眼动追踪数据的伪影去除用于认知警觉性水平评估

Nadia Abu Farha, Fares Al-Shargie, U. Tariq, H. Al-Nashash
{"title":"眼动追踪数据的伪影去除用于认知警觉性水平评估","authors":"Nadia Abu Farha, Fares Al-Shargie, U. Tariq, H. Al-Nashash","doi":"10.1109/ICABME53305.2021.9604870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present a preprocessing pipeline of Eye tracking data to assess cognitive vigilance levels. We introduced two different levels of vigilance state; alertness and vigilance decrement while subjects were performing Stroop Color-Word Task (SCWT) for approximately 45 minutes. We assessed the levels of vigilance by utilizing Eye tracking data and five machine learning (ML) classifiers. Our preprocessing pipeline consists of baseline correction, and artifacts, and noise removal. We extracted six features namely: fixation duration, pupil size, saccade duration, saccade amplitude, saccade velocity, and blink duration. These features were then used as an input to the five ML classifiers for vigilance level classification. We achieved the highest classification accuracy of 76.8% in differentiating between the two vigilance levels using all features with a selected Support vector machine classifier. Other classifiers have also achieved comparable accuracy.","PeriodicalId":294393,"journal":{"name":"2021 Sixth International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME)","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artifact Removal of Eye Tracking Data for the Assessment of Cognitive Vigilance Levels\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Abu Farha, Fares Al-Shargie, U. Tariq, H. Al-Nashash\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICABME53305.2021.9604870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we present a preprocessing pipeline of Eye tracking data to assess cognitive vigilance levels. We introduced two different levels of vigilance state; alertness and vigilance decrement while subjects were performing Stroop Color-Word Task (SCWT) for approximately 45 minutes. We assessed the levels of vigilance by utilizing Eye tracking data and five machine learning (ML) classifiers. Our preprocessing pipeline consists of baseline correction, and artifacts, and noise removal. We extracted six features namely: fixation duration, pupil size, saccade duration, saccade amplitude, saccade velocity, and blink duration. These features were then used as an input to the five ML classifiers for vigilance level classification. We achieved the highest classification accuracy of 76.8% in differentiating between the two vigilance levels using all features with a selected Support vector machine classifier. Other classifiers have also achieved comparable accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 Sixth International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME)\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 Sixth International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICABME53305.2021.9604870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Sixth International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICABME53305.2021.9604870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在本文中,我们提出了一个眼动追踪数据的预处理管道来评估认知警觉性水平。我们引入了两种不同级别的警戒状态;当受试者执行Stroop色字任务(SCWT)约45分钟时,警觉性和警觉性下降。我们利用眼动追踪数据和五种机器学习(ML)分类器来评估警惕性水平。我们的预处理管道包括基线校正、伪影和噪声去除。我们提取了6个特征:注视时间、瞳孔大小、扫视时间、扫视幅度、扫视速度和眨眼时间。然后将这些特征用作五个ML分类器的输入,用于警戒级别分类。我们在使用选择的支持向量机分类器的所有特征区分两个警戒级别方面取得了76.8%的最高分类准确率。其他分类器也达到了相当的准确度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artifact Removal of Eye Tracking Data for the Assessment of Cognitive Vigilance Levels
In this paper, we present a preprocessing pipeline of Eye tracking data to assess cognitive vigilance levels. We introduced two different levels of vigilance state; alertness and vigilance decrement while subjects were performing Stroop Color-Word Task (SCWT) for approximately 45 minutes. We assessed the levels of vigilance by utilizing Eye tracking data and five machine learning (ML) classifiers. Our preprocessing pipeline consists of baseline correction, and artifacts, and noise removal. We extracted six features namely: fixation duration, pupil size, saccade duration, saccade amplitude, saccade velocity, and blink duration. These features were then used as an input to the five ML classifiers for vigilance level classification. We achieved the highest classification accuracy of 76.8% in differentiating between the two vigilance levels using all features with a selected Support vector machine classifier. Other classifiers have also achieved comparable accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usefulness of Functional MRI Textures in the Evaluation of Renal Function Personalized spatial recruitment model to motor unit type and number Distinguishing Hearts: How Machine Learning identifies People based on their Heartbeat Comparing Healthy Subjects and Alzheimer’s Disease Patients using Brain Network Similarity: a Preliminary Study Digital deparaffinization of Raman spectral image acquired on FFPE human skin tissue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1