{"title":"史密斯的“热”:阿尔弗雷德·e·史密斯和“天主教”问题","authors":"Benjamin Voth","doi":"10.1080/10417949409372952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay explores Alfred E. Smith's 1928 apologetic address delivered in response to arguments that a Catholic should not be president. This analysis indicates that Smith's speech failed for three reasons: 1) a lack of audience identification, 2) a failure to create an apologetic interface with the charges made, and 3) an over reliance on kategoria as an apologetic means. Smith's failure is useful to further understanding of John F. Kennedy's success in 1960 on the same issue.","PeriodicalId":212800,"journal":{"name":"Southern Journal of Communication","volume":"3 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Smith ‘heat’: Alfred E. Smith and the “catholic” issue\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Voth\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10417949409372952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay explores Alfred E. Smith's 1928 apologetic address delivered in response to arguments that a Catholic should not be president. This analysis indicates that Smith's speech failed for three reasons: 1) a lack of audience identification, 2) a failure to create an apologetic interface with the charges made, and 3) an over reliance on kategoria as an apologetic means. Smith's failure is useful to further understanding of John F. Kennedy's success in 1960 on the same issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"3 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949409372952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417949409372952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Smith ‘heat’: Alfred E. Smith and the “catholic” issue
This essay explores Alfred E. Smith's 1928 apologetic address delivered in response to arguments that a Catholic should not be president. This analysis indicates that Smith's speech failed for three reasons: 1) a lack of audience identification, 2) a failure to create an apologetic interface with the charges made, and 3) an over reliance on kategoria as an apologetic means. Smith's failure is useful to further understanding of John F. Kennedy's success in 1960 on the same issue.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
