工程教育多元化的干预模式

Daniela Freitag, A. Thaler
{"title":"工程教育多元化的干预模式","authors":"Daniela Freitag, A. Thaler","doi":"10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent trends in the numbers of engineering students in education suggest that there is a need for change in engineering study programs. One attempt to gain more students is to address a more diverse students' population. This paper draws on current studies on good practice in engineering education in Europe. Based on empirical data, two major trends will be discussed: first, the role of interdisciplinary courses attracting not only more women but generally more ‘non-typical’ engineering students. Second, women only engineering degree courses as an apparently paradox intervention to reach gender equality in the long run by winning more female students will be analyzed.","PeriodicalId":146973,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intervention models towards more diversity in engineering education\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Freitag, A. Thaler\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent trends in the numbers of engineering students in education suggest that there is a need for change in engineering study programs. One attempt to gain more students is to address a more diverse students' population. This paper draws on current studies on good practice in engineering education in Europe. Based on empirical data, two major trends will be discussed: first, the role of interdisciplinary courses attracting not only more women but generally more ‘non-typical’ engineering students. Second, women only engineering degree courses as an apparently paradox intervention to reach gender equality in the long run by winning more female students will be analyzed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":146973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)\",\"volume\":\"114 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2011.5773185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

工程专业学生在教育中的数量最近的趋势表明,有必要改变工程学习计划。获得更多学生的一种尝试是解决更多样化的学生群体。本文借鉴了欧洲工程教育良好实践的研究现状。基于经验数据,本文将讨论两个主要趋势:首先,跨学科课程不仅吸引更多的女性,而且通常吸引更多的“非典型”工程专业学生。其次,将分析女性工程学位课程作为一种明显矛盾的干预措施,通过赢得更多的女学生来实现长期的性别平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intervention models towards more diversity in engineering education
Recent trends in the numbers of engineering students in education suggest that there is a need for change in engineering study programs. One attempt to gain more students is to address a more diverse students' population. This paper draws on current studies on good practice in engineering education in Europe. Based on empirical data, two major trends will be discussed: first, the role of interdisciplinary courses attracting not only more women but generally more ‘non-typical’ engineering students. Second, women only engineering degree courses as an apparently paradox intervention to reach gender equality in the long run by winning more female students will be analyzed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Learner mobility between engineering education and a twenty first century workplace Media literacy worldwide. Similarities and differences of theoretical and practical approaches Remote labs as learning services in the educational arena Perception of French students in engineering about the ethics of their profession and implications for engineering education Harnessing clouds for e-learning: New directions followed by UNED
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1