来自泰国腹膜透析数据库的腹膜炎病原菌报告

S. Changsirikulchai, Suwanee Sriprach, N. Sripaiboonkij, J. Janma, P. Chuengsaman, D. Sirivongs
{"title":"来自泰国腹膜透析数据库的腹膜炎病原菌报告","authors":"S. Changsirikulchai, Suwanee Sriprach, N. Sripaiboonkij, J. Janma, P. Chuengsaman, D. Sirivongs","doi":"10.15582/IJPD/2017/120290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The peritonitis (PN) is one important clinical outcome which should be monitored by peritoneal dialysis units. To report the types of pathogens isolated from patients with peritoneal dialysis who had peritonitis. We have developed a web-based program named the Database of Peritoneal dialysis in the EXcel (DPEX). It is a program for peritoneal dialysis units to use for monitoring clinical outcomes of patients with peritoneal dialysis (PD) for continuous quality improvement. We have analyzed the data of PD patients with peritonitis during November, 2007 to September, 2015.The causative organisms were classified by cultures. The 2 month outcomes of PN consisted of the continuation of PD, technique failure or mortality rates were evaluated. The technique failure was defined as catheter removal and/or a shift to permanent hemodialysis. There were 1,300 (51.9%) males and 1,207 (48.1%)females .The mean (SD) age when PD was initiated was 54.1 (15.2) [95%CI 53.5-54.7] years. Patients with diabetes numbered 1,367 (54.5%). Patients were categorized with education levels as illiterate, primary school, secondary school, university and unknown were 728 (29%), 1,288 (51.4%), 354 (14.1%), 63 (2.5%), and 74 (3%), respectively. Universal health coverage scheme covered 2,341 (93.4%) of the cases. The numbers of gram positive, gram negative, culture negative, fungal, mycobacterial and polymicrobial PN were 1,332 (31.8%), 1,179 (28.1%), 1,498 (35.7%), 141 (3.4%), 25 (0.6%), and 15 (0.4%), respectively. The most common gram positive pathogens were Staphylococcus spp (coagulase negative and coagulase positive, not including S.aureus) 339 (25.5%) followed by Streptococcal spp. 288 (21.6%). Also, Staphylococcus aureusspp was identified in216 (16.2%). The most common gram negative pathogens were E.coli429 (36.4%) followed by Klebsiella spp. 196 (16.6%), and P.aeruginosa 142 (12.0%). The patients who continued PD, had technique failure and mortality at2,079 (82.9%), 233 (9.3%) and 178 (7.1%), respectively. There were 17 (0.7%) cases that could not be evaluated as they were transferred to other PD centers. The numbers of culture negative PN were high. Most patients who contracted PN were able to continue with PD.","PeriodicalId":442296,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Peritoneal dialysis","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Report of Causative Organisms in Peritonitis from the Database of Peritoneal Dialysis in Thailand Excelprogram\",\"authors\":\"S. Changsirikulchai, Suwanee Sriprach, N. Sripaiboonkij, J. Janma, P. Chuengsaman, D. Sirivongs\",\"doi\":\"10.15582/IJPD/2017/120290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The peritonitis (PN) is one important clinical outcome which should be monitored by peritoneal dialysis units. To report the types of pathogens isolated from patients with peritoneal dialysis who had peritonitis. We have developed a web-based program named the Database of Peritoneal dialysis in the EXcel (DPEX). It is a program for peritoneal dialysis units to use for monitoring clinical outcomes of patients with peritoneal dialysis (PD) for continuous quality improvement. We have analyzed the data of PD patients with peritonitis during November, 2007 to September, 2015.The causative organisms were classified by cultures. The 2 month outcomes of PN consisted of the continuation of PD, technique failure or mortality rates were evaluated. The technique failure was defined as catheter removal and/or a shift to permanent hemodialysis. There were 1,300 (51.9%) males and 1,207 (48.1%)females .The mean (SD) age when PD was initiated was 54.1 (15.2) [95%CI 53.5-54.7] years. Patients with diabetes numbered 1,367 (54.5%). Patients were categorized with education levels as illiterate, primary school, secondary school, university and unknown were 728 (29%), 1,288 (51.4%), 354 (14.1%), 63 (2.5%), and 74 (3%), respectively. Universal health coverage scheme covered 2,341 (93.4%) of the cases. The numbers of gram positive, gram negative, culture negative, fungal, mycobacterial and polymicrobial PN were 1,332 (31.8%), 1,179 (28.1%), 1,498 (35.7%), 141 (3.4%), 25 (0.6%), and 15 (0.4%), respectively. The most common gram positive pathogens were Staphylococcus spp (coagulase negative and coagulase positive, not including S.aureus) 339 (25.5%) followed by Streptococcal spp. 288 (21.6%). Also, Staphylococcus aureusspp was identified in216 (16.2%). The most common gram negative pathogens were E.coli429 (36.4%) followed by Klebsiella spp. 196 (16.6%), and P.aeruginosa 142 (12.0%). The patients who continued PD, had technique failure and mortality at2,079 (82.9%), 233 (9.3%) and 178 (7.1%), respectively. There were 17 (0.7%) cases that could not be evaluated as they were transferred to other PD centers. The numbers of culture negative PN were high. Most patients who contracted PN were able to continue with PD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":442296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Peritoneal dialysis\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Peritoneal dialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15582/IJPD/2017/120290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Peritoneal dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15582/IJPD/2017/120290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腹膜炎(PN)是一个重要的临床结果,应监测腹膜透析单位。目的报道腹膜透析患者腹膜炎的病原菌类型。我们开发了一个基于网络的程序,名为EXcel腹膜透析数据库(DPEX)。它是腹膜透析单位用于监测腹膜透析(PD)患者的临床结果以持续改善质量的程序。我们已经分析了PD患者腹膜炎的数据在11月,2007年9月,2015年。病原微生物按培养物分类。2月PN的结果由PD的延续,技术故障或死亡率进行了评估。技术失败被定义为导管拔除和/或转向永久性血液透析。男性1300例(51.9%),女性1207例(48.1%)。PD发病的平均年龄(SD)为54.1(15.2)岁[95%CI 53.5 ~ 54.7]岁。糖尿病患者为1367人(54.5%)。文盲、小学、中学、大学、未知分别为728人(29%)、1288人(51.4%)、354人(14.1%)、63人(2.5%)、74人(3%)。全民健康保险计划覆盖了2 341例(93.4%)病例。革兰氏阳性、革兰氏阴性、培养阴性、真菌、分枝杆菌和多微生物PN分别为1332例(31.8%)、1179例(28.1%)、1498例(35.7%)、141例(3.4%)、25例(0.6%)和15例(0.4%)。最常见的革兰氏阳性病原菌为葡萄球菌(凝固酶阴性和凝固酶阳性,不包括金黄色葡萄球菌)339株(25.5%),其次为链球菌288株(21.6%)。216例(16.2%)检出金黄色葡萄球菌。最常见的革兰氏阴性病原菌为大肠杆菌429(36.4%),其次为克雷伯氏菌196(16.6%)和铜绿假单胞菌142(12.0%)。继续PD治疗的患者,技术失败和死亡率分别为2079(82.9%)、233(9.3%)和178(7.1%)。有17例(0.7%)由于转移到其他PD中心而无法评估。培养阴性PN数较多。大多数感染PN的患者能够继续进行PD治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Report of Causative Organisms in Peritonitis from the Database of Peritoneal Dialysis in Thailand Excelprogram
The peritonitis (PN) is one important clinical outcome which should be monitored by peritoneal dialysis units. To report the types of pathogens isolated from patients with peritoneal dialysis who had peritonitis. We have developed a web-based program named the Database of Peritoneal dialysis in the EXcel (DPEX). It is a program for peritoneal dialysis units to use for monitoring clinical outcomes of patients with peritoneal dialysis (PD) for continuous quality improvement. We have analyzed the data of PD patients with peritonitis during November, 2007 to September, 2015.The causative organisms were classified by cultures. The 2 month outcomes of PN consisted of the continuation of PD, technique failure or mortality rates were evaluated. The technique failure was defined as catheter removal and/or a shift to permanent hemodialysis. There were 1,300 (51.9%) males and 1,207 (48.1%)females .The mean (SD) age when PD was initiated was 54.1 (15.2) [95%CI 53.5-54.7] years. Patients with diabetes numbered 1,367 (54.5%). Patients were categorized with education levels as illiterate, primary school, secondary school, university and unknown were 728 (29%), 1,288 (51.4%), 354 (14.1%), 63 (2.5%), and 74 (3%), respectively. Universal health coverage scheme covered 2,341 (93.4%) of the cases. The numbers of gram positive, gram negative, culture negative, fungal, mycobacterial and polymicrobial PN were 1,332 (31.8%), 1,179 (28.1%), 1,498 (35.7%), 141 (3.4%), 25 (0.6%), and 15 (0.4%), respectively. The most common gram positive pathogens were Staphylococcus spp (coagulase negative and coagulase positive, not including S.aureus) 339 (25.5%) followed by Streptococcal spp. 288 (21.6%). Also, Staphylococcus aureusspp was identified in216 (16.2%). The most common gram negative pathogens were E.coli429 (36.4%) followed by Klebsiella spp. 196 (16.6%), and P.aeruginosa 142 (12.0%). The patients who continued PD, had technique failure and mortality at2,079 (82.9%), 233 (9.3%) and 178 (7.1%), respectively. There were 17 (0.7%) cases that could not be evaluated as they were transferred to other PD centers. The numbers of culture negative PN were high. Most patients who contracted PN were able to continue with PD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Report of Causative Organisms in Peritonitis from the Database of Peritoneal Dialysis in Thailand Excelprogram GeneXpert Technique a New Diagnostic Modality for Diagnosis of Tuberculous Peritonitis in Patients on CAPD with a Review of Literature A Novel Use for Used CAPD Bags Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Programme:Experience of State Run Tertiary Care Centre Tuberculous Meningitis in PD Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1