{"title":"通过设立条款保护宗教自由:联合计划信托诉讼案例","authors":"Eric G. Andersen","doi":"10.5072/ULR.V2008I3.821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is best known for its open practice of polygamy, long abandoned by the church from which it broke away generations ago. Less notorious is its communitarian economic program involving the centralized ownership and management of the real estate assets of the church and its members. Their houses, farms, and businesses, located in a remote community straddling the Utah-Arizona border, are owned by the United Effort Plan Trust, a public charitable trust. The terms of the trust have obligated the trustees to administer its assets in accordance with religious principles. The Trustees have historically been leaders of the church. In 2005 the Utah Attorney General alleged that the trustees were committing serious breaches of their fiduciary duty, putting its assets at risk. In response to the Attorney General's petition, a state trial court placed control of the trust in the hands of a \"special fiduciary.\" The court then reformed the trust extensively, converting it into an essentially secular instrument. For example, trustees selected and controlled by the church president are to be replaced with a board approved by the court. They are to accept only non-binding advice from ecclesiastical leaders. The \"needs and just wants\" of beneficiaries are no longer to be gauged by religious purpose and the mandates of scripture, but by the new trustees' assessment of their need for adequate housing and education. The changes wrought by the court impose deeply upon the religious character of the trust. The reformation of the trust raises challenging issues under the religion clauses of the First Amendment. The reformation may pass muster under the Free Exercise Clause, but the court did trespass the bounds of the Establishment Clause, which constrains the state from intruding into the functioning of a religious community.","PeriodicalId":431712,"journal":{"name":"University of Iowa College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protecting Religious Liberty Through the Establishment Clause: The Case of the United Effort Plan Trust Litigation\",\"authors\":\"Eric G. Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.5072/ULR.V2008I3.821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is best known for its open practice of polygamy, long abandoned by the church from which it broke away generations ago. Less notorious is its communitarian economic program involving the centralized ownership and management of the real estate assets of the church and its members. Their houses, farms, and businesses, located in a remote community straddling the Utah-Arizona border, are owned by the United Effort Plan Trust, a public charitable trust. The terms of the trust have obligated the trustees to administer its assets in accordance with religious principles. The Trustees have historically been leaders of the church. In 2005 the Utah Attorney General alleged that the trustees were committing serious breaches of their fiduciary duty, putting its assets at risk. In response to the Attorney General's petition, a state trial court placed control of the trust in the hands of a \\\"special fiduciary.\\\" The court then reformed the trust extensively, converting it into an essentially secular instrument. For example, trustees selected and controlled by the church president are to be replaced with a board approved by the court. They are to accept only non-binding advice from ecclesiastical leaders. The \\\"needs and just wants\\\" of beneficiaries are no longer to be gauged by religious purpose and the mandates of scripture, but by the new trustees' assessment of their need for adequate housing and education. The changes wrought by the court impose deeply upon the religious character of the trust. The reformation of the trust raises challenging issues under the religion clauses of the First Amendment. The reformation may pass muster under the Free Exercise Clause, but the court did trespass the bounds of the Establishment Clause, which constrains the state from intruding into the functioning of a religious community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Iowa College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Iowa College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5072/ULR.V2008I3.821\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Iowa College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5072/ULR.V2008I3.821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
原教旨主义的耶稣基督后期圣徒教会以其公开实行一夫多妻制而闻名,这一做法早在几代人之前就被教会抛弃了。不那么臭名昭著的是它的社区经济计划,包括教会及其成员的房地产资产的集中所有权和管理。他们的房屋、农场和企业位于横跨犹他州和亚利桑那州边境的一个偏远社区,由公共慈善信托机构联合努力计划信托基金(United Effort Plan Trust)所有。信托条款规定受托人有义务按照宗教原则管理其资产。受托人历来都是教会的领袖。2005年,犹他州总检察长声称受托人严重违反了他们的受托责任,使其资产处于危险之中。作为对司法部长请愿书的回应,一个州初审法院将信托的控制权交给了一位“特殊受托人”。法院随后对信托进行了广泛改革,将其转变为本质上的世俗工具。例如,由教会主席选择和控制的受托人将由法院批准的董事会取代。他们只能接受来自教会领袖的不具约束力的建议。受益人的“需要和仅仅需要”不再由宗教目的和圣经的命令来衡量,而是由新的受托人对他们对适当住房和教育需求的评估来衡量。法院造成的变化深深影响了信托的宗教性质。信托的改革在宪法第一修正案的宗教条款下提出了具有挑战性的问题。这项改革可能会通过《宗教自由条款》的审查,但法院确实侵犯了《政教分离条款》的界限,这一条款限制了国家干涉宗教团体的运作。
Protecting Religious Liberty Through the Establishment Clause: The Case of the United Effort Plan Trust Litigation
The Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is best known for its open practice of polygamy, long abandoned by the church from which it broke away generations ago. Less notorious is its communitarian economic program involving the centralized ownership and management of the real estate assets of the church and its members. Their houses, farms, and businesses, located in a remote community straddling the Utah-Arizona border, are owned by the United Effort Plan Trust, a public charitable trust. The terms of the trust have obligated the trustees to administer its assets in accordance with religious principles. The Trustees have historically been leaders of the church. In 2005 the Utah Attorney General alleged that the trustees were committing serious breaches of their fiduciary duty, putting its assets at risk. In response to the Attorney General's petition, a state trial court placed control of the trust in the hands of a "special fiduciary." The court then reformed the trust extensively, converting it into an essentially secular instrument. For example, trustees selected and controlled by the church president are to be replaced with a board approved by the court. They are to accept only non-binding advice from ecclesiastical leaders. The "needs and just wants" of beneficiaries are no longer to be gauged by religious purpose and the mandates of scripture, but by the new trustees' assessment of their need for adequate housing and education. The changes wrought by the court impose deeply upon the religious character of the trust. The reformation of the trust raises challenging issues under the religion clauses of the First Amendment. The reformation may pass muster under the Free Exercise Clause, but the court did trespass the bounds of the Establishment Clause, which constrains the state from intruding into the functioning of a religious community.