最大限度的客户服务总是一件好事吗?顾客对过度周到服务的满意度

Hsuan‐Hsuan Ku, C. Kuo, Martin Chen
{"title":"最大限度的客户服务总是一件好事吗?顾客对过度周到服务的满意度","authors":"Hsuan‐Hsuan Ku, C. Kuo, Martin Chen","doi":"10.1108/MSQ-10-2012-0142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – To investigate customer satisfaction with service encounters characterized by an over‐attentive level of service, and the contextual and individual factors moderating the resulting satisfaction scores.Design/methodology/approach – The first of three formal experiments tests the prediction that consumer reactions vary with the margin between actual and expected levels of service. The second examines the influence of the tendency to psychological reactance on participants’ responses to excessive service. The third assesses the effect of a predisposition to suspiciousness on satisfaction scores, in scenarios which, respectively, specify that extremely over‐attentive service or “normal” service are directed at participants personally or is offered to all customers unselectively.Findings – The first experiment found moderately excessive service to be acceptable to most participants but unexpectedly over‐attentive service to affect satisfaction negatively. The second found the negative impact of extre...","PeriodicalId":313036,"journal":{"name":"Managing Service Quality","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is maximum customer service always a good thing? Customer satisfaction in response to over‐attentive service\",\"authors\":\"Hsuan‐Hsuan Ku, C. Kuo, Martin Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/MSQ-10-2012-0142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – To investigate customer satisfaction with service encounters characterized by an over‐attentive level of service, and the contextual and individual factors moderating the resulting satisfaction scores.Design/methodology/approach – The first of three formal experiments tests the prediction that consumer reactions vary with the margin between actual and expected levels of service. The second examines the influence of the tendency to psychological reactance on participants’ responses to excessive service. The third assesses the effect of a predisposition to suspiciousness on satisfaction scores, in scenarios which, respectively, specify that extremely over‐attentive service or “normal” service are directed at participants personally or is offered to all customers unselectively.Findings – The first experiment found moderately excessive service to be acceptable to most participants but unexpectedly over‐attentive service to affect satisfaction negatively. The second found the negative impact of extre...\",\"PeriodicalId\":313036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managing Service Quality\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managing Service Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-10-2012-0142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managing Service Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-10-2012-0142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

目的-调查客户对服务体验的满意度,其特征是服务水平过于专注,以及影响满意度得分的环境和个人因素。设计/方法/方法——三个正式实验中的第一个测试预测,即消费者的反应随实际服务水平和预期服务水平之间的差额而变化。第二项研究考察了心理抗拒倾向对参与者过度服务反应的影响。第三个测试评估了怀疑倾向对满意度得分的影响,分别在以下两种情况下进行:极度过度关注的服务或“正常”的服务是针对参与者个人的,还是不加选择地提供给所有客户的。研究发现:第一个实验发现,大多数参与者可以接受适度过度的服务,但出乎意料的是,过度细心的服务会对满意度产生负面影响。第二项研究发现了极端……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is maximum customer service always a good thing? Customer satisfaction in response to over‐attentive service
Purpose – To investigate customer satisfaction with service encounters characterized by an over‐attentive level of service, and the contextual and individual factors moderating the resulting satisfaction scores.Design/methodology/approach – The first of three formal experiments tests the prediction that consumer reactions vary with the margin between actual and expected levels of service. The second examines the influence of the tendency to psychological reactance on participants’ responses to excessive service. The third assesses the effect of a predisposition to suspiciousness on satisfaction scores, in scenarios which, respectively, specify that extremely over‐attentive service or “normal” service are directed at participants personally or is offered to all customers unselectively.Findings – The first experiment found moderately excessive service to be acceptable to most participants but unexpectedly over‐attentive service to affect satisfaction negatively. The second found the negative impact of extre...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Addressing complexity and taking a systemic view in service research Research traditions of innovation: Goods-dominant logic, the resource-based approach, and service-dominant logic The collective consumption network Beyond virtuality: from engagement platforms to engagement ecosystems Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1