欧洲能源系统中不同灵活性选择的技术经济特征比较

J. Michaelis, T. Müller, U. Reiter, F. Fermi, A. Wyrwa, Yi-kuang Chen, Christoph Zöphel, Nicolas Kronthaler, Rainer Elsland
{"title":"欧洲能源系统中不同灵活性选择的技术经济特征比较","authors":"J. Michaelis, T. Müller, U. Reiter, F. Fermi, A. Wyrwa, Yi-kuang Chen, Christoph Zöphel, Nicolas Kronthaler, Rainer Elsland","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2017.7981983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The electricity supply will become more volatile in energy systems with increasing shares of Renewable Energy Sources (RES). Since electricity demand varies as does the supply by RES, the remaining residual load must be covered by flexible technologies that are required to balance the different types of fluctuations. In this study, these flexibility options are divided into three categories: increasing the residual load, decreasing the residual load and shifting the electricity demand / supply temporally or spatially. Furthermore, typical technological options are discussed for each category, and four flexibility criteria are used to compare their technical and economic characteristics. These include the activation time, duration of flexibility provision, number of activations and activation costs. The study reveals that various options exist and no one technology dominates. However, within the flexibility categories, it can be shown that some appliances have advantages in three of the four categories compared to the other options. Ultimately, the choice of the most appropriate flexibility option depends on the requirements of the energy system. It can be concluded that a mix of technologies will be needed to cover the future flexible demand that may include short-term changes of the residual load as well as long-term downturns of RES generation.","PeriodicalId":416082,"journal":{"name":"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the techno-economic characteristics of different flexibility options in the European energy system\",\"authors\":\"J. Michaelis, T. Müller, U. Reiter, F. Fermi, A. Wyrwa, Yi-kuang Chen, Christoph Zöphel, Nicolas Kronthaler, Rainer Elsland\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEM.2017.7981983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The electricity supply will become more volatile in energy systems with increasing shares of Renewable Energy Sources (RES). Since electricity demand varies as does the supply by RES, the remaining residual load must be covered by flexible technologies that are required to balance the different types of fluctuations. In this study, these flexibility options are divided into three categories: increasing the residual load, decreasing the residual load and shifting the electricity demand / supply temporally or spatially. Furthermore, typical technological options are discussed for each category, and four flexibility criteria are used to compare their technical and economic characteristics. These include the activation time, duration of flexibility provision, number of activations and activation costs. The study reveals that various options exist and no one technology dominates. However, within the flexibility categories, it can be shown that some appliances have advantages in three of the four categories compared to the other options. Ultimately, the choice of the most appropriate flexibility option depends on the requirements of the energy system. It can be concluded that a mix of technologies will be needed to cover the future flexible demand that may include short-term changes of the residual load as well as long-term downturns of RES generation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2017.7981983\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 14th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2017.7981983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

随着可再生能源(RES)份额的增加,电力供应将在能源系统中变得更加不稳定。由于电力需求和可再生能源的供应都在变化,因此必须采用灵活的技术来平衡不同类型的波动。在本研究中,这些灵活性选择分为三类:增加剩余负荷、减少剩余负荷和在时间或空间上转移电力需求/供应。在此基础上,对每一类的典型技术方案进行了讨论,并采用四个灵活性标准对其技术和经济特性进行了比较。这些因素包括激活时间、灵活性提供的持续时间、激活数量和激活成本。研究表明,存在多种选择,没有一种技术占主导地位。然而,在灵活性类别中,可以显示出与其他选项相比,某些设备在四个类别中的三个类别中具有优势。最终,选择最合适的灵活性选项取决于能源系统的要求。可以得出结论,将需要混合技术来满足未来的灵活需求,这些需求可能包括剩余负荷的短期变化以及可再生能源发电的长期低迷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the techno-economic characteristics of different flexibility options in the European energy system
The electricity supply will become more volatile in energy systems with increasing shares of Renewable Energy Sources (RES). Since electricity demand varies as does the supply by RES, the remaining residual load must be covered by flexible technologies that are required to balance the different types of fluctuations. In this study, these flexibility options are divided into three categories: increasing the residual load, decreasing the residual load and shifting the electricity demand / supply temporally or spatially. Furthermore, typical technological options are discussed for each category, and four flexibility criteria are used to compare their technical and economic characteristics. These include the activation time, duration of flexibility provision, number of activations and activation costs. The study reveals that various options exist and no one technology dominates. However, within the flexibility categories, it can be shown that some appliances have advantages in three of the four categories compared to the other options. Ultimately, the choice of the most appropriate flexibility option depends on the requirements of the energy system. It can be concluded that a mix of technologies will be needed to cover the future flexible demand that may include short-term changes of the residual load as well as long-term downturns of RES generation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Market integration VS temporal granularity: How to provide needed flexibility resources? FV-battery community energy systems: Economic, energy independence and network deferral analysis Adequacy of power capacity during winter peaks in Finland An analysis of market mechanism and bidding strategy for power balancing market mixed by conventional and renewable energy Network pricing for smart grids considering customers' diversified contribution to system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1