AHP与SAW相结合的旅游目的地决策支持系统

P. Ciptayani, N. Saptarini, P. A. W. Santiary, I. Astawa
{"title":"AHP与SAW相结合的旅游目的地决策支持系统","authors":"P. Ciptayani, N. Saptarini, P. A. W. Santiary, I. Astawa","doi":"10.1109/EIConCIT.2018.8878638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traveling is one of the popular activities today. When traveling, the tourist usually decides to visit the interesting tourism destination. The number of tourist destinations available, often makes the tourist confused to select the destination according to their preferences. This paper aims to demonstrate multi criteria decision making (MCDM) by combining Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). The standard SAW method uses the criteria weight input by user. Users are often confused to give the score that represent their preference for the criteria appropriately. In this study, the AHP was used to get the weight of criteria based on user’ priority, while the SAW was used to rank all the alternatives. The case study used four criteria and ten alternatives. The result shows that combining AHP and SAW can be applied to the case study. The combining method work well by result the criteria weight based on the user preference and then rank all alternatives based on the alternatives score in each criterion and the weight of each criterion. The case study show that value of consistency ratio was 0.043, which means the comparison matrix inputted by user, was consistent.","PeriodicalId":424909,"journal":{"name":"2018 2nd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision Support System for Tourist Destination using the Combination of AHP and SAW\",\"authors\":\"P. Ciptayani, N. Saptarini, P. A. W. Santiary, I. Astawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EIConCIT.2018.8878638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traveling is one of the popular activities today. When traveling, the tourist usually decides to visit the interesting tourism destination. The number of tourist destinations available, often makes the tourist confused to select the destination according to their preferences. This paper aims to demonstrate multi criteria decision making (MCDM) by combining Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). The standard SAW method uses the criteria weight input by user. Users are often confused to give the score that represent their preference for the criteria appropriately. In this study, the AHP was used to get the weight of criteria based on user’ priority, while the SAW was used to rank all the alternatives. The case study used four criteria and ten alternatives. The result shows that combining AHP and SAW can be applied to the case study. The combining method work well by result the criteria weight based on the user preference and then rank all alternatives based on the alternatives score in each criterion and the weight of each criterion. The case study show that value of consistency ratio was 0.043, which means the comparison matrix inputted by user, was consistent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 2nd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 2nd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EIConCIT.2018.8878638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 2nd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EIConCIT.2018.8878638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

旅游是当今流行的活动之一。旅游时,游客通常决定参观有趣的旅游目的地。旅游目的地的数量之多,往往使游客根据自己的喜好选择目的地感到困惑。本文将层次分析法(AHP)和简单加性加权法(SAW)相结合,对多准则决策(MCDM)进行了研究。标准SAW方法使用用户输入的标准权重。用户通常会感到困惑,无法给出适当地代表他们对标准偏好的分数。在本研究中,采用AHP法根据用户的优先级来确定标准的权重,而采用SAW法对所有备选方案进行排序。该案例研究使用了四个标准和十个备选方案。结果表明,AHP和SAW相结合的方法可以应用于案例分析。该组合方法根据用户偏好确定各指标的权重,然后根据各指标的得分和各指标的权重对各指标进行排序,效果较好。案例分析表明,一致性比为0.043,说明用户输入的比较矩阵是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decision Support System for Tourist Destination using the Combination of AHP and SAW
Traveling is one of the popular activities today. When traveling, the tourist usually decides to visit the interesting tourism destination. The number of tourist destinations available, often makes the tourist confused to select the destination according to their preferences. This paper aims to demonstrate multi criteria decision making (MCDM) by combining Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weighting (SAW). The standard SAW method uses the criteria weight input by user. Users are often confused to give the score that represent their preference for the criteria appropriately. In this study, the AHP was used to get the weight of criteria based on user’ priority, while the SAW was used to rank all the alternatives. The case study used four criteria and ten alternatives. The result shows that combining AHP and SAW can be applied to the case study. The combining method work well by result the criteria weight based on the user preference and then rank all alternatives based on the alternatives score in each criterion and the weight of each criterion. The case study show that value of consistency ratio was 0.043, which means the comparison matrix inputted by user, was consistent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Experimental Study on Zoning, Histogram, and Structural Methods to Classify Sundanese Characters from Handwriting Medicine Stock Forecasting Using Least Square Method Sentiment Analysis of Product Reviews using Naive Bayes Algorithm: A Case Study [EIConCIT 2018 Cover Page] Keynote Speech 3 Internet of Things (IoT) Technology For Star Fruit Plantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1