{"title":"影响大学生对转基因食品认识和看法的因素","authors":"C. Laux, G. Mosher, S. Freeman","doi":"10.21061/jots.v36i2.a.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of biotechnology in food and agricultural applications has increased greatly during the past decade and is considered by many to be a controversial topic. Drawing upon a previous national study, a new survey was conducted of U.S. and international college students at a large, land-grant, Research University to determine factors that may affect opinions about genetically modified (GM) food products. Factors examined included nationality, discipline area of study, perceptions of safety, and awareness and levels of acceptance regarding GM food. Results indicated students born outside the United States had more negative opinions about genetically modified foods than did Americanborn students. Students who were studying a physical science-based curriculum had a more positive opinion of GM food than did students studying a curriculum that was not based in the physical science. In addition, students who reported a higher level of acceptance of genetically modified foods felt more positively about the safety of the technology. Introduction The use of biotechnology in food and agriculture has increased greatly during the past decade (Comstock, 2001; Knight, 2006). Global use of genetically modified (GM) plants has increased rapidly since their commercial introduction in 1996. Desirable traits (e.g., insect and herbicide resistance and improved nutritional content) have resulted in a large increase in the number of hectares planted globally. The prevalence of GM crops has increased every year since their introduction, and this will continue (James, 2008). Consumer opinions are important to the success of technological innovation in the marketplace. The purpose of this study was to examine college students’ opinions in the areas of awareness, acceptance, and safety of GM foods with regard to nationality and field of study. The survey model is based upon a national survey concerning biotechnology. Genetic modification of foods is one of many examples of the gap between scientists and nonscientists (Chappell & Hartz, 1998). Accordingly, Hoban (2001) stated that consumer awareness and understanding of biotechnology innovation has grown slowly. Despite the increased use of GM food products, GM technology is not well understood in the United States. Several recent surveys demonstrate this lack of understanding by the American public (Falk et al., 2002; Hallman & Hebden, 2005; Hallman, Hebden, Cuite, Aquino, & Lang, 2004). Although 60 to 70% of food products sold at supermarkets include ingredients using genetic modification, many consumers remain unaware of their use (Byrne, 2006). A lack of understanding among the public may lead to uncertainty about the safety of GM food products (Byrne, 2006, Hoban, 2001; Shanahan, 2003). Consumer opinion of GM food safety also differs by nationality (Knight, 2006). Research reveals that U.S. consumers are the least concerned about GM food safety issues whereas European and Asian consumers report more concern (Chern, Rickertsen, Tsubio, & Fu, 2003; Fritz & Fischer, 2007; Pew Initiative, 2005). Even after more than a decade of debate and the increased support of governments in South America and China, the European Union and environmental groups, such as Friends of the Earth, continue to reject the cultivation and use of genetically modified crops (Weise, 2010). College students form a subpopulation of the general public and an area of interest concerning GM food opinions. Within the United States, college students may mingle among nationalities, a previously cited factor of perceptions concerning GM food safety. College students are likely to be younger and more highly educated than the general population and may have a greater awareness of agriculture biotechnology (Finke & Kim, 2003). Science-based coursework, laboratory work, and the beliefs of professors and instructors may contribute to awareness, and these beliefs may be reinforced within the student’s major area of study. As young adults, students may not have formed a strong opinion about this subject, and they may be more open to the different perspectives of agriculture biotechnology (Wingenbach, Rutherford, & Dunsford 2003). T h e J o u rn a l o f Te c h n o lo g y S tu d ie s Factors Affecting College Students’ Knowledge and Opinions of Genetically Modified Foods Chad M. Laux, Gretchen A. Mosher and Steven A. Freeman 2","PeriodicalId":142452,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Technology Studies","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Affecting College Students' Knowledge and Opinions of Genetically Modified Foods\",\"authors\":\"C. Laux, G. Mosher, S. Freeman\",\"doi\":\"10.21061/jots.v36i2.a.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of biotechnology in food and agricultural applications has increased greatly during the past decade and is considered by many to be a controversial topic. Drawing upon a previous national study, a new survey was conducted of U.S. and international college students at a large, land-grant, Research University to determine factors that may affect opinions about genetically modified (GM) food products. Factors examined included nationality, discipline area of study, perceptions of safety, and awareness and levels of acceptance regarding GM food. Results indicated students born outside the United States had more negative opinions about genetically modified foods than did Americanborn students. Students who were studying a physical science-based curriculum had a more positive opinion of GM food than did students studying a curriculum that was not based in the physical science. In addition, students who reported a higher level of acceptance of genetically modified foods felt more positively about the safety of the technology. Introduction The use of biotechnology in food and agriculture has increased greatly during the past decade (Comstock, 2001; Knight, 2006). Global use of genetically modified (GM) plants has increased rapidly since their commercial introduction in 1996. Desirable traits (e.g., insect and herbicide resistance and improved nutritional content) have resulted in a large increase in the number of hectares planted globally. The prevalence of GM crops has increased every year since their introduction, and this will continue (James, 2008). Consumer opinions are important to the success of technological innovation in the marketplace. The purpose of this study was to examine college students’ opinions in the areas of awareness, acceptance, and safety of GM foods with regard to nationality and field of study. The survey model is based upon a national survey concerning biotechnology. Genetic modification of foods is one of many examples of the gap between scientists and nonscientists (Chappell & Hartz, 1998). Accordingly, Hoban (2001) stated that consumer awareness and understanding of biotechnology innovation has grown slowly. Despite the increased use of GM food products, GM technology is not well understood in the United States. Several recent surveys demonstrate this lack of understanding by the American public (Falk et al., 2002; Hallman & Hebden, 2005; Hallman, Hebden, Cuite, Aquino, & Lang, 2004). Although 60 to 70% of food products sold at supermarkets include ingredients using genetic modification, many consumers remain unaware of their use (Byrne, 2006). A lack of understanding among the public may lead to uncertainty about the safety of GM food products (Byrne, 2006, Hoban, 2001; Shanahan, 2003). Consumer opinion of GM food safety also differs by nationality (Knight, 2006). Research reveals that U.S. consumers are the least concerned about GM food safety issues whereas European and Asian consumers report more concern (Chern, Rickertsen, Tsubio, & Fu, 2003; Fritz & Fischer, 2007; Pew Initiative, 2005). Even after more than a decade of debate and the increased support of governments in South America and China, the European Union and environmental groups, such as Friends of the Earth, continue to reject the cultivation and use of genetically modified crops (Weise, 2010). College students form a subpopulation of the general public and an area of interest concerning GM food opinions. Within the United States, college students may mingle among nationalities, a previously cited factor of perceptions concerning GM food safety. College students are likely to be younger and more highly educated than the general population and may have a greater awareness of agriculture biotechnology (Finke & Kim, 2003). Science-based coursework, laboratory work, and the beliefs of professors and instructors may contribute to awareness, and these beliefs may be reinforced within the student’s major area of study. As young adults, students may not have formed a strong opinion about this subject, and they may be more open to the different perspectives of agriculture biotechnology (Wingenbach, Rutherford, & Dunsford 2003). T h e J o u rn a l o f Te c h n o lo g y S tu d ie s Factors Affecting College Students’ Knowledge and Opinions of Genetically Modified Foods Chad M. Laux, Gretchen A. Mosher and Steven A. Freeman 2\",\"PeriodicalId\":142452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Technology Studies\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Technology Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v36i2.a.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v36i2.a.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
在过去十年中,生物技术在食品和农业中的应用大大增加,许多人认为这是一个有争议的话题。在先前的一项全国性研究的基础上,一项新的调查在一所大型赠地研究型大学对美国和国际大学生进行,以确定可能影响人们对转基因食品看法的因素。审查的因素包括国籍、研究学科领域、对安全的看法以及对转基因食品的认识和接受程度。结果表明,在美国以外出生的学生比在美国出生的学生对转基因食品有更多的负面看法。学习以物理科学为基础的课程的学生比学习非物理科学课程的学生对转基因食品的看法更为积极。此外,接受转基因食品程度较高的学生对转基因技术的安全性持更积极的态度。在过去十年中,生物技术在粮食和农业方面的使用大大增加(Comstock, 2001;骑士,2006)。自1996年转基因植物商业化引进以来,全球转基因植物的使用迅速增加。理想的性状(例如,抗虫抗除草剂和改善营养成分)导致全球种植面积的大幅增加。自从引进转基因作物以来,其流行率每年都在增加,而且这种情况将继续下去(James, 2008)。消费者的意见对技术创新在市场上的成功至关重要。本研究的目的是考察大学生在转基因食品的认识、接受和安全性方面的意见,涉及国籍和学习领域。调查模型是基于一项关于生物技术的全国性调查。转基因食品是科学家和非科学家之间存在差距的众多例子之一(Chappell & Hartz, 1998)。因此,Hoban(2001)指出,消费者对生物技术创新的认识和理解增长缓慢。尽管转基因食品的使用越来越多,但转基因技术在美国并没有得到很好的理解。最近的几项调查表明,美国公众对此缺乏了解(Falk et al., 2002;Hallman & Hebden, 2005;Hallman, Hebden, Cuite, Aquino, & Lang, 2004)。尽管在超市出售的食品中有60%到70%含有转基因成分,但许多消费者仍然不知道它们的用途(Byrne, 2006)。公众缺乏了解可能导致对转基因食品安全性的不确定(Byrne, 2006; Hoban, 2001;沙纳,2003)。消费者对转基因食品安全的看法也因国籍而异(Knight, 2006)。研究表明,美国消费者最不关心转基因食品安全问题,而欧洲和亚洲消费者则更关心(Chern, Rickertsen, Tsubio, & Fu, 2003;Fritz & Fischer, 2007;皮尤倡议,2005)。即使经过十多年的辩论,南美和中国政府的支持也越来越多,欧盟和环境组织,如地球之友,继续拒绝种植和使用转基因作物(Weise, 2010)。大学生是普通大众的一个亚群体,也是对转基因食品意见感兴趣的一个领域。在美国,大学生可能混杂在不同的民族中,这是先前提到的对转基因食品安全认知的一个因素。大学生可能比一般人群更年轻,受教育程度更高,可能对农业生物技术有更大的认识(Finke & Kim, 2003)。以科学为基础的课程作业、实验室工作以及教授和讲师的信念可能有助于提高意识,而这些信念可能会在学生的主要学习领域得到加强。作为年轻人,学生们可能还没有对这个主题形成强烈的看法,他们可能对农业生物技术的不同观点更开放(Wingenbach, Rutherford, & Dunsford 2003)。本文对影响大学生对转基因食品的认识和看法的因素进行了调查研究,作者:Chad M. Laux, Gretchen a . Mosher和Steven a . Freeman
Factors Affecting College Students' Knowledge and Opinions of Genetically Modified Foods
The use of biotechnology in food and agricultural applications has increased greatly during the past decade and is considered by many to be a controversial topic. Drawing upon a previous national study, a new survey was conducted of U.S. and international college students at a large, land-grant, Research University to determine factors that may affect opinions about genetically modified (GM) food products. Factors examined included nationality, discipline area of study, perceptions of safety, and awareness and levels of acceptance regarding GM food. Results indicated students born outside the United States had more negative opinions about genetically modified foods than did Americanborn students. Students who were studying a physical science-based curriculum had a more positive opinion of GM food than did students studying a curriculum that was not based in the physical science. In addition, students who reported a higher level of acceptance of genetically modified foods felt more positively about the safety of the technology. Introduction The use of biotechnology in food and agriculture has increased greatly during the past decade (Comstock, 2001; Knight, 2006). Global use of genetically modified (GM) plants has increased rapidly since their commercial introduction in 1996. Desirable traits (e.g., insect and herbicide resistance and improved nutritional content) have resulted in a large increase in the number of hectares planted globally. The prevalence of GM crops has increased every year since their introduction, and this will continue (James, 2008). Consumer opinions are important to the success of technological innovation in the marketplace. The purpose of this study was to examine college students’ opinions in the areas of awareness, acceptance, and safety of GM foods with regard to nationality and field of study. The survey model is based upon a national survey concerning biotechnology. Genetic modification of foods is one of many examples of the gap between scientists and nonscientists (Chappell & Hartz, 1998). Accordingly, Hoban (2001) stated that consumer awareness and understanding of biotechnology innovation has grown slowly. Despite the increased use of GM food products, GM technology is not well understood in the United States. Several recent surveys demonstrate this lack of understanding by the American public (Falk et al., 2002; Hallman & Hebden, 2005; Hallman, Hebden, Cuite, Aquino, & Lang, 2004). Although 60 to 70% of food products sold at supermarkets include ingredients using genetic modification, many consumers remain unaware of their use (Byrne, 2006). A lack of understanding among the public may lead to uncertainty about the safety of GM food products (Byrne, 2006, Hoban, 2001; Shanahan, 2003). Consumer opinion of GM food safety also differs by nationality (Knight, 2006). Research reveals that U.S. consumers are the least concerned about GM food safety issues whereas European and Asian consumers report more concern (Chern, Rickertsen, Tsubio, & Fu, 2003; Fritz & Fischer, 2007; Pew Initiative, 2005). Even after more than a decade of debate and the increased support of governments in South America and China, the European Union and environmental groups, such as Friends of the Earth, continue to reject the cultivation and use of genetically modified crops (Weise, 2010). College students form a subpopulation of the general public and an area of interest concerning GM food opinions. Within the United States, college students may mingle among nationalities, a previously cited factor of perceptions concerning GM food safety. College students are likely to be younger and more highly educated than the general population and may have a greater awareness of agriculture biotechnology (Finke & Kim, 2003). Science-based coursework, laboratory work, and the beliefs of professors and instructors may contribute to awareness, and these beliefs may be reinforced within the student’s major area of study. As young adults, students may not have formed a strong opinion about this subject, and they may be more open to the different perspectives of agriculture biotechnology (Wingenbach, Rutherford, & Dunsford 2003). T h e J o u rn a l o f Te c h n o lo g y S tu d ie s Factors Affecting College Students’ Knowledge and Opinions of Genetically Modified Foods Chad M. Laux, Gretchen A. Mosher and Steven A. Freeman 2