对并行文件系统的检查策略进行指纹识别

Runzhou Han, Duo Zhang, Mai Zheng
{"title":"对并行文件系统的检查策略进行指纹识别","authors":"Runzhou Han, Duo Zhang, Mai Zheng","doi":"10.1109/PDSW51947.2020.00013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parallel file systems (PFSes) play an essential role in high performance computing. To ensure the integrity, many PFSes are designed with a checker component, which serves as the last line of defense to bring a corrupted PFS back to a healthy state. Motivated by real-world incidents of PFS corruptions, we perform a fine-grained study on the capability of PFS checkers in this paper. We apply type-aware fault injection to specific PFS structures, and examine the detection and repair policies of PFS checkers meticulously via a well-defined taxonomy. The study results on two representative PFS checkers show that they are able to handle a wide range of corruptions on important data structures. On the other hand, neither of them is perfect: there are multiple cases where the checkers may behave sub-optimally, leading to kernel panics, wrong repairs, etc. Our work has led to a new patch on Lustre. We hope to develop our methodology into a generic framework for analyzing the checkers of diverse PFSes, and enable more elegant designs of PFS checkers for reliable high-performance computing.","PeriodicalId":142923,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE/ACM Fifth International Parallel Data Systems Workshop (PDSW)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fingerprinting the Checker Policies of Parallel File Systems\",\"authors\":\"Runzhou Han, Duo Zhang, Mai Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PDSW51947.2020.00013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Parallel file systems (PFSes) play an essential role in high performance computing. To ensure the integrity, many PFSes are designed with a checker component, which serves as the last line of defense to bring a corrupted PFS back to a healthy state. Motivated by real-world incidents of PFS corruptions, we perform a fine-grained study on the capability of PFS checkers in this paper. We apply type-aware fault injection to specific PFS structures, and examine the detection and repair policies of PFS checkers meticulously via a well-defined taxonomy. The study results on two representative PFS checkers show that they are able to handle a wide range of corruptions on important data structures. On the other hand, neither of them is perfect: there are multiple cases where the checkers may behave sub-optimally, leading to kernel panics, wrong repairs, etc. Our work has led to a new patch on Lustre. We hope to develop our methodology into a generic framework for analyzing the checkers of diverse PFSes, and enable more elegant designs of PFS checkers for reliable high-performance computing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE/ACM Fifth International Parallel Data Systems Workshop (PDSW)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE/ACM Fifth International Parallel Data Systems Workshop (PDSW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDSW51947.2020.00013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE/ACM Fifth International Parallel Data Systems Workshop (PDSW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDSW51947.2020.00013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

并行文件系统(pfse)在高性能计算中扮演着重要的角色。为了确保完整性,许多PFS都设计了检查器组件,这是将损坏的PFS恢复到健康状态的最后一道防线。受现实世界中PFS损坏事件的启发,我们在本文中对PFS检查器的能力进行了细粒度的研究。我们将类型感知故障注入应用于特定的PFS结构,并通过定义良好的分类法仔细检查PFS检查器的检测和修复策略。在两个具有代表性的PFS检查器上的研究结果表明,它们能够处理重要数据结构上的大范围损坏。另一方面,它们都不是完美的:在很多情况下,检查器的行为可能不是最优的,从而导致内核恐慌、错误修复等。我们的工作为光泽带来了新的补丁。我们希望将我们的方法发展成为分析各种PFS检查器的通用框架,并为可靠的高性能计算提供更优雅的PFS检查器设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fingerprinting the Checker Policies of Parallel File Systems
Parallel file systems (PFSes) play an essential role in high performance computing. To ensure the integrity, many PFSes are designed with a checker component, which serves as the last line of defense to bring a corrupted PFS back to a healthy state. Motivated by real-world incidents of PFS corruptions, we perform a fine-grained study on the capability of PFS checkers in this paper. We apply type-aware fault injection to specific PFS structures, and examine the detection and repair policies of PFS checkers meticulously via a well-defined taxonomy. The study results on two representative PFS checkers show that they are able to handle a wide range of corruptions on important data structures. On the other hand, neither of them is perfect: there are multiple cases where the checkers may behave sub-optimally, leading to kernel panics, wrong repairs, etc. Our work has led to a new patch on Lustre. We hope to develop our methodology into a generic framework for analyzing the checkers of diverse PFSes, and enable more elegant designs of PFS checkers for reliable high-performance computing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fractional-Overlap Declustered Parity: Evaluating Reliability for Storage Systems GPU Direct I/O with HDF5 Keeping It Real: Why HPC Data Services Don't Achieve I/O Microbenchmark Performance Fingerprinting the Checker Policies of Parallel File Systems [Title page]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1