加拿大在医疗保健中使用人工智能的责任问题:人工智能和医疗决策

Mélanie Bourassa Forcier, L. Khoury, Nathalie Vézina
{"title":"加拿大在医疗保健中使用人工智能的责任问题:人工智能和医疗决策","authors":"Mélanie Bourassa Forcier, L. Khoury, Nathalie Vézina","doi":"10.15273/dmj.vol46no2.10140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores Canadian liability concerns flowing from the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool assisting physicians in their medical decision-making. It argues that the current Canadian legal framework is sufficient, in most cases, to allow developers and users of AI technology to assess each stakeholder's responsibility should the technology cause harm.","PeriodicalId":293977,"journal":{"name":"Dalhousie Medical Journal","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liability issues for the use of artificial intelligence in health care in Canada: AI and medical decision-making\",\"authors\":\"Mélanie Bourassa Forcier, L. Khoury, Nathalie Vézina\",\"doi\":\"10.15273/dmj.vol46no2.10140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores Canadian liability concerns flowing from the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool assisting physicians in their medical decision-making. It argues that the current Canadian legal framework is sufficient, in most cases, to allow developers and users of AI technology to assess each stakeholder's responsibility should the technology cause harm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":293977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dalhousie Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dalhousie Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.vol46no2.10140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dalhousie Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.vol46no2.10140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了人工智能(AI)作为辅助医生进行医疗决策的工具的整合所带来的加拿大责任问题。它认为,在大多数情况下,目前的加拿大法律框架足以允许人工智能技术的开发人员和用户在技术造成损害时评估每个利益相关者的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Liability issues for the use of artificial intelligence in health care in Canada: AI and medical decision-making
This paper explores Canadian liability concerns flowing from the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) as a tool assisting physicians in their medical decision-making. It argues that the current Canadian legal framework is sufficient, in most cases, to allow developers and users of AI technology to assess each stakeholder's responsibility should the technology cause harm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hackathons within medical education: Promoting cutting-edge innovation in surgery The association between gestational age at delivery and neonatal abstinence syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis Two for the price of one: The benefits of job sharing to increase women representation in surgical specialties Cutting edge hackathon competition winners strive to better support more surgeons with primary childcare responsibilities A discussion of contemporary platforms for women in surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1