M. Faghy, R. Ashton, R. Owen, J. Yates, C. Thomas, T. Maden-Wilkinson, S. V. N. Santhosh Kumar, R. Gururaj, C. Ozemek, R. Arena, T. Bewick
{"title":"P227:一项观察性队列分析,在Long COVID诊所就诊的患者中,呼吸肌力量、肺功能、功能状态和症状降低","authors":"M. Faghy, R. Ashton, R. Owen, J. Yates, C. Thomas, T. Maden-Wilkinson, S. V. N. Santhosh Kumar, R. Gururaj, C. Ozemek, R. Arena, T. Bewick","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2022-btsabstracts.359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionOne in ten people will develop Long COVID (LC) following infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Despite broad-ranging and episodic symptomology, there are no data that demonstrate changes in functional status (FS), respiratory muscle strength and lung function over time. We conducted a sixteen-week cohort observation of LC patients to determine changes in FS, respiratory muscle strength and lung function.MethodSixty-six patients (n=48 females, mean age 51 ± 10 years, n=8 hospitalised, mean time post-infection 6.2 ± 1.8 months) were recruited from LC clinics in the United Kingdom (CPMS ID: 52331). Patients completed five face-to-face visits (day 0, 28, 56, 84 and 110 ± 3 days) and bi-weekly telephone consultations (day 14, 42, 70 and 98 ± 3 days). FS was assessed via the post-COVID functional status scale (PCFS) and the six-minute walk test (6MWT). Maximum inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) respiratory muscle pressure and lung function (forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) were assessed during face-to-face visits according to published standards.ResultsPCFS was 2.7 ± 0.4 AU, P=0.02 at baseline and improved at 16-weeks (2.1 ±1.1 AU) and still highlighted impaired FS. 6MWT was 322 ± 133 meters at baseline and improved at 16 weeks (430 ± 150 meters, P<0.01) but remained lower than normative values for healthy age-matched controls. MIP was 77 ± 21 cmH2O at baseline (86% predicted) and was unchanged post 16 weeks (88 ± 25 cmH2O, 92% predicted, P>0.05). Baseline MEP was 115 ± 41 cmH2O (96% and was unchanged post-16-weeks (119 ± 48 cmH2O, 92% predicted, P>0.05). Lung function data were below predicted values and unchanged over 16 weeks (baseline FVC: 3.10 ± 0.53 L.s-1, 72% predicted, post 16 weeks: 3.16 ± 0.34 L.s-1, 73% predicted, P>0.05 and baseline FEV1: 2.68 ± 0.39 L.s-1, 85% predicted, post 16 weeks: 2.75 ± 0.36 L.s-1, 85% predicted).ConclusionLC patients demonstrate reduced respiratory muscle strength and lung function which could be associated with reduced FS and should be addressed via specific rehabilitation approaches.Please refer to page A216 for declarations of interest related to this .","PeriodicalId":338428,"journal":{"name":"‘Endgame’ – Long term impacts of COVID-19","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P227 Reduced respiratory muscle strength, lung function, and functional status and symptomology in patients referred to Long COVID clinics, an observational cohort analysis\",\"authors\":\"M. Faghy, R. Ashton, R. Owen, J. Yates, C. Thomas, T. Maden-Wilkinson, S. V. N. Santhosh Kumar, R. Gururaj, C. Ozemek, R. Arena, T. Bewick\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/thorax-2022-btsabstracts.359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionOne in ten people will develop Long COVID (LC) following infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Despite broad-ranging and episodic symptomology, there are no data that demonstrate changes in functional status (FS), respiratory muscle strength and lung function over time. We conducted a sixteen-week cohort observation of LC patients to determine changes in FS, respiratory muscle strength and lung function.MethodSixty-six patients (n=48 females, mean age 51 ± 10 years, n=8 hospitalised, mean time post-infection 6.2 ± 1.8 months) were recruited from LC clinics in the United Kingdom (CPMS ID: 52331). Patients completed five face-to-face visits (day 0, 28, 56, 84 and 110 ± 3 days) and bi-weekly telephone consultations (day 14, 42, 70 and 98 ± 3 days). FS was assessed via the post-COVID functional status scale (PCFS) and the six-minute walk test (6MWT). Maximum inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) respiratory muscle pressure and lung function (forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) were assessed during face-to-face visits according to published standards.ResultsPCFS was 2.7 ± 0.4 AU, P=0.02 at baseline and improved at 16-weeks (2.1 ±1.1 AU) and still highlighted impaired FS. 6MWT was 322 ± 133 meters at baseline and improved at 16 weeks (430 ± 150 meters, P<0.01) but remained lower than normative values for healthy age-matched controls. MIP was 77 ± 21 cmH2O at baseline (86% predicted) and was unchanged post 16 weeks (88 ± 25 cmH2O, 92% predicted, P>0.05). Baseline MEP was 115 ± 41 cmH2O (96% and was unchanged post-16-weeks (119 ± 48 cmH2O, 92% predicted, P>0.05). Lung function data were below predicted values and unchanged over 16 weeks (baseline FVC: 3.10 ± 0.53 L.s-1, 72% predicted, post 16 weeks: 3.16 ± 0.34 L.s-1, 73% predicted, P>0.05 and baseline FEV1: 2.68 ± 0.39 L.s-1, 85% predicted, post 16 weeks: 2.75 ± 0.36 L.s-1, 85% predicted).ConclusionLC patients demonstrate reduced respiratory muscle strength and lung function which could be associated with reduced FS and should be addressed via specific rehabilitation approaches.Please refer to page A216 for declarations of interest related to this .\",\"PeriodicalId\":338428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"‘Endgame’ – Long term impacts of COVID-19\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"‘Endgame’ – Long term impacts of COVID-19\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2022-btsabstracts.359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"‘Endgame’ – Long term impacts of COVID-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2022-btsabstracts.359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
十分之一的人在感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)后会患上长冠状病毒(LC)。尽管有广泛的发作性症状,但没有数据表明功能状态(FS)、呼吸肌力量和肺功能随时间的变化。我们对LC患者进行了为期16周的队列观察,以确定FS、呼吸肌力量和肺功能的变化。方法从英国LC诊所(CPMS ID: 52331)招募66例患者(女性48例,平均年龄51±10岁,住院8例,平均感染后时间6.2±1.8个月)。患者完成5次面对面就诊(第0、28、56、84和110±3天)和两周一次电话咨询(第14、42、70和98±3天)。通过新冠肺炎后功能状态量表(PCFS)和6分钟步行测试(6MWT)评估FS。面对面访问时,根据公布的标准评估最大吸气(MIP)和呼气(MEP)呼吸肌压力和肺功能(用力肺活量(FVC)和用力呼气容积(FEV1)。结果16周时spcfs为2.7±0.4 AU, P=0.02; 16周时spcfs有所改善(2.1±1.1 AU),但仍突出FS受损。6MWT基线时为322±133米,16周时改善(430±150米,P0.05)。基线MEP为115±41 cmH2O(96%), 16周后不变(119±48 cmH2O, 92%预测,P>0.05)。肺功能数据低于预测值,16周内无变化(基线FVC: 3.10±0.53 l -1,预测72%,16周后:3.16±0.34 l -1,预测73%,P>0.05;基线FEV1: 2.68±0.39 l -1,预测85%,16周后:2.75±0.36 l -1,预测85%)。结论lc患者表现为呼吸肌力和肺功能下降,这可能与FS的减轻有关,应通过针对性的康复方法加以解决。有关的利益申报,请参阅A216页。
P227 Reduced respiratory muscle strength, lung function, and functional status and symptomology in patients referred to Long COVID clinics, an observational cohort analysis
IntroductionOne in ten people will develop Long COVID (LC) following infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Despite broad-ranging and episodic symptomology, there are no data that demonstrate changes in functional status (FS), respiratory muscle strength and lung function over time. We conducted a sixteen-week cohort observation of LC patients to determine changes in FS, respiratory muscle strength and lung function.MethodSixty-six patients (n=48 females, mean age 51 ± 10 years, n=8 hospitalised, mean time post-infection 6.2 ± 1.8 months) were recruited from LC clinics in the United Kingdom (CPMS ID: 52331). Patients completed five face-to-face visits (day 0, 28, 56, 84 and 110 ± 3 days) and bi-weekly telephone consultations (day 14, 42, 70 and 98 ± 3 days). FS was assessed via the post-COVID functional status scale (PCFS) and the six-minute walk test (6MWT). Maximum inspiratory (MIP) and expiratory (MEP) respiratory muscle pressure and lung function (forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expired volume in one second (FEV1) were assessed during face-to-face visits according to published standards.ResultsPCFS was 2.7 ± 0.4 AU, P=0.02 at baseline and improved at 16-weeks (2.1 ±1.1 AU) and still highlighted impaired FS. 6MWT was 322 ± 133 meters at baseline and improved at 16 weeks (430 ± 150 meters, P<0.01) but remained lower than normative values for healthy age-matched controls. MIP was 77 ± 21 cmH2O at baseline (86% predicted) and was unchanged post 16 weeks (88 ± 25 cmH2O, 92% predicted, P>0.05). Baseline MEP was 115 ± 41 cmH2O (96% and was unchanged post-16-weeks (119 ± 48 cmH2O, 92% predicted, P>0.05). Lung function data were below predicted values and unchanged over 16 weeks (baseline FVC: 3.10 ± 0.53 L.s-1, 72% predicted, post 16 weeks: 3.16 ± 0.34 L.s-1, 73% predicted, P>0.05 and baseline FEV1: 2.68 ± 0.39 L.s-1, 85% predicted, post 16 weeks: 2.75 ± 0.36 L.s-1, 85% predicted).ConclusionLC patients demonstrate reduced respiratory muscle strength and lung function which could be associated with reduced FS and should be addressed via specific rehabilitation approaches.Please refer to page A216 for declarations of interest related to this .