{"title":"编辑概述","authors":"T. Liao","doi":"10.1177/00472395211001205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the March 2015 issue of JETS, we reviewed the book “Blended: Using Disruptive Innovation to Improve Schools.” We are now facing a different type of disruption (Covid-19 crisis) that is challenging us to invent new learning systems. We need to design our new educational programs to blend in-school instruction with online learning experiences. The book “Blended” can be used as a practical guide for implementing blended learning techniques in K-12 schools. The new blended systems should combine the best of both worlds: in-class instruction with online learning activities. The lead article in this issue of JETS provides an excellent example of how a blended learning program was implemented in an elementary school in India. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of blended learning on students’ achievement, to monitor teachers’ perceptions, and finally to determine its potential in underprivileged classrooms. Important findings were that blended learning had a positive impact on student achievement and also students had positive attitudes toward blended learning. The second paper explores the question: do school levels impact the use of educational technology? One of the keys to the successful implementation of blended learning is the positive perceptions and use of educational technologies at different grade levels. An interesting finding of the Technology Use Perceptions Survey was that elementary school teachers made more frequent use of instructional technology than highschool teachers. To optimize blended learning environments, an important consideration is the type of classroom instruction that is being blended with online systems. In the next paper, a comparison is made between the traditional classroom and a smart classroom. An important difference between the two types of classroom environments is the role of teachers and students. For example, there is a significant difference between how cooperative learning strategies are implemented. The next two papers focus on some of the problems of the use of two modern digital communication systems: smartphones and Instagram systems. The fourth paper deals with a research project that seeks to understand students’ unstructured cell phone usage, faculty responses, and concrete interventions to off-task usage. The next paper investigates the adolescent’s perceptions toward Instagram via their mind maps to understand this social media phenomenon. The goal of both projects is to explore ways of minimizing the disruptions caused by these two popular social media systems. Editorial","PeriodicalId":300288,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Technology Systems","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial Overview\",\"authors\":\"T. Liao\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00472395211001205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the March 2015 issue of JETS, we reviewed the book “Blended: Using Disruptive Innovation to Improve Schools.” We are now facing a different type of disruption (Covid-19 crisis) that is challenging us to invent new learning systems. We need to design our new educational programs to blend in-school instruction with online learning experiences. The book “Blended” can be used as a practical guide for implementing blended learning techniques in K-12 schools. The new blended systems should combine the best of both worlds: in-class instruction with online learning activities. The lead article in this issue of JETS provides an excellent example of how a blended learning program was implemented in an elementary school in India. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of blended learning on students’ achievement, to monitor teachers’ perceptions, and finally to determine its potential in underprivileged classrooms. Important findings were that blended learning had a positive impact on student achievement and also students had positive attitudes toward blended learning. The second paper explores the question: do school levels impact the use of educational technology? One of the keys to the successful implementation of blended learning is the positive perceptions and use of educational technologies at different grade levels. An interesting finding of the Technology Use Perceptions Survey was that elementary school teachers made more frequent use of instructional technology than highschool teachers. To optimize blended learning environments, an important consideration is the type of classroom instruction that is being blended with online systems. In the next paper, a comparison is made between the traditional classroom and a smart classroom. An important difference between the two types of classroom environments is the role of teachers and students. For example, there is a significant difference between how cooperative learning strategies are implemented. The next two papers focus on some of the problems of the use of two modern digital communication systems: smartphones and Instagram systems. The fourth paper deals with a research project that seeks to understand students’ unstructured cell phone usage, faculty responses, and concrete interventions to off-task usage. The next paper investigates the adolescent’s perceptions toward Instagram via their mind maps to understand this social media phenomenon. The goal of both projects is to explore ways of minimizing the disruptions caused by these two popular social media systems. Editorial\",\"PeriodicalId\":300288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Technology Systems\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Technology Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211001205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Technology Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211001205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2015年3月的《喷气机》杂志上,我们回顾了《混合:利用破坏性创新改善学校》一书。我们现在面临着一种不同类型的破坏(Covid-19危机),它要求我们发明新的学习系统。我们需要设计新的教育项目,将校内教学与在线学习结合起来。这本书“混合”可以作为在K-12学校实施混合学习技术的实用指南。新的混合系统应该结合两个世界的优点:课堂教学与在线学习活动。本期《喷气机》杂志的主要文章提供了一个很好的例子,说明了印度一所小学是如何实施混合学习计划的。本研究的目的是调查混合式学习对学生成绩的影响,监测教师的看法,并最终确定其在贫困教室中的潜力。重要的发现是混合学习对学生的成绩有积极的影响,学生对混合学习有积极的态度。第二篇论文探讨的问题是:学校水平会影响教育技术的使用吗?成功实施混合式学习的关键之一是在不同年级对教育技术的积极认知和使用。技术使用感知调查的一个有趣发现是,小学教师比高中教师更频繁地使用教学技术。为了优化混合式学习环境,一个重要的考虑因素是与在线系统混合的课堂教学类型。在接下来的文章中,我们将对传统课堂和智能课堂进行比较。两种类型的课堂环境之间的一个重要区别是教师和学生的角色。例如,在如何实施合作学习策略之间存在显著差异。接下来的两篇论文集中在使用两种现代数字通信系统的一些问题:智能手机和Instagram系统。第四篇论文涉及一个研究项目,旨在了解学生的非结构化手机使用情况,教师的反应,以及对非任务使用的具体干预措施。下一篇论文通过他们的思维导图来调查青少年对Instagram的看法,以了解这种社交媒体现象。这两个项目的目标都是探索将这两个流行的社交媒体系统造成的干扰最小化的方法。编辑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial Overview
In the March 2015 issue of JETS, we reviewed the book “Blended: Using Disruptive Innovation to Improve Schools.” We are now facing a different type of disruption (Covid-19 crisis) that is challenging us to invent new learning systems. We need to design our new educational programs to blend in-school instruction with online learning experiences. The book “Blended” can be used as a practical guide for implementing blended learning techniques in K-12 schools. The new blended systems should combine the best of both worlds: in-class instruction with online learning activities. The lead article in this issue of JETS provides an excellent example of how a blended learning program was implemented in an elementary school in India. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of blended learning on students’ achievement, to monitor teachers’ perceptions, and finally to determine its potential in underprivileged classrooms. Important findings were that blended learning had a positive impact on student achievement and also students had positive attitudes toward blended learning. The second paper explores the question: do school levels impact the use of educational technology? One of the keys to the successful implementation of blended learning is the positive perceptions and use of educational technologies at different grade levels. An interesting finding of the Technology Use Perceptions Survey was that elementary school teachers made more frequent use of instructional technology than highschool teachers. To optimize blended learning environments, an important consideration is the type of classroom instruction that is being blended with online systems. In the next paper, a comparison is made between the traditional classroom and a smart classroom. An important difference between the two types of classroom environments is the role of teachers and students. For example, there is a significant difference between how cooperative learning strategies are implemented. The next two papers focus on some of the problems of the use of two modern digital communication systems: smartphones and Instagram systems. The fourth paper deals with a research project that seeks to understand students’ unstructured cell phone usage, faculty responses, and concrete interventions to off-task usage. The next paper investigates the adolescent’s perceptions toward Instagram via their mind maps to understand this social media phenomenon. The goal of both projects is to explore ways of minimizing the disruptions caused by these two popular social media systems. Editorial
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
UX Design for Deaf Children: How is it Done Now? Should it Change? Innovative Debriefing Approach: Applying a Project Management Framework to Develop a Debriefing Communications Plan for Educational Computer-Based Simulation Games Creating a “Space In-Between”: Learning on the Physical–Hybrid–Virtual Continuum Early Perceptions of Teaching and Learning Using Generative AI in Higher Education Centering the Learner Within Instructional Design: The Evolution of Learning Design and the Emergence of Learning Experience Design (LXD) in Workforce Training and Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1