阻止Twitter自动化:用户可以信任到什么程度?

S. Sivanesh, K. Kavin, A. Hassan
{"title":"阻止Twitter自动化:用户可以信任到什么程度?","authors":"S. Sivanesh, K. Kavin, A. Hassan","doi":"10.1109/ICHCI-IEEE.2013.6887787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the popularity of social networking sites proves a lofty raise in their users. Twitter, a micro blogging service less than seven years old, commands more than 500 million users as of July 2012 and is still growing fast. In Twitter, users exchange their ideas through a text based posts called tweets which can have maximum 140 characters. The prevalence and open structure of Twitter paved a way for automated programs, known as bots, which becomes a tremendous threat for its users. In this paper, we differentiate the trustworthy human users and the automated programs (bots) to make the user understand with whom they are interacting with. We developed a few sample of bot programs to compare their characteristics with the characteristics of normal human user. We observed the difference among human and bot in terms of tweeting behavior, tweet content, account properties and its networking flow characteristics. Based on the experimental results, we effectively differentiate the users into human and bot.","PeriodicalId":419263,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Conference on Human Computer Interactions (ICHCI)","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frustrate Twitter from automation: How far a user can be trusted?\",\"authors\":\"S. Sivanesh, K. Kavin, A. Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICHCI-IEEE.2013.6887787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, the popularity of social networking sites proves a lofty raise in their users. Twitter, a micro blogging service less than seven years old, commands more than 500 million users as of July 2012 and is still growing fast. In Twitter, users exchange their ideas through a text based posts called tweets which can have maximum 140 characters. The prevalence and open structure of Twitter paved a way for automated programs, known as bots, which becomes a tremendous threat for its users. In this paper, we differentiate the trustworthy human users and the automated programs (bots) to make the user understand with whom they are interacting with. We developed a few sample of bot programs to compare their characteristics with the characteristics of normal human user. We observed the difference among human and bot in terms of tweeting behavior, tweet content, account properties and its networking flow characteristics. Based on the experimental results, we effectively differentiate the users into human and bot.\",\"PeriodicalId\":419263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 International Conference on Human Computer Interactions (ICHCI)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 International Conference on Human Computer Interactions (ICHCI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHCI-IEEE.2013.6887787\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Conference on Human Computer Interactions (ICHCI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHCI-IEEE.2013.6887787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

近年来,社交网站的普及证明了其用户数量的大幅增长。Twitter是一个成立不到7年的微博服务,截至2012年7月,它拥有超过5亿用户,而且仍在快速增长。在Twitter上,用户通过一种基于文本的帖子来交换他们的想法,这种帖子最多可以有140个字符。Twitter的流行和开放结构为被称为机器人的自动化程序铺平了道路,这对其用户构成了巨大的威胁。在本文中,我们区分了值得信赖的人类用户和自动程序(机器人),以使用户了解他们正在与谁交互。我们开发了一些机器人程序的样本,将它们的特征与正常人类用户的特征进行比较。我们观察了人类和机器人在推文行为、推文内容、账户属性及其网络流特征方面的差异。基于实验结果,我们有效地将用户划分为人类和机器人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Frustrate Twitter from automation: How far a user can be trusted?
In recent years, the popularity of social networking sites proves a lofty raise in their users. Twitter, a micro blogging service less than seven years old, commands more than 500 million users as of July 2012 and is still growing fast. In Twitter, users exchange their ideas through a text based posts called tweets which can have maximum 140 characters. The prevalence and open structure of Twitter paved a way for automated programs, known as bots, which becomes a tremendous threat for its users. In this paper, we differentiate the trustworthy human users and the automated programs (bots) to make the user understand with whom they are interacting with. We developed a few sample of bot programs to compare their characteristics with the characteristics of normal human user. We observed the difference among human and bot in terms of tweeting behavior, tweet content, account properties and its networking flow characteristics. Based on the experimental results, we effectively differentiate the users into human and bot.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An efficient technique for video content managing in peer-to-peer computing using multilevel cache and bandwidth based cluster A feasibility study for developing an emotional control system through brain computer interface Various levels of human stress & their impact on human computer interaction Partial-retuning of decentralised PI controller of nonlinear multivariable process using firefly algorithm Automation framework for localizability testing of internationalized software
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1