关于滥用市场力量的法律的现代化:联邦经济事务和能源部的报告(德国)

H. Schweitzer, Justus Haucap, Wolfgang Kerber, Robert Welker
{"title":"关于滥用市场力量的法律的现代化:联邦经济事务和能源部的报告(德国)","authors":"H. Schweitzer, Justus Haucap, Wolfgang Kerber, Robert Welker","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3250742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digitization has transformed – and continues to transform – the economy. Among the characteristic features of digitization are the increasing importance of (a) data as a critical input resource in production and distribution processes and of (b) digital platforms as new players in the markets. The changes in the structure of markets – some of which have become highly concentrated – and in business strategies raise the question whether EU competition law and German competition law are able to deal with the new challenges of the digital economy. Our report for the German Economic Ministry looks at whether a modernization of the (European and German) rules on the abuse of market power is needed. For this purpose, we look at Article 102 TFEU and their (rough) equivalents in German competition law, namely in §§ 18, 19 GWB. In addition, we pay particular attention to the question of whether § 20 GWB – a specificity of German competition law which prohibits exclusionary abuses of relative market power (§ 20 para. 1 – “economic dependence”) and superior market power vis-a-vis small and medium sized competitors (§ 20 para. 3) – can become an effective instrument for closing persisting gaps in controlling abusive behaviour in view of the special challenges facing the digital economy.","PeriodicalId":121229,"journal":{"name":"European Public Law: National eJournal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modernising the Law on Abuse of Market Power: Report for the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (Germany)\",\"authors\":\"H. Schweitzer, Justus Haucap, Wolfgang Kerber, Robert Welker\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3250742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digitization has transformed – and continues to transform – the economy. Among the characteristic features of digitization are the increasing importance of (a) data as a critical input resource in production and distribution processes and of (b) digital platforms as new players in the markets. The changes in the structure of markets – some of which have become highly concentrated – and in business strategies raise the question whether EU competition law and German competition law are able to deal with the new challenges of the digital economy. Our report for the German Economic Ministry looks at whether a modernization of the (European and German) rules on the abuse of market power is needed. For this purpose, we look at Article 102 TFEU and their (rough) equivalents in German competition law, namely in §§ 18, 19 GWB. In addition, we pay particular attention to the question of whether § 20 GWB – a specificity of German competition law which prohibits exclusionary abuses of relative market power (§ 20 para. 1 – “economic dependence”) and superior market power vis-a-vis small and medium sized competitors (§ 20 para. 3) – can become an effective instrument for closing persisting gaps in controlling abusive behaviour in view of the special challenges facing the digital economy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":121229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Public Law: National eJournal\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Public Law: National eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3250742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Public Law: National eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3250742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

数字化已经并将继续改变经济。数字化的特征包括(a)数据作为生产和分销过程中的关键输入资源的重要性日益增加,以及(b)数字平台作为市场中的新参与者的重要性日益增加。市场结构(其中一些已经高度集中)和商业战略的变化,引发了一个问题:欧盟竞争法和德国竞争法是否能够应对数字经济的新挑战?我们为德国经济部撰写的报告着眼于是否需要对(欧洲和德国)滥用市场力量的规则进行现代化改革。为此,我们看看第102条TFEU及其在德国竞争法中的(大致)对等物,即§§18,19 GWB。此外,我们特别关注的问题是,第20条GWB——德国竞争法禁止排他性滥用相对市场力量的具体规定(第20段)。1 -“经济依赖”)和相对于中小型竞争者的优越市场力量(第20段)。3) -鉴于数码经济所面临的特殊挑战,可成为一项有效工具,以缩小在控制滥用行为方面的持续差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modernising the Law on Abuse of Market Power: Report for the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (Germany)
Digitization has transformed – and continues to transform – the economy. Among the characteristic features of digitization are the increasing importance of (a) data as a critical input resource in production and distribution processes and of (b) digital platforms as new players in the markets. The changes in the structure of markets – some of which have become highly concentrated – and in business strategies raise the question whether EU competition law and German competition law are able to deal with the new challenges of the digital economy. Our report for the German Economic Ministry looks at whether a modernization of the (European and German) rules on the abuse of market power is needed. For this purpose, we look at Article 102 TFEU and their (rough) equivalents in German competition law, namely in §§ 18, 19 GWB. In addition, we pay particular attention to the question of whether § 20 GWB – a specificity of German competition law which prohibits exclusionary abuses of relative market power (§ 20 para. 1 – “economic dependence”) and superior market power vis-a-vis small and medium sized competitors (§ 20 para. 3) – can become an effective instrument for closing persisting gaps in controlling abusive behaviour in view of the special challenges facing the digital economy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Smart Metering Interoperability Issues and Solutions: Taking Inspiration from Other Ecosystems and Sectors COVID-19 Vaccination and Data Protection Issues: A European Comparative Study With Focuses on France, Germany, Belgium, and Switzerland Costituzionalismo e diversità etnica: il caso della Bosnia-Erzegovina (Constitutionalism and Ethnic Diversity: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina) Judicial Assistants in Europe – A Comparative Analysis Connected Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1