反美政府采购/服务合同成就

Chrestella Chrestella
{"title":"反美政府采购/服务合同成就","authors":"Chrestella Chrestella","doi":"10.35334/AY.V5I2.1911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Government goods/services is never free from contracts. The contract is the basis of every action / achievement carried out both by the Government as the user of the goods / services and the Provider as the provider of the goods / services. In the process of running a contract is very prone to conflict / dispute between the parties. On average, contract conflicts up to contract disputes take place after the contract expires so that they can be carried out through courts or alternative dispute resolution institutions stipulated in the law. However, teh main point is this study is the contract conflict that has not been a contract dispute because the contract has not ended (the periode of contract execution) or the contract has not started (pre-contract). Can it be called a default if the contract has not been completed and there are parties who want to cancel the contract? Do the principles of goodfaith and balance apply to contracts where one of the parties is the government?Based on this, the following matters will be examined: 1) The principle of good faith in the government through contract repudiation to prevent breach of contract; 2) The principle of balance in the implementation of contract repudiation of government goods/service procurement. The research method used a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. From the results of the study, it was concluded that in the case of the Government with the principle of good faith and proportional balance of contracts through Repudiation efforts trying to prevent harmful things such as defaults when the Government considers that the contract cannot be continued. The value of good faith as the most fundamental basis coupled with balance values in accordance with its portion or the so-called proportional principle must really be the most serious concern in making contracts not only to safeguard the rights and obligations of the parties but more importantly to achieve the purpose of the contract that is the fulfillment of government goods / services.  Keywords : Repudiation, governement, contract, good faith, proportional.","PeriodicalId":322454,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"REPUDIASI DALAM PEMENUHAN PRESTASI KONTRAK PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH\",\"authors\":\"Chrestella Chrestella\",\"doi\":\"10.35334/AY.V5I2.1911\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Government goods/services is never free from contracts. The contract is the basis of every action / achievement carried out both by the Government as the user of the goods / services and the Provider as the provider of the goods / services. In the process of running a contract is very prone to conflict / dispute between the parties. On average, contract conflicts up to contract disputes take place after the contract expires so that they can be carried out through courts or alternative dispute resolution institutions stipulated in the law. However, teh main point is this study is the contract conflict that has not been a contract dispute because the contract has not ended (the periode of contract execution) or the contract has not started (pre-contract). Can it be called a default if the contract has not been completed and there are parties who want to cancel the contract? Do the principles of goodfaith and balance apply to contracts where one of the parties is the government?Based on this, the following matters will be examined: 1) The principle of good faith in the government through contract repudiation to prevent breach of contract; 2) The principle of balance in the implementation of contract repudiation of government goods/service procurement. The research method used a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. From the results of the study, it was concluded that in the case of the Government with the principle of good faith and proportional balance of contracts through Repudiation efforts trying to prevent harmful things such as defaults when the Government considers that the contract cannot be continued. The value of good faith as the most fundamental basis coupled with balance values in accordance with its portion or the so-called proportional principle must really be the most serious concern in making contracts not only to safeguard the rights and obligations of the parties but more importantly to achieve the purpose of the contract that is the fulfillment of government goods / services.  Keywords : Repudiation, governement, contract, good faith, proportional.\",\"PeriodicalId\":322454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35334/AY.V5I2.1911\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35334/AY.V5I2.1911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

政府的商品/服务永远离不开契约。合约是作为货品/服务使用者的政府和作为货品/服务提供者的供应商所采取的每项行动/成就的基础。在执行合同的过程中,双方之间很容易发生冲突/纠纷。一般来说,合同冲突直至合同纠纷都是在合同期满后发生的,可以通过法院或法律规定的替代性纠纷解决机构来解决。然而,本研究的主要观点是,由于合同尚未结束(合同执行期间)或合同尚未开始(合同前),合同冲突尚未成为合同纠纷。如果合同没有完成,并且有当事人想要取消合同,这可以被称为违约吗?诚信与平衡原则是否适用于一方为政府的合同?在此基础上,本文将探讨以下问题:1)诚信原则在政府中通过违约来防止违约;2)政府货物/服务采购合同拒付实施中的平衡原则。研究方法采用了规范性的法律方法,并结合了成文法和概念性方法。从研究结果来看,得出的结论是,在政府以诚信原则和比例平衡原则订立合同的情况下,通过拒付努力试图防止违约等有害的事情发生,当政府认为合同不能继续时。诚信价值作为最根本的基础,再加上按比例分配的平衡价值或所谓的比例原则,在订立合同时,不仅要维护当事人的权利和义务,更重要的是要实现合同的目的,即履行政府的货物/服务,这必须是最严重的问题。关键词:拒付,政府,合同,诚信,比例
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
REPUDIASI DALAM PEMENUHAN PRESTASI KONTRAK PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH
Abstract Government goods/services is never free from contracts. The contract is the basis of every action / achievement carried out both by the Government as the user of the goods / services and the Provider as the provider of the goods / services. In the process of running a contract is very prone to conflict / dispute between the parties. On average, contract conflicts up to contract disputes take place after the contract expires so that they can be carried out through courts or alternative dispute resolution institutions stipulated in the law. However, teh main point is this study is the contract conflict that has not been a contract dispute because the contract has not ended (the periode of contract execution) or the contract has not started (pre-contract). Can it be called a default if the contract has not been completed and there are parties who want to cancel the contract? Do the principles of goodfaith and balance apply to contracts where one of the parties is the government?Based on this, the following matters will be examined: 1) The principle of good faith in the government through contract repudiation to prevent breach of contract; 2) The principle of balance in the implementation of contract repudiation of government goods/service procurement. The research method used a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. From the results of the study, it was concluded that in the case of the Government with the principle of good faith and proportional balance of contracts through Repudiation efforts trying to prevent harmful things such as defaults when the Government considers that the contract cannot be continued. The value of good faith as the most fundamental basis coupled with balance values in accordance with its portion or the so-called proportional principle must really be the most serious concern in making contracts not only to safeguard the rights and obligations of the parties but more importantly to achieve the purpose of the contract that is the fulfillment of government goods / services.  Keywords : Repudiation, governement, contract, good faith, proportional.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EKSISTENSI PERJANJIAN ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM HUKUM ACARA PERDATA PENGAWASAN OMBUDSMAN TERHADAP PENYELENGGARAAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK PADA MASA PANDEMI CORONA VIRUS DISEASE 2019 (COVID-19) TANGGUNGJAWAB HUKUM USAHA KLINIK KESEHATAN DI KOTA TARAKAN TERHADAP SEGALA RESIKO USAHA BENTUK KETERBUKAAN RAHASIA MEDIS DALAM SITUASI PANDEMI VIRUS COVID 19 DI INDONESIA ASPEK HUKUM LABORATORIUM FORENSIK KEIMIGRASIAN: STUDI KASUS PEMERIKSAAN PASPOR PALSU KEBANGSAAN INGGRIS ATAS NAMA ABBAS TAUQEER
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1