基础设计中的陷阱和谬误

B. Fellenius
{"title":"基础设计中的陷阱和谬误","authors":"B. Fellenius","doi":"10.1061/9780784481639.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design of the load to be placed on footings and piled foundations conventionally includes calculated bearing capacity—a peak, or ultimate, resistance—usually defined as a plastic, or semi-plastic, response to increased load. Such bearing capacity can be found in loading tests on model footings, yet no full-scale tests on footings have show that an ultimate resistance mode has developed unless the load was placed off center—intentionally or not. For pile design, it is recognized that the pile toe is a footing with a long stem and none of the very large number of full-scale tests performed with the pile toe response measured separately from the shaft response, has shown a toe bearing capacity. Instead, the toe responses were similar to those found in tests on full-scale footings, i.e., a gradual, though less than linear, and increase of movement for increasing load. Pile capacity is usually established (interpreted) from the pile-head loadmovement of full-scale tests on single piles. However, the design analysis of the response of a pile to load is usually based on modeling a pile as a series of short elements, each with its ultimate resistance, or peak resistance. In most cases, the shaft resistance for each element beyond that peak is either strain-hardening or strainsoftening. Therefore, as demonstrated by examples, unless the pile is very short or next to infinitely stiff, the accumulated value of the ultimate shaft resistances of the element is not equal to the pile capacity established from the measured loadmovement curve of the pile. Moreover, for pile groups comprising more than about five by five rows of piles, i.e., wide piled foundations, the maximum shaft resistance of the piles in a group is limited to the weight of the soil in-between the piles, and the response of the piles differ between interior and perimeter piles. Design of wide piled foundations and piled rafts must be based on settlement analysis and no contribution from contact stress can be assumed.","PeriodicalId":404790,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Geotechnical Engineering","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pitfalls and Fallacies in Foundation Design\",\"authors\":\"B. Fellenius\",\"doi\":\"10.1061/9780784481639.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Design of the load to be placed on footings and piled foundations conventionally includes calculated bearing capacity—a peak, or ultimate, resistance—usually defined as a plastic, or semi-plastic, response to increased load. Such bearing capacity can be found in loading tests on model footings, yet no full-scale tests on footings have show that an ultimate resistance mode has developed unless the load was placed off center—intentionally or not. For pile design, it is recognized that the pile toe is a footing with a long stem and none of the very large number of full-scale tests performed with the pile toe response measured separately from the shaft response, has shown a toe bearing capacity. Instead, the toe responses were similar to those found in tests on full-scale footings, i.e., a gradual, though less than linear, and increase of movement for increasing load. Pile capacity is usually established (interpreted) from the pile-head loadmovement of full-scale tests on single piles. However, the design analysis of the response of a pile to load is usually based on modeling a pile as a series of short elements, each with its ultimate resistance, or peak resistance. In most cases, the shaft resistance for each element beyond that peak is either strain-hardening or strainsoftening. Therefore, as demonstrated by examples, unless the pile is very short or next to infinitely stiff, the accumulated value of the ultimate shaft resistances of the element is not equal to the pile capacity established from the measured loadmovement curve of the pile. Moreover, for pile groups comprising more than about five by five rows of piles, i.e., wide piled foundations, the maximum shaft resistance of the piles in a group is limited to the weight of the soil in-between the piles, and the response of the piles differ between interior and perimeter piles. Design of wide piled foundations and piled rafts must be based on settlement analysis and no contribution from contact stress can be assumed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations in Geotechnical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations in Geotechnical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481639.020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Geotechnical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481639.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基础和桩基础上荷载的设计通常包括计算承载能力——峰值或极限阻力——通常定义为对增加荷载的塑性或半塑性响应。这种承载能力可以在模型基础的加载测试中找到,但没有对基础的全尺寸测试表明,除非有意或无意地将负载置于偏离中心的位置,否则会产生极限阻力模式。对于桩设计,人们认识到桩趾是一个具有长杆的基础,并且在将桩趾响应与轴响应分开测量的大量全尺寸试验中,没有一个显示出桩趾承载能力。相反,脚趾的反应与在全尺寸基座上的测试中发现的相似,即,随着负载的增加,运动逐渐增加,尽管不是线性的。桩承载力通常由单桩全尺寸试验的桩头荷载移动来确定(解释)。然而,桩对荷载响应的设计分析通常是基于将桩建模为一系列短单元,每个单元都有其极限阻力或峰值阻力。在大多数情况下,超过峰值的每个元件的轴阻力要么是应变硬化,要么是应变软化。因此,如算例所示,除非桩体非常短或接近无限刚度,否则构件的极限桩身阻力累积值并不等于实测桩体荷载移动曲线所确定的桩体承载力。此外,对于大于5 × 5排的群桩,即宽桩基础,群桩的最大轴阻力受限于桩间土的重量,桩的响应在内桩和周桩之间是不同的。宽桩基础和桩筏的设计必须基于沉降分析,不能假设接触应力的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pitfalls and Fallacies in Foundation Design
Design of the load to be placed on footings and piled foundations conventionally includes calculated bearing capacity—a peak, or ultimate, resistance—usually defined as a plastic, or semi-plastic, response to increased load. Such bearing capacity can be found in loading tests on model footings, yet no full-scale tests on footings have show that an ultimate resistance mode has developed unless the load was placed off center—intentionally or not. For pile design, it is recognized that the pile toe is a footing with a long stem and none of the very large number of full-scale tests performed with the pile toe response measured separately from the shaft response, has shown a toe bearing capacity. Instead, the toe responses were similar to those found in tests on full-scale footings, i.e., a gradual, though less than linear, and increase of movement for increasing load. Pile capacity is usually established (interpreted) from the pile-head loadmovement of full-scale tests on single piles. However, the design analysis of the response of a pile to load is usually based on modeling a pile as a series of short elements, each with its ultimate resistance, or peak resistance. In most cases, the shaft resistance for each element beyond that peak is either strain-hardening or strainsoftening. Therefore, as demonstrated by examples, unless the pile is very short or next to infinitely stiff, the accumulated value of the ultimate shaft resistances of the element is not equal to the pile capacity established from the measured loadmovement curve of the pile. Moreover, for pile groups comprising more than about five by five rows of piles, i.e., wide piled foundations, the maximum shaft resistance of the piles in a group is limited to the weight of the soil in-between the piles, and the response of the piles differ between interior and perimeter piles. Design of wide piled foundations and piled rafts must be based on settlement analysis and no contribution from contact stress can be assumed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Highway Bridge Supported on ACIP Piles in Clay Soils: Instrumentation, Monitoring and Performance of Service Piles Protection of Civil Infrastructure against Extreme Vehicle Crashes: Design of Impact-Resistant Piles Geotechnical and Engineering Geological Aspects of the St. Petersburg Subway Tunnels Serviceability and Safety Direct CPT Method for 130 Footings on Sands Pitfalls and Fallacies in Foundation Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1