国家援助规则和增值税下的平等

J. Englisch
{"title":"国家援助规则和增值税下的平等","authors":"J. Englisch","doi":"10.1080/20488432.2019.1684648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It is often overlooked that within the EU, tax concessions and advantageous tax procedures can constitute prohibited State aid not only in the field of direct taxation, but also within the framework of the harmonised system of EU VAT. The potential for conflict has indeed increased in recent years, because the European Court of Justice (CJEU) has successively expanded the concept of selective State aid laid down in Art. 107 (1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU). This article offers a critical analysis of how the CJEU has transformed the State aid prohibition into a broad non-discrimination standard, and it explores how this affects national legislation on preferential VAT regimes. In particular, the article highlights the increased relevance of correctly identifying the guiding principles of the VAT system, and how different perceptions of those idées directrices of the European VAT influence the outcome of the equal treatment analysis inherent to Art. 107 (1) TFEU. This is exemplified, in particular, with respect to VAT grouping regimes. Finally, the interaction with other equality standards is also discussed.","PeriodicalId":114680,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equality under State aid rules and VAT\",\"authors\":\"J. Englisch\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20488432.2019.1684648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT It is often overlooked that within the EU, tax concessions and advantageous tax procedures can constitute prohibited State aid not only in the field of direct taxation, but also within the framework of the harmonised system of EU VAT. The potential for conflict has indeed increased in recent years, because the European Court of Justice (CJEU) has successively expanded the concept of selective State aid laid down in Art. 107 (1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU). This article offers a critical analysis of how the CJEU has transformed the State aid prohibition into a broad non-discrimination standard, and it explores how this affects national legislation on preferential VAT regimes. In particular, the article highlights the increased relevance of correctly identifying the guiding principles of the VAT system, and how different perceptions of those idées directrices of the European VAT influence the outcome of the equal treatment analysis inherent to Art. 107 (1) TFEU. This is exemplified, in particular, with respect to VAT grouping regimes. Finally, the interaction with other equality standards is also discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20488432.2019.1684648\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20488432.2019.1684648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人们经常忽视的是,在欧盟内部,税收优惠和有利的税收程序不仅在直接税领域,而且在欧盟增值税协调体系的框架内,都可能构成被禁止的国家援助。近年来发生冲突的可能性确实有所增加,因为欧洲法院(欧洲法院)先后扩大了《欧盟运作条约》第107(1)条规定的选择性国家援助概念。本文对欧洲法院如何将国家援助禁令转变为广泛的非歧视标准进行了批判性分析,并探讨了这如何影响有关优惠增值税制度的国家立法。特别是,本文强调了正确确定增值税制度的指导原则的重要性,以及对欧洲增值税的这些指导原则的不同看法如何影响第107(1)条TFEU固有的平等待遇分析的结果。这是一个例子,特别是在增值税分组制度方面。最后,还讨论了与其他平等标准的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Equality under State aid rules and VAT
ABSTRACT It is often overlooked that within the EU, tax concessions and advantageous tax procedures can constitute prohibited State aid not only in the field of direct taxation, but also within the framework of the harmonised system of EU VAT. The potential for conflict has indeed increased in recent years, because the European Court of Justice (CJEU) has successively expanded the concept of selective State aid laid down in Art. 107 (1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU). This article offers a critical analysis of how the CJEU has transformed the State aid prohibition into a broad non-discrimination standard, and it explores how this affects national legislation on preferential VAT regimes. In particular, the article highlights the increased relevance of correctly identifying the guiding principles of the VAT system, and how different perceptions of those idées directrices of the European VAT influence the outcome of the equal treatment analysis inherent to Art. 107 (1) TFEU. This is exemplified, in particular, with respect to VAT grouping regimes. Finally, the interaction with other equality standards is also discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Equality under State aid rules and VAT The direct and immediate link with specialised services contracts as a measure for the right to deduct input VAT and the uncertainty in European tax law VAT deduction and member state sovereignty: (still) a good idea? EU VAT at the dawn of the Fourth Industrial Revolution* VAT information asymmetries in the context of intra-EU trade in goods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1