分布式虚拟内存系统中的页面替换

M. Malkawi, D. Knox, M. Abaza
{"title":"分布式虚拟内存系统中的页面替换","authors":"M. Malkawi, D. Knox, M. Abaza","doi":"10.1109/SPDP.1992.242719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors introduce three page replacement, and page out policies, in distributed virtual memory systems. Two of the replacement policies, the least recently brought and the global recently used or brought, are adapted versions of the least recently used policy, which is well known in conventional virtual memory systems. Trace driven simulation was used to evaluate the performance of the replacement policies and the RR (round robin), LAN (least active neighbor), and LLN (least loaded neighbor) page out policies. The results suggest that when the cost of internode faults is considerably higher than local memory access, global and remote policies are superior to the local one. When the cost of bringing a page from the immediate neighbor is considerably low compared to the cost of accessing the local memory, the local policy performs as well as the global and the remote. Among the page out policies, round robin is the least efficient. LLN generates lower cost than LAN when the size of the local memory is relatively large. Under high memory contention, LAN shows better performance.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":265469,"journal":{"name":"[1992] Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Page replacement in distributed virtual memory systems\",\"authors\":\"M. Malkawi, D. Knox, M. Abaza\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPDP.1992.242719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors introduce three page replacement, and page out policies, in distributed virtual memory systems. Two of the replacement policies, the least recently brought and the global recently used or brought, are adapted versions of the least recently used policy, which is well known in conventional virtual memory systems. Trace driven simulation was used to evaluate the performance of the replacement policies and the RR (round robin), LAN (least active neighbor), and LLN (least loaded neighbor) page out policies. The results suggest that when the cost of internode faults is considerably higher than local memory access, global and remote policies are superior to the local one. When the cost of bringing a page from the immediate neighbor is considerably low compared to the cost of accessing the local memory, the local policy performs as well as the global and the remote. Among the page out policies, round robin is the least efficient. LLN generates lower cost than LAN when the size of the local memory is relatively large. Under high memory contention, LAN shows better performance.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":265469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1992] Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1992] Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPDP.1992.242719\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1992] Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPDP.1992.242719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

作者介绍了分布式虚拟内存系统中的三页替换和出页策略。替换策略中的两个,即最近最少使用的策略和全局最近使用的策略,是最近最少使用的策略的改编版本,这在传统的虚拟内存系统中是众所周知的。跟踪驱动仿真用于评估替换策略和RR(轮询)、LAN(最少活跃邻居)和LLN(最少加载邻居)出页策略的性能。结果表明,当节点间故障的成本明显高于本地内存访问成本时,全局和远程策略优于本地策略。与访问本地内存的成本相比,从直接邻居获取页面的成本要低得多,那么本地策略的执行效果与全局策略和远程策略一样好。在出页策略中,轮循是效率最低的。当本地内存相对较大时,LLN比LAN产生更低的开销。在内存竞争激烈的情况下,局域网表现出更好的性能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Page replacement in distributed virtual memory systems
The authors introduce three page replacement, and page out policies, in distributed virtual memory systems. Two of the replacement policies, the least recently brought and the global recently used or brought, are adapted versions of the least recently used policy, which is well known in conventional virtual memory systems. Trace driven simulation was used to evaluate the performance of the replacement policies and the RR (round robin), LAN (least active neighbor), and LLN (least loaded neighbor) page out policies. The results suggest that when the cost of internode faults is considerably higher than local memory access, global and remote policies are superior to the local one. When the cost of bringing a page from the immediate neighbor is considerably low compared to the cost of accessing the local memory, the local policy performs as well as the global and the remote. Among the page out policies, round robin is the least efficient. LLN generates lower cost than LAN when the size of the local memory is relatively large. Under high memory contention, LAN shows better performance.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On uniformization of affine dependence algorithms On embedding ternary trees into Boolean hypercubes A divide and conquer approach to shortest paths in planar layered digraphs Advanced software pipelining and the program dependence graph A fast sort using parallelism within memory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1