对漏洞扫描器进行基准测试:对SCADA设备和科学仪器的实验

Malaka El, Emma McMahon, S. Samtani, Mark W. Patton, Hsinchun Chen
{"title":"对漏洞扫描器进行基准测试:对SCADA设备和科学仪器的实验","authors":"Malaka El, Emma McMahon, S. Samtani, Mark W. Patton, Hsinchun Chen","doi":"10.1109/ISI.2017.8004879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cybersecurity is a critical concern in society today. One common avenue of attack for malicious hackers is exploiting vulnerable websites. It is estimated that there are over one million websites that are attacked daily. Two emerging targets of such attacks are Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) devices and scientific instruments. Vulnerability assessment tools can help provide owners of these devices with the knowledge on how to protect their infrastructure. However, owners face difficulties in identifying which tools are ideal for their assessments. This research aims to benchmark two state-of-the-art vulnerability assessment tools, Nessus and Burp Suite, in the context of SCADA devices and scientific instruments. We specifically focus on identifying the accuracy, scalability, and vulnerability results of the scans. Results of our study indicate that both tools together can provide a comprehensive assessment of the vulnerabilities in SCADA devices and scientific instruments.","PeriodicalId":423696,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking vulnerability scanners: An experiment on SCADA devices and scientific instruments\",\"authors\":\"Malaka El, Emma McMahon, S. Samtani, Mark W. Patton, Hsinchun Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISI.2017.8004879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cybersecurity is a critical concern in society today. One common avenue of attack for malicious hackers is exploiting vulnerable websites. It is estimated that there are over one million websites that are attacked daily. Two emerging targets of such attacks are Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) devices and scientific instruments. Vulnerability assessment tools can help provide owners of these devices with the knowledge on how to protect their infrastructure. However, owners face difficulties in identifying which tools are ideal for their assessments. This research aims to benchmark two state-of-the-art vulnerability assessment tools, Nessus and Burp Suite, in the context of SCADA devices and scientific instruments. We specifically focus on identifying the accuracy, scalability, and vulnerability results of the scans. Results of our study indicate that both tools together can provide a comprehensive assessment of the vulnerabilities in SCADA devices and scientific instruments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI)\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISI.2017.8004879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISI.2017.8004879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

网络安全是当今社会的一个关键问题。恶意黑客攻击的一个常见途径是利用易受攻击的网站。据估计,每天有超过一百万个网站受到攻击。这类攻击的两个新目标是监控和数据采集(SCADA)设备和科学仪器。漏洞评估工具可以帮助这些设备的所有者了解如何保护其基础设施。然而,所有者在确定哪些工具对他们的评估是理想的方面面临困难。本研究旨在对两种最先进的漏洞评估工具Nessus和Burp Suite在SCADA设备和科学仪器的背景下进行基准测试。我们特别关注识别扫描的准确性、可伸缩性和漏洞结果。我们的研究结果表明,这两种工具可以共同提供SCADA设备和科学仪器漏洞的综合评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benchmarking vulnerability scanners: An experiment on SCADA devices and scientific instruments
Cybersecurity is a critical concern in society today. One common avenue of attack for malicious hackers is exploiting vulnerable websites. It is estimated that there are over one million websites that are attacked daily. Two emerging targets of such attacks are Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) devices and scientific instruments. Vulnerability assessment tools can help provide owners of these devices with the knowledge on how to protect their infrastructure. However, owners face difficulties in identifying which tools are ideal for their assessments. This research aims to benchmark two state-of-the-art vulnerability assessment tools, Nessus and Burp Suite, in the context of SCADA devices and scientific instruments. We specifically focus on identifying the accuracy, scalability, and vulnerability results of the scans. Results of our study indicate that both tools together can provide a comprehensive assessment of the vulnerabilities in SCADA devices and scientific instruments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The dynamics of health sentiments with competitive interactions in social media Phishing detection: A recent intelligent machine learning comparison based on models content and features A framework for digital forensics analysis based on semantic role labeling Alignment-free indexing-first-one hashing with bloom filter integration Assessing medical device vulnerabilities on the Internet of Things
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1