EMPATIA:参与式预算的多渠道平台

B. Sousa, Vitor Fonseca, Luís Cordeiro, Bianca Flamigni, L. Foschini, P. Simões, U. Sivarajah, V. Weerakkody
{"title":"EMPATIA:参与式预算的多渠道平台","authors":"B. Sousa, Vitor Fonseca, Luís Cordeiro, Bianca Flamigni, L. Foschini, P. Simões, U. Sivarajah, V. Weerakkody","doi":"10.4018/ijegr.2019040104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Participatory budgeting (PB) is currently one of the most widely adopted democratic innovations. ICT platforms are key enablers of PB processes, by supporting citizen engagement. They support the establishment of diverse participation channels to build candidate proposals, for the voting process, and for monitoring proposals' implementation. PB platforms differ from electronic voting systems, reflecting the intrinsic nature of PB processes. While vote secrecy and trustworthiness of voting results is still a major requirement, other factors weight in, such as the focus on the whole process and the need for engaging several citizens by providing multiple participation channels. PB processes take place at multiple scales (municipal, national) requiring flexible deployment and dimensioning approaches. EMPATIA is an ICT platform for PB, based on multiple dimensioning and deployment options that reflect the scenarios where PB tools are expected to operate. The evaluation results provide relevant inputs to the design and implementation of similar participatory and/or voting platforms.","PeriodicalId":170341,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res.","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EMPATIA: A Multichannel Platform for Participatory Budgeting\",\"authors\":\"B. Sousa, Vitor Fonseca, Luís Cordeiro, Bianca Flamigni, L. Foschini, P. Simões, U. Sivarajah, V. Weerakkody\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/ijegr.2019040104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Participatory budgeting (PB) is currently one of the most widely adopted democratic innovations. ICT platforms are key enablers of PB processes, by supporting citizen engagement. They support the establishment of diverse participation channels to build candidate proposals, for the voting process, and for monitoring proposals' implementation. PB platforms differ from electronic voting systems, reflecting the intrinsic nature of PB processes. While vote secrecy and trustworthiness of voting results is still a major requirement, other factors weight in, such as the focus on the whole process and the need for engaging several citizens by providing multiple participation channels. PB processes take place at multiple scales (municipal, national) requiring flexible deployment and dimensioning approaches. EMPATIA is an ICT platform for PB, based on multiple dimensioning and deployment options that reflect the scenarios where PB tools are expected to operate. The evaluation results provide relevant inputs to the design and implementation of similar participatory and/or voting platforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res.\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijegr.2019040104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/ijegr.2019040104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

参与式预算是目前被广泛采用的民主创新方式之一。信息通信技术平台通过支持公民参与,是PB进程的关键推动者。支持建立多元化的参与渠道,建立候选提案、参与投票、监督提案实施。PB平台不同于电子投票系统,反映了PB过程的内在本质。虽然投票保密和投票结果的可信度仍然是一个主要要求,但其他因素也很重要,比如关注整个过程,以及通过提供多种参与渠道让多个公民参与进来的必要性。PB过程发生在多个尺度上(市政、国家),需要灵活的部署和量体化方法。EMPATIA是PB的ICT平台,基于多维度和部署选项,反映了PB工具预期运行的场景。评估结果为设计和实施类似的参与和/或投票平台提供了相关的投入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EMPATIA: A Multichannel Platform for Participatory Budgeting
Participatory budgeting (PB) is currently one of the most widely adopted democratic innovations. ICT platforms are key enablers of PB processes, by supporting citizen engagement. They support the establishment of diverse participation channels to build candidate proposals, for the voting process, and for monitoring proposals' implementation. PB platforms differ from electronic voting systems, reflecting the intrinsic nature of PB processes. While vote secrecy and trustworthiness of voting results is still a major requirement, other factors weight in, such as the focus on the whole process and the need for engaging several citizens by providing multiple participation channels. PB processes take place at multiple scales (municipal, national) requiring flexible deployment and dimensioning approaches. EMPATIA is an ICT platform for PB, based on multiple dimensioning and deployment options that reflect the scenarios where PB tools are expected to operate. The evaluation results provide relevant inputs to the design and implementation of similar participatory and/or voting platforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Business Process Modeling Supporting the Requirements Elicitation of an Audit System: An Experience Report A Framework for Public eServices Transparency Designing an E-Voting Framework Using Blockchain Technology: A Case Study of Oman Influences of Digital Transformation on Life Expectancy and the Gender Gap in European Countries Fate of AI for Smart City Services in India: A Qualitative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1