalId":333808,"journal":{"name":"A Conflict Of Laws Companion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comity in Private International Law and Fundamental Principles of Justice\",\"authors\":\"James J. Edelman, Madeleine Salinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198868958.003.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay considers the underlying rationale for the principle of comity in private international law. It explains the meaning and operation of a widely accepted limit to the principle which applies when comity runs contrary to fundamental principles of justice, by drawing on insights provided by Adrian Briggs in his lectures on comity to the Hague Academy of International Law. The essay uses the principle of privacy as a case study to assess whether new fundamental principles of justice might arise and, if so, how they might be recognised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A Conflict Of Laws Companion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A Conflict Of Laws Companion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198868958.003.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A Conflict Of Laws Companion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198868958.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了国际私法中礼让原则的基本原理。通过借鉴阿德里安·布里格斯(Adrian Briggs)在海牙国际法学院(Hague Academy of International Law)关于礼让的讲座中提供的见解,解释了在礼让与正义的基本原则相违背时,适用于礼让的原则的广泛接受的限制的含义和操作。本文以隐私原则为个案研究,评估是否可能出现新的基本正义原则,如果出现,它们将如何得到认可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comity in Private International Law and Fundamental Principles of Justice
This essay considers the underlying rationale for the principle of comity in private international law. It explains the meaning and operation of a widely accepted limit to the principle which applies when comity runs contrary to fundamental principles of justice, by drawing on insights provided by Adrian Briggs in his lectures on comity to the Hague Academy of International Law. The essay uses the principle of privacy as a case study to assess whether new fundamental principles of justice might arise and, if so, how they might be recognised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Distant Shore: Discretion and the Extent of Judicial Jurisdiction Taming Anti-suit Injunctions Comity in Private International Law and Fundamental Principles of Justice Forum Non Conveniens: Now We Are Much More Than Ten The Conflict of Laws and Unjust Enrichment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1