逆作用域和间接否定

Kwang-Sup Kim
{"title":"逆作用域和间接否定","authors":"Kwang-Sup Kim","doi":"10.15860/SIGG.26.4.201611.475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sentential negator not can have scope over the subject although the former fails to c-command the latter. When there is an asymmetry between syntactic structure and logical form, we can make use of either QR or Reconstruction. However, this paper shows that both approaches are not viable options, and then claims that the subject can be indirectly negated when not negates T, which denotes ‘true’. The main idea is that if T is negated, then the truth of its projection, TP, is negated since T denotes ‘true’ and so the constituents within TP can be negated.","PeriodicalId":204972,"journal":{"name":"Studies in generative grammar","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inverse Scope and Indirect Negation\",\"authors\":\"Kwang-Sup Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.15860/SIGG.26.4.201611.475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The sentential negator not can have scope over the subject although the former fails to c-command the latter. When there is an asymmetry between syntactic structure and logical form, we can make use of either QR or Reconstruction. However, this paper shows that both approaches are not viable options, and then claims that the subject can be indirectly negated when not negates T, which denotes ‘true’. The main idea is that if T is negated, then the truth of its projection, TP, is negated since T denotes ‘true’ and so the constituents within TP can be negated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":204972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in generative grammar\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in generative grammar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15860/SIGG.26.4.201611.475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in generative grammar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15860/SIGG.26.4.201611.475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

否定句不能对主语施加c-command,但否定句不能对主语施加c-command。当句法结构和逻辑形式不对称时,我们可以使用QR法或重构法。然而,本文表明这两种方法都不是可行的选择,然后声称当not否定T(表示“真”)时,主体可以被间接否定。主要思想是,如果T是负的,那么它的投影TP的真值是负的,因为T表示“真”,因此TP内的成分可以是负的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inverse Scope and Indirect Negation
The sentential negator not can have scope over the subject although the former fails to c-command the latter. When there is an asymmetry between syntactic structure and logical form, we can make use of either QR or Reconstruction. However, this paper shows that both approaches are not viable options, and then claims that the subject can be indirectly negated when not negates T, which denotes ‘true’. The main idea is that if T is negated, then the truth of its projection, TP, is negated since T denotes ‘true’ and so the constituents within TP can be negated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bound Noun twung in Korean Free Merge or Maximality: On Criterial Freezing Preposing in Nominals as Movement into a Theta-Position Subject-Object Asymmetry in Korean Floating Classifier Constructions The Sluicing-Comp Generalization and the Economy Principle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1