司法介入与科学比较研究导论

Science and Judicial Reasoning Pub Date : 2020-10-29 DOI:10.1017/9781108779173.002

Katalin Sulyok, Philip C. Jessup

{"title":"司法介入与科学比较研究导论","authors":"Katalin Sulyok, Philip C. Jessup","doi":"10.1017/9781108779173.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To make this abstract concept more amenable to a ﬁne-grained comparative analysis, judicial engagement with science will be evaluated with respect to four distinct stages of the adjudicatory process. This research will identify and compara-tively assess the judicial techniques serving for engaging with science speciﬁcally at the following stages of adjudication:","PeriodicalId":340722,"journal":{"name":"Science and Judicial Reasoning","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to a Comparative Study on Judicial Engagement with Science\",\"authors\":\"Katalin Sulyok, Philip C. Jessup\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108779173.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To make this abstract concept more amenable to a ﬁne-grained comparative analysis, judicial engagement with science will be evaluated with respect to four distinct stages of the adjudicatory process. This research will identify and compara-tively assess the judicial techniques serving for engaging with science speciﬁcally at the following stages of adjudication:\",\"PeriodicalId\":340722,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science and Judicial Reasoning\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science and Judicial Reasoning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108779173.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and Judicial Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108779173.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

为了使这一抽象概念更适合于细粒度的比较分析，将根据审判过程的四个不同阶段来评估司法与科学的关系。本研究将确定并比较评估在以下审判阶段为参与科学服务的司法技术:

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Introduction to a Comparative Study on Judicial Engagement with Science

To make this abstract concept more amenable to a ﬁne-grained comparative analysis, judicial engagement with science will be evaluated with respect to four distinct stages of the adjudicatory process. This research will identify and compara-tively assess the judicial techniques serving for engaging with science speciﬁcally at the following stages of adjudication:

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Science and Judicial Reasoning

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊最新文献

Index Introduction to a Comparative Study on Judicial Engagement with Science Trends in Judicial Engagement with Science: A Comparative Assessment Science and the Legitimacy of Judicial Reasoning Science in the Practice of Investment Arbitral Tribunals