{"title":"用于手写识别验证后处理的置信度建模","authors":"J. Pitrelli, M. Perrone","doi":"10.1109/IWFHR.2002.1030880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We apply confidence-scoring techniques to verify the output of a handwriting recognizer. We evaluate a variety of scoring functions, including likelihood ratios and estimated posterior probabilities of correctness, in a postprocessing mode to generate confidence scores at the character or word level. Using the post-processor in conjunction with an HMM-based on-line handwriting recognizer for large-vocabulary word recognition, receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves reveal that our post-processor is able to reject correctly 90% of recognizer errors while only falsely rejecting 33% of correctly-recognized words. For isolated-digit recognition, we achieve a correct rejection rate of 90% while keeping false rejection down to 13%.","PeriodicalId":114017,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Eighth International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confidence modeling for verification post-processing for handwriting recognition\",\"authors\":\"J. Pitrelli, M. Perrone\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IWFHR.2002.1030880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We apply confidence-scoring techniques to verify the output of a handwriting recognizer. We evaluate a variety of scoring functions, including likelihood ratios and estimated posterior probabilities of correctness, in a postprocessing mode to generate confidence scores at the character or word level. Using the post-processor in conjunction with an HMM-based on-line handwriting recognizer for large-vocabulary word recognition, receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves reveal that our post-processor is able to reject correctly 90% of recognizer errors while only falsely rejecting 33% of correctly-recognized words. For isolated-digit recognition, we achieve a correct rejection rate of 90% while keeping false rejection down to 13%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Eighth International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Eighth International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWFHR.2002.1030880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Eighth International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWFHR.2002.1030880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Confidence modeling for verification post-processing for handwriting recognition
We apply confidence-scoring techniques to verify the output of a handwriting recognizer. We evaluate a variety of scoring functions, including likelihood ratios and estimated posterior probabilities of correctness, in a postprocessing mode to generate confidence scores at the character or word level. Using the post-processor in conjunction with an HMM-based on-line handwriting recognizer for large-vocabulary word recognition, receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves reveal that our post-processor is able to reject correctly 90% of recognizer errors while only falsely rejecting 33% of correctly-recognized words. For isolated-digit recognition, we achieve a correct rejection rate of 90% while keeping false rejection down to 13%.